Posts Tagged ‘Aaron Maté’

McCarthyite meltdown shows how Russiagate, Syria propaganda captured ‘left’ media

Cenk Fatturk and Ana lie repeatedly without consequence. They repeatedly try and claim that they are the arbiters of what is “progressive,” a compromised, useless label that should be rejected.

A “progressive” is an imperialistic, Democratic Party bitch, and should not be trusted on any issue. They have betrayed every promise they have made and always support the corporatocracy after gaining power in Congress. This is a big sham, and these people need to be replaced, not supported. Only a third party will have no strings attached to banksters and weapons manufacturers and oil companies…

It’s on, over at Twitter.

The TYT mob are attacking the honest journalists for disputing their imperial war propaganda. The Turds are looking for higher-paying jobs in corporate lie factories. Because their online shit show has lost all credibility.


2014: US allies “poured hundreds of millions of dollars & tens…thousands of tons of weapons into anyone who would fight against Assad. Except that the people who were being supplied were… Al-Qaeda and the extremist elements of jihadis.”

BIDEN obviously had no idea the CIA was orchestrating the whole thing, because he immediately had to “apologize” to Recep Erdoğan. Dumb V.P. not given that level of Clearance, and he thought he knew something.

Maté is in a Youtube war with Jabba the Hut impersonator Cenk Turkman. The fake “left” posers vs. journalism and truth. It’s all kind of obvious, unless you’re a zombie.

Cenk & Ana’s freedom fighters

PS

Associated Press building bombed by Israel. AP responds by firing reporter who criticized Israel in high school.

The hacker collective ANYONYMOUS revealed the sarin false flag operation in Dec. 2012. I’ve been covering it since.





What neither Maté nor Dore understand is that 9/11 exposed Amy Goodman and the entire fake “left” foundation-funded media complex. They were now on the side of the CIA and censoring out dissenters. People like Chomsky set the tone and–generally–no one who disagreed was allowed to challenge their orthodoxy.

DN did allow on a couple of 9/11 skeptics:

The theologian David Ray Griffin was allowed on but set up with an adversarial attack dog, which he was not informed about beforehand. It was a gotcha hit piece to discredit Griffin on the air, not to examine the massive amount of information he had written about. The headline says it all: “Debate,” which he didn’t know he was there to debate in the first place.

The Israeli angle was explored at DN one time as well, when they had on Christopher Ketcham six years after the attacks. The spin wasn’t that the Israelis were in any way complicit in the attacks, but they were only “Tracking the Hijackers,” which is the quasi-official fairy tale.

You guys realize that if the US and Russia go to war everyone dies?