Posts Tagged ‘amendment’

obama-rosen-screen

 

In flagrant and unlawful violation of the oath of office of the president, Obama persists in spying on Americans’ communications.

Guardian:

White House urges Congress to reject moves to curb NSA surveillance

“Obama administration alarmed by vote on ‘Amash amendment’ aimed at blocking blanket surveillance of phone records”

“Blanket surveillance” doesn’t need to be blocked.  It is a gross violation of the 4th Amendment.  Those knowingly participating in it should be ARRESTED IMMEDIATELY and brought in to testify against their bosses.

AMENDMENT 4

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

 

But there’s more to this massive criminal conspiracy and high treason:

ProPublica:

NSA Says It Can’t Search Its Own Emails

In response to a public records request, the super-snooping spy agency says it doesn’t have the technology.

 

we-the-people-logo-no-box

“Citizens United” decision challenged. Corporate personhood should be outlawed if this bill becomes law. I’m not a lawyer, and the complexity of affecting these changes may not be so readily apparent.  Here is the petition.

House Joint Resolution 29 introduced February 14, 2013

Section 1. [Artificial Entities Such as Corporations Do Not Have Constitutional Rights]

The rights protected by the Constitution of the United States are the rights of natural persons only.

Artificial entities established by the laws of any State, the United States, or any foreign state shall have no rights under this Constitution and are subject to regulation by the People, through Federal, State, or local law.

The privileges of artificial entities shall be determined by the People, through Federal, State, or local law, and shall not be construed to be inherent or inalienable.

Section 2. [Money is Not Free Speech]

Federal, State, and local government shall regulate, limit, or prohibit contributions and expenditures, including a candidate’s own contributions and expenditures, to ensure that all citizens, regardless of their economic status, have access to the political process, and that no person gains, as a result of their money, substantially more access or ability to influence in any way the election of any candidate for public office or any ballot measure.

Federal, State, and local government shall require that any permissible contributions and expenditures be publicly disclosed.

The judiciary shall not construe the spending of money to influence elections to be speech under the First Amendment.