Posts Tagged ‘BUK’

BUK-MISSILE-SHRAPNELy

UPDATE: Video was a “live feed” from last night.

Another article and video are located here:

Dutch safety board, BUK missile-maker Almaz-Antey release reports on MH17 crash LIVE UPDATES
PS

More confirmation that the Dutch investigation is rigged:

12:29 GMT

The Dutch Safety Board will study the results of two experiments presented by BUK manufacturer Almaz-Antey.”

They didn’t agree to look at the missile manufacturer’s vast amount of data until TODAY, over a year after the incident. Previous attempts to submit data to the Dutch investigation were rebuffed. The Dutch are also trying to call today’s presentation a “final” report. How can it be “final” if they never looked at the actual arms manufacturer’s data and experiments?

Some actual tests:

PPS

Buk missile systems are part of the Ukrainian arsenal (for decades), a fact omitted in almost all western news coverage. There are several models and they have serial number which could identify the source. This has not been recovered.

The BUK-M1 air defense missile system is deployed with the armed forces of Ukraine and a number of other countries.

The “BUK” Ground Force Air Defense System

When the plane was shot down the Ukrainian armed forces attacked the site of the crash and kept investigators from approaching the evidence for several months. They repeatedly shelled the crash site, not exactly cooperative. It also shows that they were present in the area the whole time.

PPPS

Dutch presentation angry at Ukraine for using airspace over the war, but pushing incompetence rather than premeditation:

csm_mh17-einschu__sse_c43fcedbcc

In what is glaring and absurd to any objective observer, the Dutch have monkey wrenched the year and a half “investigation” of the Ukrainian shoot down.

Intl investigation failed to use Russian data’

On Tuesday, the Dutch Safety Board will release its final report on the fate of the crashed Malaysian Airlines MH17 flight. Ahead of the report’s publication we take a look at the key facts, theories and false trails surrounding the investigation.

Willy Wimmer, former Vice-President of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, joins RT

bbc-censored-Ukraine-fraud-mh17

no-buk-censored-bbc

BBC deleted this report where residents dispute the Ukraine coup (Nazi) government’s version of events.

RT pulled it back from the memory hole…

This blatant BBC censorship is another highly problematic issue in and of itself.

  • Fighter Jet seen with MH17
  • No BUK missile unit witnessed where Ukrainian intelligence (sic) claims
  • No trace of missile fired
  • Frudulent video shows missile launcher convoy in town controlled by Ukraine military, not rebels

BBC now completely discredited for hiding this information from the world.

BBC-Lies-hour (1)

Alexander Khodakovsky

Alexander Khodakovsky in Donetsk. ‘That Buk I know about … They probably sent it back in order to remove proof of its presence,’ he said. Photograph: Maxim Zmeyev/Reuters

The Guardian has interviewed a confused “commander” in the east who has no direct knowledge whatsoever of what went on, and tries to turn it into an admission of guilt.

“That Buk I know about. I heard about it. I think they sent it back. Because I found out about it at exactly the moment that I found out that this tragedy had taken place. They probably sent it back in order to remove proof of its presence,” Khodakovsky told Reuters.

He heard the same news story put out by the Ukrainian government, the fraudulent audio “intercept” that was sent everywhere. He’s relaying the news story without any first hand knowledge that a rebel-controlled BUK ever existed, or was “sent back,” to Russia which was the Kiev government fraud, exposed by its sloppy video evidence.

So this interview subject, Alexander Khodakovsky, a “commander” has no first hand knowledge that any BUK system even existed prior to the Malaysian incident. Odd?  No?

Nor any knowledge that it was ever sent “back” anywhere. He’s clearly speculating. He has no knowledge that it ever existed at all, and is only relaying stories he’s heard, though where he heard them from is of no concern to the Guardian.

The Guardian then goes one better–

” This week the Guardian also spoke to witnesses who said they saw a missile-launching system that looked like a Buk drive through Torez, near the crash site, last Thursday, a few hours before the plane was downed.”

Really?  No Names. Nothing to corroborate this story. No idea of the sympathies of those who are allegedly making these claims, but since it fits in with the ‘blame Russia’ bias of the rag, let’s throw that in too.

This is the standard of evidence for deciding matters of war and peace?

PS: The Spy Satellite that Didn’t Bark

There’s an easy rebuttal to the Guardian’s Torez claims from unnamed so-called witnesses: the spy satellite photos.  Where are they? Why is the US hiding them?

If the US had pictures of these large lumbering vehicles, as claimed, they would be on the front page of every newspaper in the west. The propaganda is shown by what they won’t show as well as what they do claim.

 

MH 17 flight paths_0

 

The preponderance of evidence to date shows that the Kiev Nazi regime ordered the Malaysian plane to head north over the hot war zone so that it could shoot down the plane, sacrifice the passengers and crew, and then blame their opponents for the atrocity.

The Kiev regime is hiding the air traffic control recordings. They have been caught lying on multiple occasions and fabricating false flag terrorism on other occasions. The White House has aided and abetted these fascist murderers in Kiev, and there is all the reason to believe that the CIA is involved with these actions in order to demonize Putin and Russia. They have been demonizing Russia for about a century, if you haven’t noticed. This is a continuum, an ongoing policy of imperial aggression against rivals like Russia and China. Dead civilians are a quick and easy way to sell the policies they wish to enact.

Malaysian Airlines MH17 Was Ordered to Fly over the East Ukraine Warzone

 

 

1405639233203.cached

 

This lie made it all the way into official Washington propaganda. But what are we actually looking at?

“It is beyond incredibly sloppy for Ukraine to release such a video with a clear billboard of something in Ukraine-held territory, purportedly showing a Buk missile launcher headed back to Russia.”

Video of Rebel Buk Launchers Headed Back to Russia? No – Images From Ukraine-Held Territory Since May

On Friday, the Daily Mail, one of the major UK tabloids carried photos and video of what was alleged to be a rebel “Buk” launcher heading back to Russia.  The article carried a claim from some Ukrainian source that the launcher was missing several missiles after having shot them at the Malaysian 777.

…The video referenced by the New York Times was, in fact, posted on the Facebook account of the Ukrainian Interior Minister. The allegation was that the launcher was crossing the border with Russia.

However, going by the billboard and other features of the scenery, Russian bloggers and news sources claim to have identified the road in the video as having been taken in or near the town of Krasnoarmeisk (“Krasnoarmiysk” in Ukrainian), which has been under Kiev’s control since May.

 

So it appears that the real life Nazis are as stupid and incompetent as the TV sitcom variety. They just provided proof that the launcher most likely responsible for shooting down the airliner is one of their own, in a town controlled by Ukraine military.

 

Ukraine-Buk-Missile-Launcher

 

 Photos that Kiev Forces Deployed BUK Missiles In East Ukraine
  • RUSSIA HAS IMAGES OF UKRAINE DEPLOYING BUK ROCKETS IN EAST: IFX
  • RUSSIA: UKRAINE MOVED BUK NEAR REBELS IN DONETSK JULY 17: IFX
  • RUSSIA DETECTED UKRAINIAN FIGHTER JET PICK UP SPEED TOWARD MH17

Ukraine-Military-Plane-Radar

 

 

 

More:

Russian Audio Analysis: Ukraine Intercepts a Fraud!