Posts Tagged ‘bush’

AFGHAN-WAR-01

“What are we trying to do here? We didn’t have the foggiest notion.”
-US General

 

The Banality of Imperial War Criminals

Joe Giambrone

FREE ONLINE

posterMaxi-10-9-e1527794549420

“Not only will America go to your country and kill all your people, but what’s worse I think is they’ll come back twenty years later and make a movie about how killing your people made their soldiers feel sad.”
–Frankie Boyle

This film may have been the one that inspired Frankie’s rant.

As the next team of warmongers gears up to lie the world into an illegal assault on Iran, this film takes on added significance. It’s angering on so many levels from the monsters in suits, to the reign of terror, to the Nazi-level war crimes, to the willful blindness of both participants and filmmakers.

Some Background

America’s invasion of Iraq was exactly comparable to Nazi Germany’s invasion of Poland, from a legal standpoint. No American ever had the legal right to step one foot on Iraqi soil. Iraq was a sovereign country, a principle that World War Two was fought to establish, costing upwards of 70 million lives.

America thinks it’s above the law and has led the assault on any restraints to its exercise of force, Iraq being a most glaring example.

No End In Sight says not one word about any of that. Far from it. They accept the US regime’s main argument that Saddam was a bad guy, and so somehow it was okay to invade his country. It was not.

1717-colin-powell-un-vial-020503

They knew it was not. That’s why they concocted phony “Weapons of Mass Destruction” lies to try and deceive the United Nations into granting Security Council approval for the attack–and their obvious lies failed. That made the entire war a breach of the UN Charter and the “Supreme International Crime,” Crimes Against the Peace. Every subsequent action was the direct fault of those who initiated the war, every atrocity, every evil, every consequence, every kidnapping, every maiming, every rape, every murder. These people are monsters towering well above and beyond the Saddams or Qaddafis of the world.

By their own logic, as they are immoral and gleefully evil, other nations now have a right to invade America and install a new regime. That’s not the way international law works. It’s the way imperial war propaganda works, however.

Spinning the Indefensible

Now onto the fiasco depicted in the film. We have a cast of self-styled do-gooders participating in a major war crime, desiring to stabilize the country and rebuild it (after their own military destroyed it). They are prevented from doing so by a series of seemingly incomprehensible bad decisions from Rumsfeld, Cheney, Paul Bremer and their gaggle of incompetent lackeys.

1. Upon the fall of Saddam, no law is enforced, allowing complete chaos and looting all over the country.

2. The Iraqi army is disbanded leaving hundreds of thousands of armed, trained men, with no income and nothing to do.

3. The Americans refuse to even speak with Iraqis as their stormtroopers raid and kill and torture their family members.

I’m of the mind that all of this was intentional, and that the PLAN A was never to win the peace in Iraq. Wars are so difficult to launch, they wanted Iraq to descend into region-wide chaos engulfing Syria (done) and Iran (still very much on the agenda).

General Wesley Clark divulged the Bush Junta’s plans, which were to attack “seven nations in five years,” barely a week after they allowed the 9/11 attacks to succeed. That’s another story, and America has yet to recover a modicum of self-respect and demand justice.

What No End in Sight captured was a small part of this large imperial agenda for a “new American Century” of aggression and the seizing of vital resources, particularly oil and gas.

While the film talks about Paul Bremer’s presumed incompetence, it fails to mention his 100 Orders slicing up Iraq’s economy like Darth Vader seizing a new star system. Of course, pillaging other countries is glaringly illegal, but we’ve already established the blinders worn by the filmmakers.

These types of key omissions are why I don’t ever trust US documentarians when it comes to foreign policy. They revert to the juvenile “mistakes were made” mindset. They’re not “mistakes” when you do them on purpose: those are crimes, capital crimes punishable by death. They violate every Treaty the country has signed–and which the US helped create in the first place–including the Geneva Conventions and the UN Charter.

The most evil criminals wear suits and they get away with it. One of the reasons they get away with it is because of biased journalism that spins away their crimes so that the public is dissuaded from thinking of US rulers as criminals on par with the worst war criminals one can name. In the end it’s an assault on reality as well as morality.

 

img_hwbush_cia_lg-300x1622.jpg

The Tangled Web Of U.S.-Saudi Ties (2004)

The relationship peaked under the presidency of George H.W. Bush. This is both due to personal and financial ties, but moreover because the Saudi royal family supported (was even grateful) for the first Iraqi war, when the United States ousted Iraqi troops from Kuwait.

Both then-president Bush and the current president have had personal and deep financial ties with the Saudi royal family. Author and journalist Craig Unger documents $1.4 billion that has “made its way” from the Saudi royal family to “entities tied” to the Bush family, according to Unger’s controversial book “House of Bush, House of Saud.”

 

MAIN-Kim-Jong-Un-missiles.jpg

link

1437.jpg

 

A toast for Guccifer, who faces a lengthy prison term for exposing these criminal syndicates called “Democrats” and “Republicans.”

Nancy Pelosi’s files, with lots of bribe money tabulated…

DCCC DOCS FROM PELOSI’S PC

 

Here’s Nancy Pelosi’s response to Black Lives Matter. After acknowledging their concerns:

“Don’t offer support for concrete policy positions”

That’s the Democratic Party today in a nutshell. You are wasting your breath. They say so themselves.

In a laughable take on ISIS, they claim it’s all Bush and Zarqawi (who was supposedly killed in 2006, a full decade ago!). It’s the same blame Bush for everything mantra you hear all over the Democrat-friendly web. The Zarqawi charade is icing on the cake. Killed five years before a stone was thrown in Syria, but it’s all him. Trust her.

 

doj_bails_out_torture_memo_authors_yoo_bybee

Alleged War Criminals Jay Bybee & John Yoo

 

Human Rights Watch Reports That US Government Tortured Children — Paul Craig Roberts

 

Prince_Bandar_911

 

SF Gate:

Heads-Up To Ashcroft Proves Threat Was Known Before 9/11

On July 26, 2001, cbsnews.com reported that John Ashcroft had stopped flying on commercial airlines.

Ashcroft used to fly commercial, just as Janet Reno did. So why, two months before Sept. 11, did he start taking chartered government planes?

CBS News correspondent Jim Stewart asked the Justice Department.

Because of a “threat assessment” by the FBI, he was told. But “neither the FBI nor the Justice Department … would identify what the threat was, when it was detected or who made it,” CBS News reported.

The FBI did advise Ashcroft to stay off commercial aircraft. The rest of us just had to take our chances.

 

A two-fer!

Well look at this timing…

“The 27th G8 summit was held in Genoa, Italy, on July 21–22, 2001...”

LA Times:

Italy Tells of Threat at Genoa Summit

In an interview published Sept. 21 in the French newspaper Le Figaro, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak said his government provided information to the United States about possible attacks on the Genoa summit by Saudi-born terrorist Osama bin Laden. “There was a question of an airplane stuffed with explosives. As a result, precautions were taken.”

 

The threats against Bush at Genoa were not made public until AFTER 9/11. Just as dozens, or perhaps hundreds, of associated warnings were also kept hidden.

To reiterate:

  1. They knew.
  2. They did absolutely nothing to round up known Al Qaeda terrorists residing in the United States.
  3. They covered up everything.
  4. They protected Saudi sponsors of the hijackers.

Are we seeing a problem yet?

Ask Noam Chomsky for me. He doesn’t return my emails.

Real History