Posts Tagged ‘aid and comfort’

mark-serious-suit-500nu-background

FBI Whistleblower: The CIA Could’ve Easily Stopped 9/11 If They Wanted

Treason.

Don’t believe Richard Clarke’s speculation as to why they did it. They did it intentionally, or else they wouldn’t have had their “New Pearl Harbor” and their “War on Terror.”

150529171814-isis-threat-video-american-defector-tsr-dnt-todd-00003007-large-169

It’s getting difficult to read this shit. Straight from CNN, where if it ends up there that means it’s undeniable and exposed.

CNN: 

ISIS fighter was trained by State Department

Another ISIS commander, whom we never did hear about on CNN, was also trained by the US:

mujahid02

ISIS Iraq Commander Trained by U.S.A!

Begging the question, what the fuck is the United States doing to Asia?

1-NfDqkRThJ_MkptkSZVtC1Q

Anti-ISIS coalition knowingly sponsored violent extremists to ‘isolate’ Assad, rollback ‘Shia expansion’

Western governments deliberately allied with al-Qaeda and other Islamist extremist groups to topple Syrian dictator Bashir al-Assad.

Nafeez Ahmed:

The revelations contradict the official line of Western governments on their policies in Syria, and raise disturbing questions about secret Western support for violent extremists abroad, while using the burgeoning threat of terror to justify excessive mass surveillance and crackdowns on civil liberties at home.

…Further on, the document reveals that Pentagon analysts were acutely aware of the dire risks of this strategy, yet ploughed ahead anyway.

“Throughout the early years of the Syria crisis, the US and UK governments, and almost universally the West’s mainstream media, promoted Syria’s rebels as moderate, liberal, secular, democratic, and therefore deserving of the West’s support. Given that these documents wholly undermine this assessment, it’s significant that the West’s media has now, despite their immense significance, almost entirely ignored them.”

“…instead of clearly delineating the group as an enemy, the report envisions the terror group as a US strategic asset.”

“…contrary to Western government claims, the primary cause of the threat comes from their own deeply misguided policies of secretly sponsoring Islamist terrorism for dubious geopolitical purposes.

MORE:

West’s death squad strategy: How and why ISIS & Al-Qaeda became ‘shock troops’ of global powers

Fighters of al-Qaeda linked Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant parade at Syrian town of Tel AbyadHeckuva Job

More evidence that the US government knew exactly what it was doing helping ISIS get started in Syria and directly helping AL QAEDA “return to its old pockets in Mosul and Ramadi and will provide a renewed momentum under the presumption of unifying the Jihad…”

Screen-Shot-2015-05-22-at-16.58.54-1024x466

This is from the United States Defense Intelligence Agency, DIA, 2012. (PDF)

Let’s confirm Barack Obama’s DIRECT support for terrorists, as per an August 2013 telephone call with Turkey’s Erdogan:

The White House:

Readout of President Obama’s Call with Prime Minister Erdogan of Turkey

President Obama spoke by phone today from California with Prime Minister Erdogan of Turkey, at the Prime Minister’s request, about developments in Syria and Egypt.  The President and Prime Minister discussed the danger of foreign extremists in Syria and agreed on the importance of supporting a unified and inclusive Syrian opposition. 

Obama has admitted to supporting “extremists in Syria,” which are the Jihadi terrorists, Al Qaeda. That’s who they are. This is a direct admission of material support to Al Qaeda — arguably HIGH TREASON. Obama should have been impeached and removed from office so many times, but this is absurd, fun house mirror bullshit.

cq5dam.web.1280.1280

Obama Administration knew of arms being shipped from Benghazi to Syria

Judicial Watch has gotten documents confirming that weapons were being sent from Benghazi to Syria to aid the ISIS/Al Qaeda linked rebels. That was the purpose of their CIA operation in Benghazi. That was what Americans were actually doing there.

183181-libya-weapons

The DOD documents also contain the first official documentation that the Obama administration knew that weapons were being shipped from the Port of Benghazi to rebel troops in Syria. An October 2012 report confirms:

Weapons from the former Libya military stockpiles were shipped from the port of Benghazi, Libya to the Port of Banias and the Port of Borj Islam, Syria. The weapons shipped during late-August 2012 were Sniper rifles, RPG’s, and 125 mm and 155mm howitzers missiles.

During the immediate aftermath of, and following the uncertainty caused by, the downfall of the ((Qaddafi)) regime in October 2011 and up until early September of 2012, weapons from the former Libya military stockpiles located in Benghazi, Libya were shipped from the port of Benghazi, Libya to the ports of Banias and the Port of Borj Islam, Syria. The Syrian ports were chosen due to the small amount of cargo traffic transiting these two ports. The ships used to transport the weapons were medium-sized and able to hold 10 or less shipping containers of cargo.

The DIA document further details:

The weapons shipped from Syria during late-August 2012 were Sniper rifles, RPG’s and 125mm and 155mm howitzers missiles.  The numbers for each weapon were estimated to be: 500 Sniper rifles, 100 RPG launchers with 300 total rounds, and approximately 400 howitzers missiles [200 ea – 125mm and 200ea – 155 mm.]

The heavily redacted document does not disclose who was shipping the weapons.

Another DIA report, written in August 2012 (the same time period the U.S. was monitoring weapons flows from Libya to Syria), said that the opposition in Syria was driven by al Qaeda and other extremist Muslim groups: “the Salafist, the Muslim Brotherhood, and AQI are the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria.” The growing sectarian direction of the war was predicted to have dire consequences for Iraq, which included the “grave danger” of the rise of ISIS:

turki

Are we getting closer to the word “Treason?”

Bush family ties to terror suspects re-opened by 9/11 ’28 pages’

North Carolina Republican Congressman Walter Jones told the New Yorker last September, of the what is now commonly known as the “28 Pages”:

There’s nothing in it about national security…It’s about the Bush Administration and its relationship with the Saudis.

Congressman Thomas Massie, Republican, said:

“As I read it, and we all had our own experience, I had to stop every couple of pages and just sort of try to absorb and try to rearrange my understanding of history. “It challenges you to re-think everything. I think the whole country needs to go through that.”

Nytimes_hq

“White House officials say the administration has undertaken a review on whether to release the [28 redacted] pages but has no timetable for when they might be made public.” -NY Times

A convincing case can be made that Barack Obama decided to protect the Saudi sponsors of the September 11th attacks as soon as he won the presidency in 2008:

Justice Dept. Backs Saudi Royal Family on 9/11 Lawsuit

Obama literally had his “Justice” (sic) Department aid and abet the Saudi terror financiers and stood against the American victims of the 9/11 attacks. Obama sided with Saudi terrorists over US victims of 9/11, in one of the most shameful displays in the history of this country, something I will “never forget,” nor forgive. Obama betrayed America, as proven beyond any shadow of a doubt in the above link from May 29, 2009. But many, many people also betrayed America. The president is not alone there.

Today’s Times:

“[Senator Bob] Graham has repeatedly said it shows that Saudi Arabia was complicit in the Sept. 11 attacks. “The 28 pages primarily relate to who financed 9/11, and they point a very strong finger at Saudi Arabia as being the principal financier,” Mr. Graham said last month as he pressed for the pages to be made public.

NY Times, of course, allows Zelikow to LIE:

“Philip D. Zelikow, the executive director of the national commission that investigated the Sept. 11 attacks after the congressional panels, said the commission followed up on the allegations, using some of the same personnel who wrote them initially, but reached a different conclusion.”

Far from following up Zelikow FIRED a Commission staffer for simply getting a copy of the 28 pages and reading it. Where’s that part of the story, NY Times?

History Commons:

Two investigators on the 9/11 Commission, Mike Jacobson and Dana Leseman, compile a list of interviews they want to do to investigate leads indicating that two of the 9/11 hijackers, Khalid Almihdhar and Nawaf Alhazmi, were linked to elements of the Saudi government. The list is submitted to Philip Zelikow, the commission’s executive director, for approval. However, a few days later Zelikow replies that the twenty interviews requested is too much, and they can only do half the interviews. Leseman, a former Justice Department lawyer, is unhappy with this, as it is traditional to demand the widest range of documents and interviews early on, so that reductions can be made later in negotiations if need be.
‘We Need the Interviews’ – Leseman tells Zelikow that his decision is “very arbitrary” and “crazy,” adding: “Philip, this is ridiculous. We need the interviews. We need these documents. Why are you trying to limit our investigation?” Zelikow says that he does not want to overwhelm federal agencies with document and interview requests at an early stage of the investigation, but, according to author Philip Shenon, after this, “Zelikow was done explaining. He was not in the business of negotiating with staff who worked for him.”
More Conflicts – This is the first of several conflicts between Zelikow and Leseman, who, together with Jacobson, had been on the staff of the 9/11 Congressional Inquiry and had researched this issue there. Shenon will write: “Leseman was that rare thing on the commission: She was not afraid of Zelikow; she would not be intimidated by him. In fact, from the moment she arrived at the commission’s offices on K Street, she seemed to almost relish the daily combat with Zelikow, even if she wondered aloud to her colleagues why there had to be any combat at all.” [SHENON, 2008, PP. 109-111]
Later Fired, Evidence Deleted from Final Report – Zelikow will later fire Leseman from the commission for mishandling classified information (see April 2003and (April 2003)) and will have the evidence of the Saudi connection gathered by Jacobson and Leseman’s successor, Raj De, deleted from the main text of the commission’s report (see June 2004).

This is high treason. Not a “mistake.” This was intentional, deliberate aid to the 9/11 terrorists.

1409711480469_wps_3_epa04369790_A_damaged_air

 

Project Bojinka could be happening this time. Thank Obama and Co. for destroying Libya and empowering Jihadist lunatics to seize weapons and aircraft…

Officials warn ELEVEN missing airplanes in Libya could be used to carry out terrorist attack on 9/11 anniversary

 

If America is attacked with Libyan jetliners, Barack Obama and his high official co-conspirators should be tried for high treason. They directly aided and abetted Jihadist militias inside Libya in 2011. They bombed the government of Libya to put these Islamists in power.

 

pnac

 

“They are trying to stop me and others from telling the world what really happened that day.”
Ali Soufan, FBI Agent

This is about CIA treason on 9/11.

 

 

This is high treason, the highest treason there is.  Watch it.  Watch it again.  Watch it again.  Post it to social networks.

I don’t buy Richard Clarke’s exculpatory explanation.  There is no excuse for allowing 9/11 to happen after numerous warnings tipped off the US, including the Genoa warning of suicide skyjackings against Bush himself.  Richard Clarke says he has a “set of facts” but it’s also a very blinkered set of facts, and he’s not looking elsewhere at all the other evidence.

Gross Ignorance on 9/11

 

article-2610598-1D4500E400000578-425_634x419

The Citizens Committee on Benghazi released its interim findings on April 22, 2014 in Washington. Pictured are (L-R) Clare Lopez, Admiral (Ret.) Chuck Kubic, Admiral (Ret.) James ‘Ace’ Lyons, former CIA officer Wayne Simmons and civil rights attorney John Clarke

 

‘The White House and senior Congressional members,’ the group wrote in an interim report released Tuesday, ‘deliberately and knowingly pursued a policy that provided material support to terrorist organizations in order to topple a ruler [Muammar Gaddafi] who had been working closely with the West actively to suppress al-Qaeda.’

‘Some look at it as treason,’ said Wayne Simmons, a former CIA officer who participated in the commission’s research.”

UK DAILY MAIL:
Benghazi attack could have been prevented if US hadn’t ‘switched sides in the War on Terror’ and allowed $500 MILLION of weapons to reach al-Qaeda militants, reveals damning report

 

photo2

Al Qaeda flag 

saudi-bush-presstv

This is huge.

An attempt to [sue] Saudi Arabia in 2002 was blocked by a federal court ruling that said the kingdom had sovereign immunity. That ruling was reversed Thursday by a three-judge federal panel.

9/11 Families ‘Ecstatic’ They Can Finally Sue Saudi Arabia

 

Recall that Obama’s Justice (sic) Dept. helped the fucking Saudis weasel out of the lawsuit.  This put Mr. Slick firmly on the wrong side of the high treason question.  It remains to be seen what barriers will be erected next to thwart justice for the 9/11 attacks and to stop the truth from emerging.