Noam Chomsky and his smug, empty-headed cheerleaders have been making waves this week, apparently a full-blown conspiracy-theorist now. This is after Chomsky fucked up the US left for fifty years, denying the realities of the JFK hit and 9/11 attack, which was clearly allowed to proceed despite mountains of warnings. Noam completely ignores that the CIA knew the purported hijackers were inside the country for over a year! Where there’s smoke there’s fire.
But Noam would have none of it. Indignation and apathy were his M.O.
All that was pre-Trump, however. The rule book has been burned. Yes, Noam a false flag attack is a possibility. Of course it is. It always was. But since you had no interest in all the evidence, why should anyone care what you have to say at all? Phantom future attacks? By whom?
The people who can perpetrate a false flag attack are in intelligence, not in Trump’s parade of incompetent clowns. The intelligence apparatus has been not-too-subtly at war with Trump for months, over his Russia policy. They want Russia steamrolled back to Moscow, even risking nuclear holocaust to get there. Trump, for whatever reasons, likely corrupt business relations, didn’t want to antagonize the world’s other big nuclear power. He is out of step with the NATO encroachment agenda, and the CIA and their neocon warlords hate him for it.
So, is Chomsky simply stating the obvious?
We always live under the threat of false flag terrorism. The CIA pioneered it since the 1950s. Rulers capitalize on it, and so they are (always) motivated to get away with murder and Treason. See Operation Gladio.
That reality never changed. Only Chomsky’s (apparent) awakening is different. Like a thought leader of drones, his new affinity for the concept of false flag terror permeates through the left gatekeepers this week, those usual suspects. Sort of validates my entire critique, huh, Noam?
You ready for that debate yet?