Posts Tagged ‘information’

jon_stewart_interviews_donald_rumsfeld.jpg

 

Jimmy Dore is the no-budget version of Jon Stewart’s Daily Show, if Jon Stewart had integrity and honesty and wasn’t concerned about being a highly paid tool. Stewart’s show had slick production values, and it also praised war criminals and helped the worst humans in our society peddle their latest books.

 

Tulsi calls out Hillary:

HMFQNPD53YI6TMPTWIZ74WAR54

 

Even the Washington Post (which I do not generally trust) is starting to shit itself in the face of blatant fascism.

Greenwald:

The First Amendment is meaningless if it only protects people the government recognizes as journalists

 

 

General-David-Petraeus-008

 

Revealed: US spy operation that manipulates social media

 

But I thought “meddling” and disinformation were bad things?

croppedbook-e1410368636108

TOP 25 CENSORED STORIES

There’s a one-click response to any deluded Pollyannas who believe we have a “free press” in this country. No. We have a very expensive, highly selective press. We have a press controlled by 6 corporations with wide-ranging interests and conflicts of interest. To believe otherwise is ignorant and foolish.

ShadowProof – New Link

Posted: September 30, 2015 in -
Tags: , , , ,

sp-logo

Kevin Gosztola has a project that’s very informative…

http://shadowproof.com/

c7384b00e473abc0852700500e469299

Question: “Do you have any people being paid by the CIA who are contributing to a major circulation — American journal?”

Answer: “We do have people who submit pieces to American journals.”

Question: “Do you have any people paid by the CIA who are working for television networks?”

Answer: “This I think gets into the kind of uh, getting into the details Mr. Chairman that I’d like to get into in executive session.”

(later)

Question: “Do you have any people being paid by the CIA who are contributing to the national news services — AP and UPI?”

Answer: “Well again, I think we’re getting into the kind of detail Mr. Chairman that I’d prefer to handle at executive session.”

CIA Admits to Congress the Agency Uses Mainstream Media to Distribute Disinformation: 1975 Video

assange-embassy

Newsweek finally cares about Assange?

Julian Assange: Why I Founded Wikileaks

“The question then arises as to what kinds of information will produce behavior which is just and disincentivize behavior which is unjust.”

us-mainstream-media-bias.si

RT’s Huge Study of American media’s corruption and collusion with power.

Ultimate Guide to Mainstream Media

163883590-100261016-primary.idge

Try and clean up your web presence… try…

Doxxing defense: Remove your personal info from data brokers

honey-pot

In a classic honey pot trap a crude photo was sent mysteriously out into the chain to be picked up and passed on in order to DISCREDIT anyone vouching for it.

APAssociated Propaganda takes point:

Russian TV says photo shows Ukrainian fighter downed Malaysian plane; US rejects that claim

“Mark Solonin, a Russian author who is an engineer by training, said in his blog that both aircraft looked disproportionate to the landscape and concluded that their images were crudely edited into a satellite picture.

Others noted that the commercial airliner in the photo appears to be of a different type, a Boeing 767.”

Probably all true. The question is why? Who created an obvious fake photo showing what likely actually happened?

This isn’t the only fake or forgery going around. The audio “confession” of Donetsk commanders, which is up on the NY Times website, is a glaring fraud:

Kiev’s evidence of militia’s responsibility for airliner crash faked – expert

Only that particular fraud tells us a lot more about the actual shoot down operation. It was prepared PRIOR to the downing of MH17. It is a recording concerning the shoot down of a Ukraine SU-25 the day before, July 16th, not the 17th. Therefore this audio PSYOP was prepared and executed knowingly (by Ukraine intelligence working with CIA) in order to specifically blame the rebel commander.

More deception concerns BBC’s censoring of eyewitnesses who saw the Ukraine fighter jet in the same airspace as the destroyed Malaysian airliner.

Censorship or error? Internet criticism for BBC removal of MH17 report

So, to recap, this latest photo is a fake. It is faked in order to make you look bad if you present it as evidence. It exists to discredit YOU. Tellingly, the Toledo Blade (AP) wouldn’t even show the actual photo, as it looks too much like what actually occurred! They merely comment using bloggers as their sources.

Faked photo, of questionable sourcing – DO NOT USE:

FAKED-MH17-IMAGE-PSYOP

This is a honey trap ploy to discredit Russian media. I suggest you read my piece on disinformation and the 9/11 Truth Movement to get up to speed on how this stuff distorts reality.

PS

Many people jumping over here from Disinformation. Other relevant info to the MH-17 includes the Russian presentation from back in July. Radar data showed the fighter plane:

Russian MH17 Evidence Against Ukraine Nazi Regime

The Russians tested the nose cannon from the SU-25 to compare damage:

MH-17: THE UNTOLD STORY

syrian-rebels-fsa

If half this article is true then America may be exiting the empire business a lot quicker than the Romans or the British before them. So many tears from the CIA recruiters, although questioning the policy of aggressive, illegal war against other nations is beyond their pay grade.

The background info on these fighters is next to nothing and misleading, especially in Syria, where we don’t have a liaison relationship, and so the vast majority of even check-the-box vetting is by third parties [who are] out-of-the-country players with a stake in the game.”

Looks a lot like knowingly giving material support to terrorists. I don’t believe there is an exception clause for your motivation for doing so. These are conspiracies, crimes, war crimes, crimes against the peace: Nuremberg violations. And of course they are directly on the wrong side of the bogus “war on terrorism.” Welcome to the CIA.

It’s like running a want-ad that says, ‘Only Moderates Show Up for Free Weapons and Paid Training,’ and believing that is effective screening.”
Inside the CIA’s Syrian Rebels Vetting Machine

watch_commander

 

Obama’s “Counterterrorism Center” feeds info to Associated Propaganda to get their version out before independent outlet can publish.

Spy Agency Stole Scoop From Media Outlet And Handed It To The AP

NY Times jammed its claws into this meat too with a very strangely misleading set of numbers. In the first paragraph — the one everyone reads — they claim:

“of whom about 5,000 have been placed on one or more watch lists”

 Then, in the 4th paragraph, where fewer than half of readers are likely still reading, given the data presented at the top…

“Over all, the number of people listed in the center’s database of terrorism suspects surpassed one million in June 2013, the documents said. Of those, approximately 680,000 were on the watch lists,”

Say what?

They claim 5,000 are on watch lists. They claim 680,000 are on watch lists.

Sense?

The Times is downplaying the severity by misleading readers at the top of the story.  And it’s blatant. It makes no sense at all, except as propaganda.

 

PS

Could it be fuzzy math???