Posts Tagged ‘data’

gr1

download

Look carefully at the data.

 

This is from the world-famous British medical journal, The Lancet:

Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China

 

The first patient had no connection to the wild animal market that the media is selling as the source of the virus. This was 9 days before one patient showed up who did have a connection to the market. Curious?

Claims that Wuhan is host to China’s main Level-4 virus laboratory are true.

Kēxuéyuàn Wǔhàn Bìngdú Yánjiūsuǒ) is a research institute on virology administered by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). Located in Jiangxia DistrictWuhanHubei, it opened mainland China’s first biosafety level 4 (BSL–4) laboratory in 2015.”

Wuhan Institute of Virology

 

There is an information clampdown on this issue. Some have gone batshit crazy howling “Conspiracy Theory” at the tops of their lungs while disproving nothing.

Professor Francis Boyle is a genuine bio-warfare expert who wrote the 1989 law banning this research. He is now being actively censored and demonized for talking about these issues and suggesting the virus leaked from the laboratory after being enhanced to be a more effective biological weapon.

This is vital information. The world’s media should be investigating, not slandering experts.

Dr. Francis Boyle creator of US BioWeapons Act says Coronavirus is biological warfare weapon

 

Professor Boyle is referring to a study titled “Coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade,”
“Professor Boyle added: “Let me just conclude, the critical part here where it says: ‘And may provide a gain of function to the 2019 nCoV for efficient spreading in the human population compared to other beta coronaviruses.’”

Coronavirus shock claim: ‘Smoking gun of Chinese lab leak’ exposed by bioweapons expert

 

PS
The seafood/wild animal market is 277 meters from the virus laboratory.

The possible origins of 2019-nCoV coronavirus

Botao Xiao1,2* and Lei Xiao3
1 Joint International Research Laboratory of Synthetic Biology and Medicine, School
of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology,
Guangzhou 510006, China

China reported the virus to World Health Organization on December 31, but the first patient was known on December 1st, a 30-day delay! Why?

Report of a major cover-up and attempted destruction of all samples, which appears to have failed as it was beyond containment.

Chinese scientists destroyed proof of virus in December

 

 

SOUTH CAROLINA 2020 DEMOCRATIC PARTY PRIMARY Exit Poll Versus Reported Vote Count

the-nsa-has-always-been-spying-on-you

willliam-binney

“Mueller Report based on fabricated evidence”

In other words, it looked like the CIA did this, and that it was a matter of the CIA making it look like the Russians were doing the hack. So, when you look at that and also look at the DNC emails that were published by Wikileaks that have this phat file format in them, all 35,813 of these emails have rounded off times to the nearest even second.

That’s a phat file format property; that argues that those files were, in fact, downloaded to a thumb drive or CD-rom and physically transported before Wikileaks posted them. Which again argues that it wasn’t a hack.

FaceBookAd-757286-e1314022383319.jpg

Facebook reportedly gave tech giants access to users’ private messages

Facebook gave Netflix and Spotify the ability to read users’ private messages. They allowed Microsoft’s search engine Bing to see the names of Facebook users’ friends without permission, and they let Amazon find users’ names and contact information through their friends on the platform, according to the report.

Facebook gave access to user data to about 150 companies in all, including banks, tech companies, retailers and media organization, the Times reported.

facebook-privacy_0

 

Documents Show Facebook Has Never Deserved Your Trust

Facebook Messenger’s sneaky logging of Android users’ phone call and text message histories. When a user discovered what Messenger was doing this past spring, it caused public outrage right on the heels of the Cambridge Analytica news. Facebook responded with a “fact check” press release insisting that Messenger had never collected such data without clear user permission.

6ueGyKXF.jpg

 

 

DOJ demands Facebook information from ‘anti-administration activists’