Posts Tagged ‘free speech’

Holder, Barr, DOJ and FBI Outed in Slimy Plot Against Assange

BREAKING: Iran’s Press TV website seized by U.S. government, according to notice

Biden shows his commitment to press freedom. Where’s Julian, by the way?

Could this be the first salvo in the next illegal war crime?

Is Iran suddenly silenced, so that US and partners can attack them without counterarguments?

Facebook Bans Redfish For Commemorating Nazi Defeat

Is Facebook run by closet Nazis?

The same sort of thing has happened to me personally TWICE.

If FB can’t tell the pro-Nazis from the anti-Nazis, they need to be taught a hard fucking lesson fast.



“Wokeness” is something other than morality. It’s an ideology controlled by bumper sticker memes rather than facts and logic. And it’s a mess.

Somebody IS


A Tweet sends police to an America activist’s house with false claims about non-existent “threats.”

The person has a loose tie to Russian media (Soapbox), and so this implies an intelligence component to the incident.

Anti-war activist visited by police after posting embarrassing AOC video

In the linked article, Max Blumenthal fails to report the Soapbox/Russian media linkage. Bad, Max. That’s the entire key to this.

Each of the Maffick Media-run Facebook pages — Soapbox, Waste-Ed, Backthen and In The Now — includes a disclaimer about Maffick’s ties to RT. 

“‘Soapbox’ is a political opinion brand of Maffick, which is owned and operated by Anissa Naouai and Ruptly GmbH, a subsidiary of RT,” the Soapbox “about” section read as of Monday afternoon…

Facebook’s decision to take down the pages on Feb. 15 came after a CNN investigation that probed Maffick Media’s ties to the Russian government. CNN found that 51 percent of the company is owned by Ruptly, while the other 49 percent is owned by a former RT presenter and Maffick’s CEO.

Facebook restores previously suspended Russia-linked pages

PPS — UPDATE 2!


Facebook has reversed its reversal, and now attacked me about 10 times for the same post made a year ago. The post is simply the guy who invented fascism giving the definition of fascism (Mussolini). Apparently Facebook is a blatantly fascist enterprise and it doesn’t want you to know what it’s doing.

#

Fuckerberg’s dystopian nightmare is finally coming into view. This is now not allowed to be known :

Previously, they censored Goebbels saying to blame the other side for the crimes you perpetrate. People are no longer allowed to know anything about fascism, and we see the results. They fucking don’t.

It seems these corporations are fighting on the wrong side and punishing those who oppose the fascism they are now supporting. In Zuckerland, Ignorance is Bliss–does saying that go against their ridiculous “Community Standards” too?



PS

UPDATE: Things moved quickly this time.

  1. They rejected my “disagreeing” with the decision.
  2. They also dinged me 5 times for the same post, a way of making the offense count five times instead of one?
  3. A new review system is in place, where you make an account to “appeal” which I did.
  4. After a lengthy, sarcastic as fuck “appeal” they REVERSED the decision.
  5. HOWEVER–They didn’t link the reversal to the appeal, with no apparent connection. It could have been one of the three “disagreements” I had previously done. The Zuckerberg labyrinth remains intact. Who knows how anything was decided, since they don’t have to tell you anything. They most certainly will not take the appeal to be a catalyst for examining their own practices.
But Wait, There’s More! (of course there is)

Anti-war news

Fighting back the censorship of the oligarchs will require new platforms and migrations.

The population, however, remains highly propagandized and borderline useless.

“This case is about Parler’s demonstrated unwillingness and inability to remove from the servers of Amazon Web Services (‘AWS’) content that threatens the public safety,” Amazon wrote, “such as by inciting and planning the rape, torture, and assassination of named public officials and private citizens.”

The response highlights more than a dozen examples that Amazon said it reported to Parler, including calls for a civil war and the deaths of Democratic lawmakers; tech company CEOs including Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey; members of professional sports leagues; former Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao; and US Capitol Police, among others.

Amazon slams Parler in court reply

gabbard-9-11-dore-censored-fb.jpg

 

FACEBOOK continues shadow censorship and interference in US election process. Tulsi Gabbard interviews are now censored: a sitting US Congresswoman and candidate for the Presidency. Bogus claims of “abusive” are allowed to stand by the corporation, arbitrary, false justifications for censoring political speech.
 
This is an attack on alternative media voices, who ask questions they refuse to ask on network corporate television. It is a means of controlling the public discourse. The ban on the Dore/Gabbard 9/11 video remains in place a day after I vociferously complained to Facebook about the censorship of political speech.
This is the exact mechanism they used to censor one of my articles about the Gabbard v. Clinton fight.

small-WRECKINGBALLS-cover-cirrenmtcheck it

 

copyright-orange_0.png

 

Life-Altering Copyright Lawsuits Could Come to Regular Internet Users Under a New Law Moving in the Senate

 

This bill creates a situation where Internet users could easily be on the hook for multiple $5,000 copyright infringement judgments without many of the traditional legal safeguards or rights of appeal our justice system provides.