Posts Tagged ‘9/11’

lead_large

I have a response to Drake’s characterisation of the Bush regime’s malfeasance:

Thomas Drake only sees a thin slice of the picture, and he makes excuses for the Bush regime’s deliberate actions, their desired “New Pearl Harbor.” They were not just concerned about Iraq, as he contends, but were pointedly avoiding any action on the Al Qaeda threat, which they were repeatedly informed about. That type of suspicious behavior should raise red flags, as they sought “plausible deniabilty” by floating these other alleged “priorities” in order to fool their own underlings (like Drake). Another far too credulous voice has been Richard Clarke, who specifically blew the whistle on having Al Qaeda intelligence hidden from his office (by George Tenet, CIA Director) when he was the president’s counter-terrorism advisor!!!

Neither Clarke nor Drake will suggest the obvious conclusion: HIGH TREASON. The Bush neocons wanted the attack to succeed. The attack gave them everything and more that they desired. The attack was long planned, long under surveillance and aided and abetted by their good friends the Saudis. Every effort that American law enforcers tried to take was deliberately thwarted and shut down. This is what treason looks like.

These guys are gullible to the point that they deceive themselves. The Bush neocon junta (unelected), signed the “new Pearl Harbor” document. They are on record. They needed the attack. They wanted the attack. Cheney was more than capable of monkey-wrenching the underlings into line (underlings like Drake).

NY Times:

“By May 1, (2001) the Central Intelligence Agency told the White House of a report that “a group presently in the United States” was planning a terrorist operation.”

A GROUP PRESENTLY IN THE UNITED STATES
  • MAY 1
  • 2001

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html?_r=1&

Wake up, Tom.

(more…)

52

Zacarias Moussaoui

Co-conspirator of 9/11 attacks says Saudi prince financed operation
“…he wants to take the stand and explain supposed links between the terrorist plot and Prince Turki bin Faisal Al Saud.
…The prince financed Moussaoui’s own flight classes, he asserts,“and was doing so knowingly for Osama bin Laden.”

The wheels came off the cover-up of 9/11 back in 2002 with Senator Bob Graham going on national TV and saying that “foreign governments” aided the hijackers. Now we may have some progress in working our way back toward treasonous Americans who aided and abetted the 9/11 plot.

I agree with what Senator Shelby said the degree to which agencies were not communicating was certainly a surprise but also I was surprised at the evidence that there were foreign governments involved in facilitating the activities of at least some of the terrorists in the United States.”
-Senator Bob Graham, PBS Newshour Dec. 11, 2002

SavagePx_CallRatio

Was Alex Brown a CIA Front When It Was “Innocuously” Shorting 9/11?

WJZ Exclusive: Baltimore Banker Reveals His Double Life As A CIA Agent

torture

100210_9_11_lg7

First Segments

9ce9a95cba097f77d633b1042cf6edb6b774cb17

PART 3 IS UP:

AND IF YOU MISSED PART ONE:

Continue at Part Four.

9781608463657_p0_v3_s260x420

PFB readers will undoubtedly gravitate toward Tom Englehardt’s new book, Shadow Government: Surveillance, Secret Wars, and a Global Security State in a Single-Superpower World.

Tomgram: Engelhardt, Entering the Intelligence Labyrinth
One Caveat:

“Since 9/11 (which might be considered the intelligence equivalent of original sin when it comes to missing the mark), what exactly are the triumphs of a system the likes of which the world has never seen before? “

No, Tom.

He buys into the “intelligence failure” myth of September 11th. There was no failure. There was high treason. That is a very, and categorically, different interpretation of what happened.

Readers here should know two things like the backs of their hands, as I’ve repeated them often enough:

1. “Fifty, five-oh, CIA personnel knew” about the San Diego hijacker cell, straight from the mouth of Richard Clarke. Including George Tenet, the CIA Director. Yet they allowed the attacks to happen.

2. The cover-up of Saudi Arabian government material aid to the hijackers is “aid and comfort” to the enemy, or high treason in the parlance of the US Constitution, which all of  these monkeys take an oath to defend. Protecting Saudis is treason. Case closed. Arrest the president, the former president and their co-conspirators on down.

The “Big Lie,” in the view of Adolf Hitler and friends, was that the lie had to be so audacious and so monumental that regular people could not conceive of telling it themselves.  And here we are.