Posts Tagged ‘deception’

WikiLeaks-Assange-Russia-NOT-Source - Copy

 

Assange is caught up in these games. The government claims “Guccifer 2” was:

  1. A Russian intelligence person
  2. The supplier of the Clinton emails

Both these claims look like nonsense. Guccifer 2 was a fraud created to frame Assange. It’s long and it’s tiresome.

Mueller’s Own Report Undercuts Its Core Russia-Meddling Claims

 

 

More important, as Raffi Khatchadourian has reported for The New Yorker, the documents Guccifer 2.0 released directly were nowhere near the quality of the material published by WikiLeaks. For example, on June 18, Guccifer 2.0 released documents that it claimed were from the DNC, “but which were almost surely not,” Khatchadourian notes. Neither was the material Guccifer 2.0 teased as a “dossier on Hillary Clinton from DNC.” The material Guccifer 2.0 initially promoted in June also contained easily discoverable Russian metadata. The computer that created it was configured for the Russian language, and the username was “Felix Dzerzhinsky,” the Bolshevik-era founder of the first Soviet secret police.

WikiLeaks only made contact with Guccifer 2.0 after the latter publicly invited journalists “to send me their questions via Twitter Direct Messages.” And, more problematic given the central role the report assigned to Guccifer 2.0, there is no direct evidence that WikiLeaks actually released anything that Guccifer 2.0 provided. In a 2017 interview, Assange said he “didn’t publish” any material from that source because much of it had been published elsewhere and because “we didn’t have the resources to independently verify.”

..

Assange also made public offers to testify before Congress. The Mueller report makes no mention of these overtures, though it does cite and dismiss “media reports” that “Assange told a U.S. congressman that the DNC hack was an ‘inside job,’ and purported to have ‘physical proof’ that Russians did not give materials to Assange.”

Mueller does not explain why he included Assange’s comments as reported by media outlets in his report but decided not to speak with Assange directly, or ask to see his “physical proof,” during a two-year investigation.

berkeley-igs-omits-Tulsi-Gabbard

Only anti-war candidate Representative Tulsi Gabbard is omitted from this poll, a poll run by a publicly financed major university in California!

I’m not having it.

Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2019 1:29 PM
To: igs@berkeley.edu; mdicamillo@berkeley.edu; deanofstudents@berkeley.edu; chesse@berkeley.edu; auffhammer@berkeley.edu; lspd_appt@berkeley.edu; Randi.shussett@berkeley.edu; svogel@socrates.berkeley.edu; publicaffairs@calstate.edu; webservices@calstate.edu; tips@sacbee.com; tbyrne@sfchronicle.com; tips@latimes.com

Subject: Your June 13 Poll is FAKE NEWS, deliberately omits Congresswoman Gabbard from choices

UC Berkeley (a publicly funded university):

This is unacceptable and damages the integrity and reputation of your organization. I will be contacting others and writing about this absurdity of censoring out a sitting US Congresswoman with a clear suggestion to remove and fire whomever is responsible for rigging Berkeley’s political polls. You no longer can be trusted. What’s that worth to you?

https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7wx193w5

berkeley-igs-omits-Tulsi-Gabbard.png

Fake polls that deliberately omit choices from respondents produce fake news: biased, nonsense results.

I am not interested in excuses, only in action to remedy the problems clearly evident in your department.

Joe Giambrone
CSU Graduate

 

trump-russian-pee-tape-threat-level-raised-to-code-yellow

 

In the wake of Trump saying he’d like foreign dirt on opponents (again), the Democratic brainwashed Tweeter Brigade is out vomiting all over the net.

But they never had a problem with a UK SPY working for their candidate. A spy. From the UK, and most certainly not an American. This was a foreigner meddling in the election. They spin it away with the “special” status of Britain, them being friends and such, what hypocritical nonsense.

But even when that UK spy was exposed for using RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT SOURCES, they still have a remarkable capacity for not seeing a problem there. The hypocrisy meter is broken beyond repair.

Clinton & DNC lied and covered this up for about a year during election season:

Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier

How good were these sources? Consider what Steele would write in the memos he filed with Simpson: Source A—to use the careful nomenclature of his dossier—was “a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure.” Source B was “a former top level intelligence officer still active in the Kremlin.”

HOW EX-SPY CHRISTOPHER STEELE COMPILED HIS EXPLOSIVE TRUMP-RUSSIA DOSSIER

 

So, good luck talking facts and logic to Clintonites.

140924-isis-islamic-state-mn-1525_f8a0c1e479a54a71c5664ba320232239.nbcnews-fp-1240-520

 

Specific lies in the Al Qaeda/White Helmets propaganda film are debunked.

 

See:

 

hqdefault.jpg

 

PS

Dore doing great investigative journalism on media corruption, the frauds at NY Times and Politico.

#firemaddow

 

 

Maddow is a despicable shill no one should take seriously about any topic. These libels should be actionable, and Wikileaks should sue MSNBC immediately.

Errors in Rachel Maddow’s reporting on Julian Assange

maxresdefault (3).jpg

 

Rolling Stone exposes systematic lying against candidates Tulsi Gabbard and Bernie Sanders. I don’t always agree with Matt Taibbi, but he has some independence.