9/11 Truth just went mainstream, 16 years late?
JASTA moves forward:
Don’t buy into NBC’s mind numbing spin. These are the facts of 9/11 as we know them today:
Never accept the editorializing of corporate shills. Ever.
File under unfuckingbelievable:
Vets felt shock and anger when they found out they were duped into doing “the Saudis’ dirty work,” as one put it.
Every American needs to know what is already public about Saudi government sponsorship of the September 11th attacks. They wouldn’t be “duped” into such stupidity if they simply read:
I made the hypnotized army in my novel TRANSFIXION a type of “dupe.” That is the slang pejorative used by the resisters. They call them “dupes,” and “puppets” and similar smears as part of their battlefield banter. No accident.
“NIST had reached a predetermined conclusion that refused, avoided and dismissed the evidence.”
– Peter Michael Ketcham, former NIST employee
Big Lie 9/11
“Incomplete and nonsensical explanations”
You can probably guess my view on this one. Or maybe not, because it’s so anger-filled at the moment.
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is paying at least one large public relations firm in Washington, D.C. to recruit American military veterans who will agree to visit Capitol Hill to tell members of Congress — in person — that they oppose a new federal law allowing civil lawsuits against state sponsors of terrorism.
Saudi Arabia’s government also appears to be funding luxurious, all-expenses-paid trips to Washington, D.C. for the veterans which include stays at the $500-per-night Trump International Hotel.
The law is the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA), which creates a way for American citizens to file civil claims against foreign governments for deaths and other damage related to terrorist acts if the foreign governments financed those attacks.
Jimmy Dore addressed this in his podcast. When he did, it dawned on me why Barack Obama may have done this. This is a hypothetical…
“Jimmy – Let me play devil’s advocate for a second.
Heather dot Carpenter at thomsonreuters dot com
I am heartened by Reuters’ policy of fairness and impartiality in the age of Trump. Fifteen years ago I had to personally enter the game because the September 11th attacks were not being honestly reported by America’s newsrooms. Those attacks have arguably given us everything that has followed since.
Specifically, it is no longer unknowable that members of the US administration committed Treason in deliberately allowing the attacks to proceed. The 28 (29) redacted pages of the Joint Inquiry tie the government of Saudi Arabia directly to the hijackers through numerous connections. The US administrations which have aided and abetted in that cover-up have committed Treason. This is undisputable. It is not, however, the narrative that US corporate media is allowed to tell its audience.
We know that the CIA was well aware of the San Diego Al Qaeda cell for 16 months prior to the attacks. This cell allegedly flew a hijacked plane into the Pentagon. The CIA admitted in 2005 it knew about the men, and despite warnings of “spectacular attacks” and George Tenet claiming his “hair was on fire” absolutely nothing was done to arrest the cell members. This is hidden in plain sight. They simply rebranded the incident as “information sharing” rather than “hiding hijackers from the FBI.”
Richard Clarke accused George Tenet of what is essentially Treason, but this wasn’t covered at all by US corporate media.
As you can imagine, once the Project for a New American Century designs for a “new Pearl Harbor” were approved to move forward all bets were off as to what specfically happened that day. PNAC members included Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld (who did absolutely nothing to defend the country during the actual attack) and the president’s brother Jeb.
We know one thing for certain: that the malfeasance was intentional and helped the Saudis succeed in many ways. If you are true to your statement to investigate the most important events then you must have a team devoted to investigating 9/11 high Treason.