Posts Tagged ‘9/11’

jeb10

I emailed Daniel Hopsicker to provide more detail a couple weeks ago (Aug 19th) about that Jeb Bush/9/11 connection. Hopsicker has now named the Venice police sergeant who told him about Bush the day after the September 11th attacks…

“According to Sergeant Marty (Mike) Treanor and other law enforcement officials in Sarasota Florida, the files pertaining to 9/11 hijacker pilots Marwan Al-Shehhi and Mohamed Atta from Huffman Aviation Flight School in Venice Florida were loaded onto two Ryder trucks and driven onto a C-130 cargo plane which left Sarasota the day after 9/11,”

Jeb Bush’s 9/11 Problem

“The FBI took all our files, everything. They loaded the files right outside this window,” Treanor said, indicating the parking lot outside the station, ‘into two Ryder trucks, then drove them onto a C-130 military cargo plane at the Sarasota airport, which took off for Washington with Jeb Bush aboard”

In addition to confirming Jeb Bush’s presence on the plane, he had one other piece of startling, and dispiriting, news. Everyone I’d spoken to with knowledge of the flight had assumed the files from Huffman Aviation, and the criminal records of the Venice Police Department, were being flown to FBI Headquarters in Washington, D.C.

The FBI never got them. The files never got there. They were diverted to McLean Virginia.

096_omar_al_bayoumiOmar Al Bayoumi, Saudi Arabian Agent, helped 9/11 hijackers in San Diego

“DECLASSIFY 28 PAGES ON FOREIGN GOVERNMENT FINANCING OF THE 9/11 HIJACKERS”.

Spread this widely. Needs 100K signatures in the next couple weeks.

a262_ali_mohamed_passport_2050081722-9872

Peter Dale Scott examines the US / Saudi nexis and the abundance of Saudi terrorists that have mysteriously slipped through the cracks, somehow.

US Government “Protection” of Al-Qaeda Terrorists

wtc7debris

Barely…

Much of the day turned on what exactly we know about a February 2000 chat between alleged Saudi spies Omar al Bayoumi and Fahad al Thumairy. Judge Daniels had no time for Saudi Arabia’s contention that it didn’t “technically” employ Bayoumi when it paid his salary for a no-show cover job. But at the heart of the Saudi spy plot posited by the 9/11 families, the judge seemed to struggle with the obvious.

“You don’t have any evidence as to what conversations [Thumairy] had with Bayoumi,” said Daniels. “What’s the factual basis for you to allege that when he met with Bayoumi he said, ‘Give lodging to the hijackers, assist them and give financial support to the hijackers so that they can carry out the 9/11 attacks?’”

What one spy said to the other can be inferred from the full circumstantial evidence, replied 9/11 attorney Sean Carter of Cozen O’Connor—and must be. Consider the timing and sequence of these events, as laid out by the plaintiffs.

Osama bin Laden sent the 9/11 hijackers Nawaf al Hazmi and Khalid al Mihdhar to Los Angeles in mid-January 2000 knowing that they didn’t speak a word of English and would be helpless on their own. Two weeks later, the Saudi spy Bayoumi met with the Islamist diplomat-imam Thumairy at the Saudi consul’s Islamic Affairs section, which the FBI knew to serve as Saudi Arabia’s radical Islamist fifth column.

Bayoumi drove straight from this not-so-mysterious chat to meet the two hijackers at Thumairy’s mosque. Three days later, Bayoumi moved the two hijackers into his own family apartment in San Diego. Bayoumi proceeded to open bank accounts and rent new apartments for the hijackers with his own money. Bayoumi connected the hijackers with another alleged Saudi agent who procured them fake IDs and admission to language and flight school. Bayoumi’s wife allegedly channeled $150,000 in support payments from a Saudi princess to the hijackers. In early 2000 Bayoumi received a promotion at his no-show cover job, and a significant raise in the salary and stipend covered by the kingdom. Over the same three months, he talked repeatedly by phone with Saudi diplomats in Los Angeles and D.C., not to mention the hijackers’ San Diego imam Anwar Aulaqi, who went on to become a senior al-Qaida leader.

saudi-bush-presstv

Kevin Ryan sums up:
Fourteen Incredible Facts About 9/11

As the 14th anniversary of 9/11 approaches, it’s important to remind people that we still don’t know what happened that day.

What is known about 9/11 is that there are many incredible facts that continue to be ignored by the government and the mainstream media. Here are fourteen.

An outline of what was to become the 9/11 Commission Report was produced before the investigation began. The outline was kept secret from the
Commission’s staff and appears to have determined the outcome of the investigation.

The 9/11 Commission claimed sixty-three (63) times in its Report that itcould find “no evidence” related to important aspects of the crimes.

One person, Shayna Steiger, issued 12 visas to the alleged hijackers in Saudi Arabia. Steiger issued some of the visas without interviewing the applicants and fought with another employee at the embassy who tried to prevent her lax approach.

Before 9/11, the nation’s leading counter-terrorism expert repeatedly notified his friends in the United Arab Emirates of top-secret U.S. plans to capture Osama bin Laden. These treasonous leaks prevented Bin Laden’s capture on at least two separate occasions.

Former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger was caught stealing documents from the National Archives that had been requested by the 9/11 Commission. The Commission had previously been denied access to the documents but the White House reluctantly agreed to turn them over just as Berger was trying to steal them..

The official story of the failed air defenses on 9/11 was changed several times and, in the end, paradoxically exonerated the military by saying that the military had lied many times about its response. The man who was behind several of the changing accounts was a specialist in political warfare (i.e. propaganda).

Military exercises being conducted on the day of 9/11 mimicked the attacks as they were occurring and obstructed the response to the attacks. NORAD commander Ralph Eberhart sponsored those exercises, failed to do his job that day, and later lied to Congress about it (if the 9/11 Commission account is true).

third skyscraper collapsed late in the afternoon on 9/11. This was WTC 7, a 47-story building that the government’s final report says fell into its own footprint due to office fires. The building’s tenants included U.S. intelligence agencies and a company led in part by Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney.Meetings were scheduled there to discuss terrorism and explosives on the morning of 9/11.

News agencies, including BBC and CNN, announced the destruction of WTC 7 long before it happened. One BBC reporter announced the collapse while viewers could see the still-standing building right behind her in the video. Years later, after claiming that it had lost the tapes and then found them again, BBC’s answer to this astonishing report was that everything was just “confusing and chaotic” that day. Of course, one problem with this is that the news agencies predicted the exact building, of the many damaged in the area, that would collapse. Another big problem is that no one could have possibly predicted the collapse of WTC 7 given the unprecedented and unbelievable official account for how that happened.

Construction of the new, 52-story WTC 7 was completed two years before the government knew what happened to the first WTC 7. In fact, when the new building was completed in 2006, the spokesman for the government investigation said, “We’ve had trouble getting a handle on building No. 7.” The construction of the new building, without regard for how the first one was destroyed, indicates that building construction professionals in New York City did not believe it could ever happen again.

Ultimately, building construction codes were not changed as a result of the root causes cited by the National Institute for Standards and Technology for destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings. This fact shows that the international building construction community does not believe that the WTC buildings were destroyed as stated in the official account.

AMEC, the company that just finished rebuilding the exact spot where Flight 77 was said to hit, was put in charge of cleanup at the WTC and the Pentagon. The man who ran the company, Peter Janson, was a long-time business associate of Donald Rumsfeld.

The response of the U.S. Secret Service to the 9/11 attacks suggests foreknowledge of the events in that the agency failed to protect the presidentfrom the obvious danger posed by terrorists.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission notified the FBI of suspected 9/11 insider trading transactions. That evidence was ignored and the suspects were not even questioned by the FBI or the 9/11 Commission.

There are, of course, many more incredible facts about 9/11 that continue to be ignored by the authorities and much of the media.

Kevin Ryan blogs at Dig Within.

mark-serious-suit-500nu-background

FBI Whistleblower: The CIA Could’ve Easily Stopped 9/11 If They Wanted

Treason.

Don’t believe Richard Clarke’s speculation as to why they did it. They did it intentionally, or else they wouldn’t have had their “New Pearl Harbor” and their “War on Terror.”

pic_visa_5

…Of course he does.

Obama Warns the Senate to Pass Surveillance Law

“Heaven forbid we’ve got a problem where we could have prevented a terrorist attack or apprehended someone who was engaged in dangerous activity, but we didn’t do so simply because of inaction in the Senate,” Mr. Obama added.

Unless the 4th Amendment to the Constitution is shredded, Obama predicts more terror attacks. Such a bullshit fearmongering campaign. The attacks we’ve had so far should have been prevented, but were not due to state complicity. We had 9/11, where “fifty CIA personnel” knew that two hijackers were living in San Diego for 16 months, and yet did absolutely nothing about it. We had the Boston Bombing where the FBI received direct threat warnings from Russia’s FSB about Tsarnaev, and then inexplicably pretended they didn’t know who he was, begging the public to identify the guy they had already interviewed and had international warnings about.

The issue isn’t collecting everyone’s phone calls. The issue is a criminal “deep state” that likes it when terrorist attacks happen because it gives them more power: power to eradicate Constitutional protections, power to wage wars of aggression, power to destroy the competition around the world in the mad dash for scarce resources.  There is plenty wrong with this picture, and we don’t even get the basic sketch of it in the mainstream corporate lie factories.

Let’s not forget that Obama TO THIS DAY is covering up the 28 pages that show Saudi Arabian high officials were complicit in the 9/11 attacks. To this day Obama commits treason, giving “Aid and Comfort” to the Saudi officials who helped attack America, thus launching this fraudulent “war on terrorism.” The US intelligence services had all the information they needed, including legitimate NSA surveillance of an Al Qaeda phone hub in Yemen, which told them exactly who the terrorists were — AND DID NOTHING TO STOP THE ATTACK!!!

We are living on the other side of the mirror, people. Delusion has replaced facts. Myth replaced evidence. They have betrayed us, and they continue to betray us. What they are doing right now is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, that document that gives them all their power. They ignore its limitations. They scaremonger the public in order to get away with destroying the Constitution which they have sworn to protect. They are the real enemies of “America” which looks less and less like America each year, and more like a fascist police state.