Posts Tagged ‘Idlib’

1-al-nusra-white-helmets-mi6

Advertisements

AP_17105594220364.jpg

 

It’s Orwell’s world now.

Al Jazeera, CNN & BBC Cover Up Genocidal Crimes of US – Backed Syrian Rebels

Despite their supposed commitment to “democracy” and self-determination in Syria, the media outlets that support the regime-change narrative promoted by foreign governments have conveniently omitted these facts from their coverage. For instance, Al Jazeera, funded by the Daesh (ISIS) and rebel-supporting Qatari government, refused to even mention the fact that the victims were Muslim Shiites, as well as omitting the fact that the attack occurred in al-Qaeda territory – even going so far as to imply that the attack was perpetrated by the Syrian government

The BBC, funded by the pro-Syrian opposition British government, also insinuated that Assad’s forces were to blame for the attack, even claiming that the attack “would not be in the rebels’ interest” despite the fact that extremist Syrian rebels have been calling for the massacre of all Muslim Shiites in Syria for years and that even the U.S. government has admitted that anti-Assad groups, particularly Daesh, are committing acts of genocide against those of different faiths.

In addition, most mainstream media coverage – from CNN to the Huffington Post – has concluded that there was “no evidence” that rebels were involved in the attack or that no one could be blamed as “no group had claimed responsibility.”

2017_0413por_.jpg
New Revelations Belie Trump Claims on Syria Chemical Attack

58ef45fbc46188d96c8b457e (1).jpg

 

‘I don’t believe a word of it’ – CIA whistleblower

12military-articleLarge.jpg

“a serious, intolerable situation”

Theodore Postol, professor of national security policy at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), questioned more and now joins RT America’s Alexey Yaroshevsky to offer his expertise and insight.

link

58e433a5c361887d748b463f

How Al Qaeda Played Donald Trump And The American Media
Mainstream American media outlets have willingly and openly embraced a narrative provided by Al Qaeda affiliates whose record of using chemical weapons in Syria and distorting and manufacturing “evidence” to promote anti-Assad policies in the west, including regime change, is well documented.

Al Nusra has a long history of manufacturing and employing crude chemical weapons; the 2013 chemical attack on Ghouta made use of low-grade Sarin nerve agent locally synthesized, while attacks in and around Aleppo in 2016 made use of a chlorine/white phosphorous blend.  If the Russians are correct, and the building bombed in Khan Sheikhoun on the morning of April 4, 2017 was producing and/or storing chemical weapons, the probability that viable agent and other toxic contaminants were dispersed into the surrounding neighborhood, and further disseminated by the prevailing wind, is high.

The counter-narrative offered by the Russians and Syrians, however, has been minimized, mocked and ignored by both the American media and the Trump administration. So, too, has the very illogic of the premise being put forward to answer the question of why President Assad would risk everything by using chemical weapons against a target of zero military value, at a time when the strategic balance of power had shifted strongly in his favor.

download.jpg

Of course it is, and of course the brainwashed western publics don’t care.

“Unfortunately, based on totally fake information, the United States, France and Great Britain have once again planted – one cannot put it any other way – into the U.N. Security Council a draft resolution which has a completely anti-Syrian character,” the RIA Novosti agency quoted Zakharova as saying.

Russia: proposed U.N. Syria resolution based on “fake information”

I have chronicled a tsunami of lies from those same false sources since 2012.

PS

My September 2013 piece:

DOUBTS ABOUT WHO IS USING CHEMICAL WEAPONS IN SYRIA