Posts Tagged ‘editors’

58282

 

 

Banned in America

 

The right to freedom of speech only protects people against adverse actions by the government:  It does not insulate them from retaliation in the private economic sector.  Therefore, freedom of speech is usually the purview of the rich, whose resources allow them to survive such retaliation.

The right to freedom of the press doesn’t necessarily give writers access to the press, and, even when it does, these writers incessantly have to run through a gauntlet of “editors,” who ultimately decide if certain works are “worthy” of publication, and, if so, in what form.

 

37.si

I’m starting to get worried that the big fix is in.

A ray of sunshine, Veterans Affairs Journal covered the Daniel Hopsicker revelations about CIA/Graham E. Fuller and Tsarnaev brothers’ uncle Ruslan Tsarni.

 

Veterans_Today_Logo

 

Although it is a proven, indisputable fact that the boys’ uncle was married to the daughter of a top CIA official who is a specialist in Islamic extremism and was former CIA station chief in Kabul Afghanistan, this fact cannot be published in any corporate news source — or at least it hasn’t to date.  How is it that a little movie blog can write and post for days about this explosive evidence, yet the New York Times can’t find it relevant to the world?

I’m disheartened though because RT / Russia Today has also failed to report this case.  I have personally, and repeatedly notified RT of the existence of this information, and yet have seen nothing.  Hopsicker’s initial finding is dated April 26.  It’s the 30th.

?

russiatoday

I am truly disturbed this time because even RT and Abby Martin are silenced on this issue so far. This is indicative of something Sibel Edmonds said the other day, and that is that Russia may be making a deal with Washington behind the scenes.

The hypothetical deal is as follows. Washington throws their Chechen terrorists to the wolves: the Russian security services. In exchange Russia abandons Assad in Syria, allowing NATO to launch major military actions and take Syria.

That leaves Sibel Edmonds and a handful of brave whisleblowers and fringe investigators (like me!!!) as the only news sources on the CIA / Boston Marathon bombing connections.  I’m afraid not enough people view these sources to make a substantial dent and get the actual truth out to the masses.  It’s the 9/11 cover up all over again.

But this time the end game is to ramp up the unaccountable, secretive police state, as we witnessed the show of force in Boston when literally thousands of heavily armed troops and armored personnel carriers flooded the streets and searched homes without warrants.  Look for more of that.

And to get more of that, nothing works better than more incidents to sell it with to the public.  This is an extremely dangerous time, and with the complete abandonment by the news media, we are in a state of fascist top-down control.  Now, already.

If the crimes and abuses of the government cannot be challenged, it is by default a tyranny, a despotic regime.

Watch this news carefully.  It is undeniable that Graham Fuller’s daughter married Ruslan, the uncle of the two ALLEGED bombers.  Even Graham Fuller has admitted as much.  The rest of the story is what the CIA has been doing in Chechnya since 1995, when Ruslan Tsarnaev first set up the “Congress of Chechen International Organizations” from Graham Fuller’s home.

There is no clearer or more desperate example of media censorship today than this news story.

 

“Conspiracy Theory”: Foundations of a Weaponized Term
Subtle and Deceptive Tactics to Discredit Truth in Media and Research
Prof. James F. Tracy

The editorial “gatekeepers” of America operate as if directed by our own Central Intelligence Agency. The CIA put forth their propaganda strategy in the wake of public outrage over the murder of president John F. Kennedy and the subsequent cover-up and fabrications of the (bi-partisan) Warren Commission.

The similarly bi-partisan 9/11 Commission was also a controlled, censored, rigged exercise in obfuscation whose own co-chairman Lee Hamilton admitted on Canadian television, that the commission was “set up to fail.” And fail they did, but that does not prompt a real independent investigation of the 9/11 attacks, the role of “foreign governments” (Senator Bob Graham), or the role of the CIA itself, who helped to hide the “San Diego cell” hijackers from domestic law enforcement for 16 months prior to the attacks.

Here is how the CIA directs editors to respond to the “conspiracy theories” it found problematic, vis a vis JFK:

CIA Document #1035-960
RE: Concerning Criticism of the Warren Report

“Presumably as a result of the increasing challenge to the Warren Commission’s report, a public opinion poll recently indicated that 46% of the American public did not think that Oswald acted alone, while more than half of those polled thought that the Commission had left some questions unresolved.”

“This trend of opinion is a matter of concern to the U.S. government, including our organization.”

“Just because of the standing of the Commissioners, efforts to impugn their rectitude and wisdom tend to cast doubt on the whole leadership of American society.”

“Conspiracy theories have frequently thrown suspicion on our organization [CIA], for example by falsely alleging that Lee Harvey Oswald worked for us.”

“To discuss the publicity problem with [?] and friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors), pointing out that the Warren Commission made as thorough an investigation as humanly possible, that the charges of the critics are without serious foundation, and that further speculative discussion only plays into the hands of the opposition. Point out also that parts of the conspiracy talk appear to be deliberately generated by Communist propagandists.”

“b. To employ propaganda assets to [negate] and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose.

So, there you have it, the CIA domestic propaganda playbook.

Operation Mockingbird is relevant here.

THE CIA AND THE MEDIA
Carl Bernstein, Rolling Stone, Oct. 20 1977

One last point on the JFK matter–

That memo contains a whopper of a lie. See if you catch it:

“e. Oswald would not have been any sensible person’s choice for a co-conspirator. He was a “loner,” mixed up, of questionable reliability and an unknown quantity to any professional intelligence service.”

An unknown quantity?

The man who defected to the Soviet Union, married a Russian girl, and was allowed to emigrate back to the United States without issue?

Unknown to intelligence?

Can they seriously type that with a straight face?

“I’m just a patsy.” -Lee Harvey Oswald in custody


  
Jim Garrison’s investigation and subsequent trial, which is the basis of the Oliver Stone film JFK, showed that Oswald was working for FBI and investigating the CIA’s Cuban terrorists in Louisiana. This is more plausible than the claim of document 1035-960, that Oswald was an “unknown quantity to any professional intelligence service.” That claim doesn’t pass the laugh test.

JFK01