Posts Tagged ‘9/11 attacks’

Abby Martin remembers, and reposted this video:

“The unanswered questions largely remain unanswered.”
-Senator Bob Graham on 9/11 cover-up

See also:

9/11 & 28 Pages of Treason

I’ve been studying this issue for 20 years and have never seen this footage. Wasn’t big news on TV, and certainly its debunking never got aired.

This is the crux of 9/11 high Treason. Tenet says “no one read” the cable. The CIA’s own database revealed more than 50 people read the cable. It’s in the 2005 CIA Inspector General’s report. That’s blatant Treason, Aid and Comfort to the enemy. They let them do it and never notified anyone that Al Qaeda cells were INSIDE THE COUNTRY.

I REPEAT.

INSIDE THE COUNTRY.

FOR OVER A YEAR.

THE CIA KNEW THAT.

NOW YOU KNOW IT TOO.



What neither Maté nor Dore understand is that 9/11 exposed Amy Goodman and the entire fake “left” foundation-funded media complex. They were now on the side of the CIA and censoring out dissenters. People like Chomsky set the tone and–generally–no one who disagreed was allowed to challenge their orthodoxy.

DN did allow on a couple of 9/11 skeptics:

The theologian David Ray Griffin was allowed on but set up with an adversarial attack dog, which he was not informed about beforehand. It was a gotcha hit piece to discredit Griffin on the air, not to examine the massive amount of information he had written about. The headline says it all: “Debate,” which he didn’t know he was there to debate in the first place.

The Israeli angle was explored at DN one time as well, when they had on Christopher Ketcham six years after the attacks. The spin wasn’t that the Israelis were in any way complicit in the attacks, but they were only “Tracking the Hijackers,” which is the quasi-official fairy tale.

Yesterday, the Gray Zone released some interesting stuff about Anwar al Malaki and George Tenet demanding he be released from prison in Yemen in 2001–the year of the 9/11 attacks.

The Awlaki Wikipedia page actually has a ton of info on his career as a terrorist.

Anwar al-Awlaki

FBI agents identified al-Awlaki as a known, important “senior recruiter for al Qaeda”, and a spiritual motivator.[69][109] His name came up in a dozen terrorism plots in the US, UK, and Canada. The cases included suicide bombers in the 2005 London bombings, radical Islamic terrorists in the 2006 Toronto terrorism case, radical Islamic terrorists in the 2007 Fort Dix attack plot, the jihadist killer in the 2009 Little Rock military recruiting office shooting, and the 2010 Times Square bomber. In each case the suspects were devoted to al-Awlaki’s message, which they listened to online and on CDs.

The people who let 9/11 happen

Leaks show CIA pressured Yemen to release al-Qaeda leader and agency asset Anwar al-Awlaki

It’s about GEORGE TENET and his connection to Awlaki, as released by the current Houthi government of Yemen.

Only, the author doesn’t seem to understand that George Tenet was the key man who deliberately allowed the 9/11 attacks to succeed. The author, Rubinstein, either believes the convoluted CIA official narrative or he has to pretend he does at the Gray Zone. Either way, he relies on the 9/11 Commission Report as if that was the Bible and not “set up to fail” according to two of its “Chairmen.”

More:

Houthi media says al-Shami “pointed out that the Americans used to train their [Al Qaeda] individuals in Yemen and send them abroad to carry out operations for them, and then affix the accusation to Yemen as an excuse to come under the cover of fighting those individuals.”

A 1998 document from the State Department strongly suggests the US was interested in establishing a military presence in Yemen around the sea of Aden.


My problem with films like these is that they are made by and for highly ignorant people, who don’t really know anything about the 9/11 attacks. They walk away feeling like experts, while having investigated essentially nothing, except the discrepancies in that one guy’s case. In the big scheme, this story has nothing to do with understanding the attacks at all. Nothing.

wtc

 

We now know the name of an official enemy who attacked America on 9/11/01, which our own government has covered up for nearly 20 years. This is not in any way hyperbole.

Musaed Ahmed al-Jarrah

“Starting in the mid-1990s, Jarrah worked as the deputy chief of the Islamic affairs section of the Saudi Embassy in Washington. He left the United States in 2005, after coming under FBI scrutiny because of his suspected ties to other Saudis linked to Al Qaeda, former bureau officials said.”

 

U.S. Attorney General William Barr has twice argued in federal court statements that the Saudi diplomat’s name and other information from the FBI investigation of the plot constitute “state secrets” that would imperil the nation’s security if they became public. The FBI, the CIA and the Director of National Intelligence submitted a flurry of declarations endorsing that claim.

The Justice Department Accidentally Released the Name of Saudi Official Suspected of Helping the 9/11 Hijackers

 

“This proves it’s a giant cover-up to protect the Saudis.”

Trump-Caligula copy

“AID & COMFORT”

 

Attorney General Barr Refuses to Release 9/11 Documents to Families of the Victims

suesaudiweb-1

it was Khashoggi himself who had been ‘employed by the Saudi intelligence services to try to persuade bin Laden to make peace with the Saudi royal family.’ Khashoggi was ‘the only non-royal Saudi who had the beef on the royals’ intimate dealing with al Qaida in the lead-up to the 9/11 attacks.’
Who really was Jamal Khashoggi?

al-Qaeda militants, many of which also had direct ties to MBS’ father, the incumbent King Salman. These intelligence agencies had concluded that in the 1990s, Salman controlled with an ‘iron fist’ the key financial operations of a range of charities (such as the Saudi High Commission, the Third World Relief Agency and the International Islamic Relief Organisation) which had been found systematically diverting hundreds of millions of dollars to al-Qaida militants. Several 9/11 hijackers had trained in camps funded by this cash.

By some accounts, Prince Turki al-Faisal’s relationship with bin Laden continued up to 9/11. According to the French daily Le Figaro, French intelligence sources claimed that two months before 9/11, bin Laden was flown to the American hospital in Dubai for kidney treatment under Prince Turki’s patronage, where the al-Qaida chief met CIA officials.

2017-06-21T034548Z_1519111080_RC1F77235D20_RTRMADP_3_SAUDI-SUCCESSION-SON-1-630x378

an attorney representing families and survivors of the 9/11 attack stated Khashoggi may have been murdered because of what he knew about 9/11.

 

Saudi murders in Pensacola revive 9/11′s unanswered questions

James Kreindler said Khashoggi, who was killed at the Saudi embassy in Istanbul in 2018, had met with an investigator with the 9/11 plaintiffs in 2017 and “knew a lot about the Saudi government’s involvement” in the terror attacks.

“My belief,” Kreindler added, “is that Khashoggi was killed not because he was a dissident, there are lots of dissidents, but because he was holding this ax over the Saudis’ heads.”

Kreindler is apparently the attorney suing Saudi Arabia for the victim’s families.

Problems:

  1. Comments are turned off. No additional info allowed.
  2. Alleged 9/11 hijackers lived and trained at a Florida military base including the PENSACOLA AIR BASE! USA Today either doesn’t know this or isn’t allowed to make the connection:

Mohamed Atta at Maxwell Air Force Base

overviewAccording to a flurry of stories between Sept 15 and 17 (2001) in the Washington Post, Newsweek, and Knight Ridder newspapers, as many as six of the terrorists, including ringleader Mohammed Atta, received training at U.S. military facilities.

“U.S. military sources have given the FBI information that suggests five of the alleged hijackers of the planes used in Tuesday’s terror attacks received training at secure U.S. military installations in the 1990’s,” Newsweek reported. Newsweek also reported that three of the hijackers received training at the Pensacola Naval Station in Florida.

…The Senator had received no reply to his request. “Speaking for Senator Nelson,” concluded the spokesman, “we still do not know if three of the terrorists trained at one time in Pensacola or not.”

The FBI took a powder: Things you never knew about 9/11

 

Newsweek, September 14, 2001:

ALLEGED HIJACKERS MAY HAVE TRAINED AT U.S. BASES

Three of the alleged hijackers listed their address on drivers licenses and car registrations as the Naval Air Station in Pensacola, Fla.-known as the “Cradle of U.S. Navy Aviation,” according to a high-ranking U.S. Navy source.

Another of the alleged hijackers may have been trained in strategy and tactics at the Air War College in Montgomery, Ala., said another high-ranking Pentagon official. The fifth man may have received language instruction at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Tex. Both were former Saudi Air Force pilots who had come to the United States, according to the Pentagon source.