They’re lying about it across the political spectrum, hoping you won’t read the actual document. I’m still analyzing it. The language is diplomatic throughout, using “may have” repeatedly when repeating what the FBI plainly found, no maybe about it. We need the original FBI documents as well, and we need INDICTMENTS & PROSECUTIONS.
But it is also a far more substantial document than many American and Saudi officials — from the White House press secretary to some members of Congress to the Saudi foreign minister — tried to indicate in a flurry of news conferences and emailed news releases on Friday afternoon.
Article goes on to print the lies of the fraudulent 9/11 Commission:
The commission’s final report, released in 2004, said that the panel had found no evidence that the “Saudi government as an institution, or senior Saudi officials individually funded” Al Qaeda.
The Saudis deny everything, but no one asks them about Bandar’s claim to have been following the hijackers “with precision.”
They already have a cover-story in place, from the start. If all else fails, the Saudis will claim to have been following the hijackers in order to monitor them. CIA knew they were in the country and did NOTHING to simply GO ARREST THEM. The real story is CIA, George Tenet and the Bush junta. The Saudis are a minor loose end left hanging from this high Treason.
The corporate news won’t tell you the truth. They merely parrot he said / he said, as if that was investigative journalism.
The NY Post handles it a bit differently…
A CIA memorandum dated July 2, 2002, stated unequivocally that the connections found between the hijackers, the Saudi embassy in Washington and Saudi consulate in Los Angeles are “incontrovertible evidence that there is support for these terrorists within the Saudi government.”
“Numerous” FBI files also fingered two Saudi government employees who assisted the 9/11 hijackers as “Saudi intelligence officers,” the newly declassified documents reveal.