Posts Tagged ‘agents provocateurs’
Tags: agents provocateurs, entrapment, false flag, fbi, Muslim, provocateurs, setups, sting, target, terror, terrorism, video, Youtube
Tags: agents provocateurs, bombers, boston bombing, Chechens, contact, control, fbi, stings, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, terrorism, Tony Cartalucci, Wall Street Journal, Zubeidat K. Tsarnaeva
Wall Street Journal reports prior contact by FBI with the older brother suspected of setting off bombs at the 2013 Boston Marathon.
Why is the FBI admitting this? Because the interview was “at the request of the Russian government” and therefore known to outside parties:
“The Federal Bureau of Investigation interviewed suspected marathon bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev in 2011 at the request of the Russian government, but didn’t find evidence of suspicious activity and closed the case, an FBI official said Friday.”
If this plot wasn’t thickening up enough yet, now we have notifications by the Russian government to consider and inquire about. What did the Russians tell US intelligence? Why were they so interested in Tamerlan Tsarnaev that they would request FBI assistance?
We know the two bombing suspect’s mother claims that FBI was in repeated contact with both her and had monitored the two sons for five or six years — directly contradicting the Wall Street Journal’s reported FBI statement that they “closed the case” implying that was the end of it:
“Zubeidat K. Tsarnaeva, the mother of Boston bombing suspects Dzhokar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev … ”He was controlled by the FBI for five years,” she said.”They knew what my son was doing, they knew what sites on the Internet he was going [to], they used to come…and talk to me…they were telling me that he was a serious leader and they were afraid of him.”
“They were talking to my son, and they called me officially and they told me that my son is an excellent boy and they have no problem with him,” she added. “At the same time, they were telling me that…he is getting information on really extremists…sites, so they were very, very afraid of him. So that’s why I think that this is a setup.”
The history of FBI sting operations in terrorism cases snice the 9/11 attacks shows that in every single “foiled plot” there was FBI infiltration and the use of agents provocateurs to “control” the perpetrators and to monitor their activities and prompt them to take violent actions. That is not an aberration, but what the FBI does, routinely, as revealed at multiple trials.
Is this the case of the plot that was for some reason not “foiled?”
Tags: agents provocateurs, G-20, G20, G8, Genoa, police brutality, Seattle, state sponsored terrorism, Toronto, violence
“Provocation and police terror at the G20 summit in Toronto”
“Ignorance is Strength”
(Your) ignorance is (their) strength. Such is modern propaganda.
Those looking at the ten second news blurbs of the protests in Toronto this week miss the story entirely. That would be most people, who are the targets of this staged propaganda.
With dramatic footage of burning police cars, most people are comfortably ignorant and don’t bother to inquire as to the basic facts:
Why were police cars abandoned for hours in the middle of the street?
Who set them on fire?
Why didn’t any of the thousands upon thousands of battle dressed cops stop the people from lighting them on fire?
Why didn’t anyone call the fire department?
Why were non-violent political demonstrators targeted for brutalization and arrest immediately after this event?
This is an old scenario, a tired and repeated scenario. In 2007, three Canadian police officers were caught red-handed dressed up as “black block anarchists” holding rocks, and about to attempt to cause a riot. These agents provocateurs were taken away, and never charged or heard from again, despite the Quebec police admitting that they were indeed working for the police.
Did you catch that?
The Canadian authorities admitted in 2007 that they used undercover agents provocateurs who were attempting to cause a riot — state sponsored terror against peaceful political demonstrators.
In a sane world, that would be big news, covered by all media until those responsible were brought down and charged with crimes.
In a sane world.
Agents provocateurs are a standard ingredient and they appear at all the major international economic summits. They have been spotted at Seattle in 1999 when rows of police stood by and did not intervene as supposed “black block anarchists” smashed a bunch of windows, thereby ushering in the crackdown against the large peaceful demonstrations, exactly as was done again this week in Toronto.
Agents provocateurs have been spotted in Genoa in 2001 and in Greece, as well as a number of other incidents around the world. Also spotted at these major summits is the excessive police violence against demonstrators and violations of their civil liberties.
As this practice has been admitted to by the Canadian government, we must ask what exactly happened this week in Toronto and who is responsible?
The use of agents provocateurs is a direct attack on the people, an attack on one’s own population. It is highly dangerous and it corrupts the police force with brainwashing techniques designed to foster an “us vs. them” mentality. These police state measures, while effective, are immoral and one would hope patently illegal. Civil liberties are still supposed to carry some weight and the force of law. State terrorism against those who exercise the right of free speech should be punishable by long jail terms. Abuses of trust and power of this magnitude cannot go unchallenged, even if the corporate news whores refuse to cover the issue.
Agents provocateurs are not a new phenomenon. A poignant film from 1969 entitled Z shows a plausible scenario where they are used in Paris, but their assault backfires. It’s a tense political drama, and worth a look.