“ALL THE EXCITEMENT OF COMIC BOOKS WITH A LOT MORE SUBSTANCE”
-Tome Tender
“DOES NOT DISAPPOINT!”
-Author Brittany Seguin
Find us on Facebook too.
“IT’S THE HUNGER GAMES MEETS THE WALKING DEAD!”
-Anime Reporter
“THIS BOOK WAS AMAZING!”
-Reading My Reality
That video posted yesterday about the NY Times is being “demonetized” by Youtube, with the large propaganda platforms acting in unison to attack critics. They haven’t claimed that there is anything inaccurate or false in the video, only that people who produce that kind of content can’t make any money at it.
I’ve compressed all the reviews into these compendiums, except for a few exceptional titles:
Burning
This Korean crime drama takes too long to get moving, with a sad sack of a protagonist–a writer, of course. It does bring a memorable ending though.
Mary Queen of Scots
Like many, I’m absolutely entranced by Saoirse Ronan and Margot Robbie as well. I meant to review this in full, but nobody reads reviews anymore. I wasn’t sure how closely they stuck to the real history, as the writer even admitted to fabricating a key scene. Is history improved through embellishment?
Ask Me Anything
This oddball story twists everything at the end. That’s the best thing I can say about it.
Humans S3
I thought I had reviewed this, as I…
View original post 401 more words
WASHINGTON, July 6, 2018 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Ralph Nader today sent a letter to President Trump criticizing the administration’s actions in Yemen. Text of the letter follows:
President Donald Trump
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20500Dear President Trump:
It has become overwhelmingly clear that your Administration has supported with arms sales, refueling, daily operational logistics and other ways and means the governmental actors opposing the rebels in the Yemeni Civil war.
The bombing raids and blockades combine to produce what international relief organizations are calling the worst humanitarian crisis in the world today. With an estimated 8 million people on the brink of starvation, with the largest cholera epidemic in the world, Yemen is suffering daily deliberate war crimes affecting civilians, children, homes, schools, hospitals, drinking water installations, food supplies, and other critical infrastructures. These war crimes violate our Constitution, federal statutes, and international treaties, including the Geneva Conventions.
As President, you know full well what is going on and yet you keep getting our country deeper into this deadly quagmire. By any standard of international law, you are a knowing aider and abettor of these war crimes at a level of complicity that approximates being a backroom partner in the broad range of military operations against millions of innocent Yemeni families.
Have you no compassion? Have you no desire to put a stop to this war on civilians, a deliberate war to destroy the life-sustaining goods and services that keep millions of Yemenis alive. Just this week, your allies blew up a new Doctors Without Borders clinic that was about to open. Some of the doctors are Americans. Have you no decency left even to protect American relief workers who display immense courage and love for their fellow human beings? In its July 2018 three part on the ground series about the War in Yemen, the PBS News Hour showed unexploded bombs with the label, “Made in Garland, Texas,” as just one concrete indication of U.S. involvement.
What are the specific legal authorizations? Has Congress appropriated funds for and authorized military intervention in Yemen? Did you not swear to uphold the Constitution when you took office after being selected by the Electoral College in 2016?
History will judge you harshly for not even seeking to be a serious peacemaker, using the major levers you have in this conflict.
What is your response to the American people?
Sincerely,
Ralph Nader
Unfortunately, this isn’t particularly new. It is a good analysis of the two-party fraud of a system though.
The gist of the Guardian piece is that the findings of the aforementioned journalists are not credible because they are being “used by Russia” to justify Russia’s foreign policy in regards to Syria.
First of all, the Guardian’s premise is rather absurd to begin with, as according to international law, Russia’s presence in Syria is fully legal while that of the countries that back the White Helmets (the US, UK and France, among others) is illegal.
Consequently, the presence of a so-called NGO like White Helmets (in reality they are handsomely funded by western governments) is also illegal as they are operating in Syria without the consent of the Syrian government and without any mandate from the United Nations.
Very good article in UK Independent today:
