The shameless and yet shameful deliberate lies of the Frnakenfood industry continue to pile up and contort the very purpose of science.
Assembling big lists of studies supposedly providing overwhelming evidence of the safety of GMOs has become common practice by GMO proponents. GENERA is just the latest in a long series of such lists. The success of the tactic depends on the reading public failing to examine the actual studies and seeing what they say.
“However, this review suffers from serious defects, such as:
- classifying relatively short studies as long-term, even though they only follow the animals for a fraction of their natural lifespan
- including animal production studies designed to examine parameters such as meat or milk production, which do not look for health effects
- including studies on fish and birds, which have a different digestive system and metabolism from those of humans and are not relevant to assessing human health risks
- including studies in which the sample sizes are too small to draw any conclusions
- including a study in which animals were removed from the experiment for undefined reasons and replaced (naturally this study concluded the GMO was safe!)
- using unscientific double standards in dismissing the findings of studies that find toxic effects on the grounds of methodological weaknesses, while accepting at face value the findings of studies that conclude safety, even though they suffer from the same methodological weaknesses.”