“ALL THE EXCITEMENT OF COMIC BOOKS WITH A LOT MORE SUBSTANCE”
-Tome Tender
“DOES NOT DISAPPOINT!”
-Author Brittany Seguin
Find us on Facebook too.
“IT’S THE HUNGER GAMES MEETS THE WALKING DEAD!”
-Anime Reporter
“THIS BOOK WAS AMAZING!”
-Reading My Reality
Note the weasel wording, the limited hangouts. Nowhere does he call it a crime, a felony, a war crime. He’s an apologist. He wants to reveal it, as that’s his job, but justice and holding people accountable for numerous crimes never enters the discussion.
The words “crime” and “felony” never appear in Vice’s reporting, an organization that isn’t wholly trustworthy, with a long record of government ties and stenography.
Zero evidence has established that Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide. Zero. The preponderance suggests murder and cover-up. Most news media have been in lockstep repeating the official claims, however, (including DemocracyNow!) and that in itself is telling. Independent thought will not be tolerated.
The public can’t differentiate between a claim and a fact, and this has been the Achilles heel in our society for a long time. It’s the cornerstone of most propaganda. It is the Big Lie principle: If you repeat a lie enough times, people believe it.
“Jeffrey Epstein was confident he could fight the child sex trafficking charges against him and was in “great spirits” just hours before his jailhouse death on Saturday morning — even telling one of his lawyers, “I’ll see you Sunday,” The Post has learned.” –Jeffrey Epstein’s last words to lawyer before his jailhouse death
https://nypost.com/2019/08/14/jeffrey-epsteins-last-words-to-lawyer-before-his-jailhouse-death/
Of course, he was confident. He was a billionaire, with dirt on multiple US presidents, connected to intelligence, who had already beat the system on a previous occasion.
The only reason anyone associates him with “suicide” was because he was found beaten up in his cell several weeks ago and refused to name his attacker for fear of being murdered in his sleep. Thus an automatic “suicide watch” is enacted. That’s all the simplistic public needs to accept whatever authorities claim next.
“Shrieking heard from Jeffrey Epstein’s jail cell the morning he died” says CBS. His neck was broken, the guards were MIA and caught fabricating a story, et cetera. It couldn’t be more glaring. But, half the population is still programmed to accept what authority figures claim and to shun independent thought.
Worse still, they make it a partisan smokescreen—if Trump says something about it, then they must knee-jerk claim the opposite, with just as little evidence, and without any analysis at all. It’s a circus of the absurd, and the clowns keep multiplying.
For several years, fake, foundation-funded “progressive” media (propaganda) have been trying to shame people into shutting up about the unsolved murder of Seth Rich. Rich worked at the DNC, where those Hillary Clinton emails originated.
You should know that Rich’s name first surfaced when Julian Assange personally mentioned him in interviews, implying that he was connected to the release of sensitive documents from the DNC. No one has ever disproven this. Period.
Judge Amos Mazzant of U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruled Wednesday that the $57 million suit brought by Ed Butowsky makes plausible claims that the network may be liable for defamation for a series of online stories about Butowsky’s role in publicizing assertions that the murdered DNC staffer, Seth Rich, may have been involved in leaking Democratic emails.
NPR argued that many of the claims in its reports, like assertions that Fox’s reporting on the Rich murder was “baseless” and “fake news,” amounted to opinion and not the kind of factual claims that can be the basis for a libel suit.
But Mazzant disagreed.
“The statements made by Folkenflik were made as verifiable statements of fact,” the judge wrote. “The statements at issue were not merely expressing a subjective view. Looking at the context of the verifiable facts, nothing shows the statements expressed Folkenflik’s opinion or merely offer Folkenflik’s personal perspective on disputed facts.”
Article summarizes events:
Something quite important occurred to me. My comment:
Craig Murray, who delivered the documents, said that there was an intermediary, someone else involved in the transfer. What if that intermediary was Rich’s BROTHER?
The family could be trying to protect the brother from a similar fate by claiming Seth had nothing to do with political motivations for his killing. That would explain much. If you’re going to trust someone in a crime of this magnitude, you probably only trust family.
And, if any readers here are brainwashed by corporate spin, we also have more reasons for suspicion of assassination and conspiracy right from Donna Brazile, the head of the DNC!
Rich appears elsewhere in Brazile’s book, as the Post reported earlier in the weekend. She wrote that Rich’s murder haunted her and that she’d installed surveillance cameras at her home and would keep the blinds in her office window closed so she could not be seen by snipers, according to the Post.
Brazile talked about Rich on ABC News’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos on Sunday. She told the host about her critics: “They don’t know what it was like to be over the DNC during this hacking. They don’t know what it’s like to bury a child. I did: Seth Rich.”
Newsweek is reporting on US covert operations to overthrow sovereign states…
America is in blatant breach of the UN Charter
Article 2
The Organization and its Members, in pursuit of the Purposes stated in Article 1, shall act in accordance with the following Principles.
The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members.
All Members, in order to ensure to all of them the rights and benefits resulting from membership, shall fulfill in good faith the obligations assumed by them in accordance with the present Charter.
All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered.
All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.
All Members shall give the United Nations every assistance in any action it takes in accordance with the present Charter, and shall refrain from giving assistance to any state against which the United Nations is taking preventive or enforcement action.
The UN Charter is the direct result of World War Two, where the crime of attacking other countries was punished with the death penalty. Kerry and the US coalition flagrantly violate international law in Syria by arming and training and funding multiple armies of terrorists, while Russia complies with the law and was invited in by the elected government there.
There would be no war there without these international crimes, Crimes Against the Peace.
