Posts Tagged ‘BUK missile’

MH-17 Fraud: The Gaps

Posted: September 29, 2016 in -
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

CDQpviUVEAABdNc.jpg

Troubling Gaps in the New MH-17 Report

JIT operates under an agreement with the Ukrainian government that lets it veto the release of information. Ukraine’s SBU intelligence service, which represented the Kiev government in the JIT, also has among its official responsibilities the protection of secret information that could be damaging to Ukraine.

The preponderance of evidence is that the neo-nazi coup regime deliberately shot down the airliner to try and pin it on their enemies, the eastern Ukrainian separatists and Russia. The cover-up implies whom the perpetrators actually were, as usual.

 

1425472215246.cached

Shards of Truth in MH17 Investigation (But not at Daily Beast)

Doing what the Dutch investigation has so far declined to do – smear the separatists and Russia – the “Daily Beast” comes up with a belated hit piece, adding exactly nothing new, but taking the opportunity to repeat the US propaganda line…

‘How can you tell it’s a smear job,’ you ask?

The one link to any opposing ideas goes to a discredited piece of obvious disinformation, that infamous Photoshopped picture of an attacking plane. DB uses the smarmy jibe, “as some Russian media claimed,” to pretend they’ve actually looked at both sides of the debate. They have not and will not.

My response there won’t post, so I’m annoyed. Perhaps they have my email and/or IP address on their list as well. But their site won’t put it through, not in Chrome, Opera nor Microsoft Internet Explorer.

So here’s my fuck-you to the Daily Beast:

Propaganda laden bs. The Russian claims of a jet fighter are not because of that bit of photographic disinformation you link to. That was FUD.

The presence of a Ukraine jet fighter was seen by the eyewitnesses on the ground, who were, and are, CENSORED by the BBC (and here as well):

https://politicalfilm.wordpress.com/2014/10/21/censored-bbc-mh-17-eyewitnesses/

Further, two Russian radar monitoring stations tracked the fighter plane as it intercepted the jetliner:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KSpeo5RcQQo

The Russian organization of engineers finds the air to air — not surface to air — scenario more likely as no one saw or recorded any evidence of a BUK missile. The vapor trail lasts in the sky for up to 10 minutes and is visible for 40km.

https://politicalfilm.wordpress.com/2014/10/23/mh-17-the-untold-story/

They also tested the 30mm cannon of an SU-25 on planes and found similar damage to what is visible at the cockpit of the wreckage.

There’s more, too. The claim of a Buk missile seems to be a PSYOP prepared by the CIA aided Nazi coup regime in Kiev. It used voice recordings of a separatist commander from the previous day, when they actually did shoot down an attacking SU-25 over 60 miles from the location of the Malaysian incident. The audio was chopped up crudely and used to present the rebels as “guilty,” although I’m not sure if a mistaken incident in a war zone where the Ukraine air force regularly bombs and strafes civilians would be considered any kind of “crime.” The intentional shooting down and PSYOP to assign guilt however, by the Kiev government, is a different story.

Audio Psyop:

Kiev’s evidence of militia’s responsibility for airliner crash faked – expert
http://en.itar-tass.com/russia/741521