Posts Tagged ‘DNC’

trump-russian-pee-tape-threat-level-raised-to-code-yellow

 

In the wake of Trump saying he’d like foreign dirt on opponents (again), the Democratic brainwashed Tweeter Brigade is out vomiting all over the net.

But they never had a problem with a UK SPY working for their candidate. A spy. From the UK, and most certainly not an American. This was a foreigner meddling in the election. They spin it away with the “special” status of Britain, them being friends and such, what hypocritical nonsense.

But even when that UK spy was exposed for using RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT SOURCES, they still have a remarkable capacity for not seeing a problem there. The hypocrisy meter is broken beyond repair.

Clinton & DNC lied and covered this up for about a year during election season:

Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier

How good were these sources? Consider what Steele would write in the memos he filed with Simpson: Source A—to use the careful nomenclature of his dossier—was “a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure.” Source B was “a former top level intelligence officer still active in the Kremlin.”

HOW EX-SPY CHRISTOPHER STEELE COMPILED HIS EXPLOSIVE TRUMP-RUSSIA DOSSIER

 

So, good luck talking facts and logic to Clintonites.

who-killed-seth-rich

 

Article summarizes events:

Why Didn’t Mueller Investigate Seth Rich?
BUT–

Something quite important occurred to me. My comment:

Craig Murray, who delivered the documents, said that there was an intermediary, someone else involved in the transfer. What if that intermediary was Rich’s BROTHER?

The family could be trying to protect the brother from a similar fate by claiming Seth had nothing to do with political motivations for his killing. That would explain much. If you’re going to trust someone in a crime of this magnitude, you probably only trust family.

 

And, if any readers here are brainwashed by corporate spin, we also have more reasons for suspicion of assassination and conspiracy right from Donna Brazile, the head of the DNC!

Rich appears elsewhere in Brazile’s book, as the Post reported earlier in the weekend. She wrote that Rich’s murder haunted her and that she’d installed surveillance cameras at her home and would keep the blinds in her office window closed so she could not be seen by snipers, according to the Post.

Brazile talked about Rich on ABC News’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos on Sunday. She told the host about her critics: “They don’t know what it was like to be over the DNC during this hacking. They don’t know what it’s like to bury a child. I did: Seth Rich.”

SNIPERS!!!

BIDEN-2020-Spirit-Animal copy

tulsi-mag-cover copy

 

 

“What’s real is war, and the costs of war.”

Craig-Murray-British-Ambassador-whistleblower-002.jpg

 

Dec. 2016 Daily Mail piece where Craig Murray admitted to being a courier for leaked DNC emails. This is probably true, and it probably points to SETH RICH as being the source, as Assange hinted. Seth Rich was soon murdered in a Washington DC street in a “robbery” where nothing was actually stolen.

I should also say that “Russiagate” is quite a bit larger than this one email dump.

EXCLUSIVE: Ex-British ambassador who is now a WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Clinton emails – they were handed over to him at a D.C. park by an intermediary for ‘disgusted’ Democratic whistleblowers
  • Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and associate of Julian Assange, told the Dailymail.com  he flew to Washington, D.C. for emails

  • He claims he had a clandestine hand-off in a wooded area near American University with one of the email sources 

  • The leakers’ motivation was ‘disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the  ’tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders’

  • Murray says: ‘The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks’

  • ‘Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that,’ Murray insists

  • Murray is a controversial figure who was relieved of his post as British ambassador amid allegations of misconduct but is close to Wikileaks

D5WlnshXoAAlDX7.jpg

 

Democracy is under attack by US corporations.

#FakeNews org “MSNBC” just demonstrably lied about a presidential poll.

Their boss/owner also recently threw Joe Biden a campaign party.

1000209212.jpg.0.jpg

The non-stop, self-serving gloating of people I generally agree with: Glenn Greenwald, Aaron Maté, Michael Tracey, et al. is unprofessional and distasteful. They are wallowing in Maddow and FoxNews territory now.

Russiagate is a grey area, not black and white, and I do not believe we have the full story. Just recall all the redactions. By focusing on other people’s “conspiracy theories” the self-imposed limits of these journalists are not centered on what actually happened, but merely on gamesmanship: proving somebody else’s claim wrong. That is always distracting and a dead end, perhaps a complete waste of time for all concerned.

Greenwald’s latest makes this bold claim, its headline:

“Robert Mueller Did Not Merely Reject the Trump-Russia Conspiracy Theories. He Obliterated Them.”

But, by the article’s conclusion Greenwald equivocates a bit:

One can debate whether it’s unethical for a presidential campaign to have dirt about its opponent released by a foreign government, [YES: LET’S DEBATE THAT] though anyone who wants to argue that has to reconcile that with the fact that the DNC had a contractor working with the Ukrainian government to help Hillary Clinton win by feeding them dirt on Trump and Manafort, as well as a paid operative named Christopher Steele (remember him?) working with Russian officials to get dirt on Trump.

Yeah. It’s ALL unethical. Lock them all up. How did Democratic Party crimes make Republican Party crimes suddenly legitimate? That is the slippy slope to hell.

Greenwald also makes a few sloppy assumptions. He accepts as Gospel:

1. “Russia” hacked the DNC server. Our own NSA whistleblowers determined that impossible based on the forensic evidence. Mueller continues to push this discredited claim undermining his own credibility.

2. That Robert Mueller was objective and had no interest in protecting Trump despite being a “conservative Republican,” as well as helping to cover up the 9/11 attacks.

Greenwald et al. should know full well that only cover-up artists get appointed to “investigate” the crimes of high officials in this country. It is a 100% certainty, going back at least to the Warren Commission. Also see: Iran/Contra. The full truth is seldom revealed about anything that could undermine confidence in the American system.

There may have been a Russian “hack” of John Podesta’s email account, a phishing scam, but then again I have seen zero evidence to date that “Russia” means the GOVERNMENT of Russia, with any evidence linking that government to the crime which would stand up in an actual court. That’s the problem with this trial by media: the “facts” are never established, challenged, buttressed; they just languish in a sea of half-truths and drivel. Whether any given set of Russian hackers are loyal to Vladimir Putin or to the almighty dollar is an open question.

We still swim in a swirling grey area.

We do know that the super-genius Second Son of Trump, Eric, admitted in 2014:

“We have all the funding we need out of Russia.”

Do you?

Donald Trump Jr. himself famously said in 2008 that “Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets. We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia.”

Would this Russian money appear on Trump’s secret tax returns? Did Robert Mueller ever get a look at those returns? Did he ever follow up on this money trail at all?

Just yesterday, in Greenwald’s own publication, I read quite a bit about Trump’s campaign manager, Paul Manafort, and his own set of Russian connections.

During the campaign, Manafort stayed in touch with these contacts through Konstantin Kilimnik, a longtime employee who previously ran Manafort’s office in Kiev. The FBI assessed that Kilimnik has ties to Russian intelligence, the report says.

Manafort also met with Kilmnik in the United States twice during the campaign and gave him campaign-related information. [Why?] And Kilmnnik passed on a message from Yanukovych, who was in exile in Russia, about a peace plan that would have allowed Russia to control eastern Ukraine.

After Trump won the election, Kilimnik wrote to Manafort that the plan would need U.S. support and that it could use a “very minor wink” from Trump.

That’s a quid pro quo.

If that doesn’t constitute some greyness, Glenn, then I don’t know what to tell you. Things are not so cut and dry as some would like to pretend.