Washington Post exposing CIA?
Basically what we already knew: the CIA is full of shit, and cannot be trusted to tell anyone the truth about anything, not even its own officers…
Beyond the internal distrust implied by the practice, officials said there is no clear mechanism for labeling eyewash cables or distinguishing them from legitimate records being examined by the CIA’s inspector general, turned over to Congress or declassified for historians.
Now I want you to try and analyze this information, in light of clear revelations that the CIA deceives people, including its own workforce. There’s what the CIA employees THOUGHT they were doing by hiding the 9/11 hijackers, and then what they ACTUALLY were doing…
Counter-terrorism Advisor to the White House (“Terror Czar”) Richard A. Clarke:
“It’s not as I originally thought, which was that one lonely CIA analyst got this information and didn’t somehow recognize the significance of it. No, fifty, 5-0, CIA personnel knew about this. Among the fifty people in CIA who knew these guys were in the country was the CIA director.”
“Unless someone intervened to stop the normal automatic distribution, I would automatically get it… For me to this day it is inexplicable why, when I had every other detail about everything related to terrorism, that the director didn’t tell me, that the director of the counter-terrorism center didn’t tell me, that the other 48 people inside CIA that knew about it never mentioned it to me or anyone in my staff in a period of over 12 months… We therefore conclude that there was a high-level decision inside CIA ordering people not to share that information.”
“There was not a lack of information sharing. They told us everything – except this.”
“THIS” = Hijackers living in San Diego for 16 months prior to 9/11, the people who allegedly flew a plane into the Pentagon on Sepbember 11th, 2001.