PEN America: Just another fraud NGO, #Hypocrites

The PEN America mission statement:

“With mounting threats to a free press and other cornerstones of our democracy, breakdowns in civil discourse, and the marginalization of important voices, PEN America has a vital role to play in defending free expression…”

So they’re attacking the world’s most important independent journalist who has been snatched and imprisoned and now is threatened with a number of charges by the Trump junta.

PEN’s only response is to promote bogus claims from CNN that are challenged for their groundless speculation and mischaracterizing of events.

DO NOT DONATE TO THIS MALIGNANT FRAUD OF AN ORGANIZATION.

 

Pelosi Enables Trump at Border – Fraud Exposed

 

Pelosi Sides With Trump-Attacks AOC & Screws Immigrants

Russiagate Still Falling Apart

 

Assange is caught up in these games. The government claims “Guccifer 2” was:

1. A Russian intelligence person
2. The supplier of the Clinton emails

Both these claims look like nonsense. Guccifer 2 was a fraud created to frame Assange. It’s long and it’s tiresome.

Mueller’s Own Report Undercuts Its Core Russia-Meddling Claims

 

 

More important, as Raffi Khatchadourian has reported for The New Yorker, the documents Guccifer 2.0 released directly were nowhere near the quality of the material published by WikiLeaks. For example, on June 18, Guccifer 2.0 released documents that it claimed were from the DNC, “but which were almost surely not,” Khatchadourian notes. Neither was the material Guccifer 2.0 teased as a “dossier on Hillary Clinton from DNC.” The material Guccifer 2.0 initially promoted in June also contained easily discoverable Russian metadata. The computer that created it was configured for the Russian language, and the username was “Felix Dzerzhinsky,” the Bolshevik-era founder of the first Soviet secret police.

WikiLeaks only made contact with Guccifer 2.0 after the latter publicly invited journalists “to send me their questions via Twitter Direct Messages.” And, more problematic given the central role the report assigned to Guccifer 2.0, there is no direct evidence that WikiLeaks actually released anything that Guccifer 2.0 provided. In a 2017 interview, Assange said he “didn’t publish” any material from that source because much of it had been published elsewhere and because “we didn’t have the resources to independently verify.”

..

Assange also made public offers to testify before Congress. The Mueller report makes no mention of these overtures, though it does cite and dismiss “media reports” that “Assange told a U.S. congressman that the DNC hack was an ‘inside job,’ and purported to have ‘physical proof’ that Russians did not give materials to Assange.”

Mueller does not explain why he included Assange’s comments as reported by media outlets in his report but decided not to speak with Assange directly, or ask to see his “physical proof,” during a two-year investigation.

Consortium: Why Didn’t Mueller Investigate Seth Rich?

 

Article summarizes events:

Why Didn’t Mueller Investigate Seth Rich?

BUT–

Something quite important occurred to me. My comment:

Craig Murray, who delivered the documents, said that there was an intermediary, someone else involved in the transfer. What if that intermediary was Rich’s BROTHER?

The family could be trying to protect the brother from a similar fate by claiming Seth had nothing to do with political motivations for his killing. That would explain much. If you’re going to trust someone in a crime of this magnitude, you probably only trust family.

 

And, if any readers here are brainwashed by corporate spin, we also have more reasons for suspicion of assassination and conspiracy right from Donna Brazile, the head of the DNC!

Rich appears elsewhere in Brazile’s book, as the Post reported earlier in the weekend. She wrote that Rich’s murder haunted her and that she’d installed surveillance cameras at her home and would keep the blinds in her office window closed so she could not be seen by snipers, according to the Post.

Brazile talked about Rich on ABC News’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos on Sunday. She told the host about her critics: “They don’t know what it was like to be over the DNC during this hacking. They don’t know what it’s like to bury a child. I did: Seth Rich.”

SNIPERS!!!

America’s Rigged Elections a Sick Joke

 

Good research summarizes the debacle of 2016.

How The Democratic Party Stole The Primary From Sanders In 2016-Then Tried To Cover Up Their Crime

I don’t believe in polls from CNN

 

#CNN & #MSNBC Both Caught Meddling in US Democracy | #FakeNews

Both CNN and MSNBC have just put out fraudulent claims about Presidential polls.

Bias is clearly to attack Bernie Sanders, the actual front runner, and prop up establishment hawk (and hack) Joe Creepy Uncle Biden.

CNN rigged a poll to censor out nearly everyone under 45 years of age. Based on this nonsensical false sampling they claim Biden is now in the lead.

MSNBC was caught making up false numbers to report, increasing Biden from an actual 25% approval to a magical 28%, just enough to edge out Bernie Sanders. But this is a fraud, deliberate journalistic malfeasance at the highest levels. How could such a thing happen?

How could it not?

Comcast executive to host Joe Biden fundraiser

Comcast owns NBC.

MSNBC is also that bastion of journalistic integrity that hired an exposed CIA mole, Ken Dilanian, to feed its viewers propaganda about “national security.”

MSNBC also made hysterical, highly dangerous, and false claims about the Russians’ ability and intention to shut down America’s electrical grid, a completely false story that was retracted as soon as it went out by the Washington Post. This kind of unhinged war propaganda could lead the world straight to Armageddon.

Now, the parties truly “meddling in America’s democracy” should be very clear, although I can only scratch the surface here concerning the long history of media corruption and outright lies broadcast all the time.

 

 

PS

CNN’s complete fraud: