Posts Tagged ‘jets’

FILE - This undated file image posted on a militant website on Tuesday, Jan. 14, 2014 shows fighters from the al-Qaida linked Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) marching in Raqqa, Syria. Once a vibrant, mixed city considered a bastion of support for President Bashar Assad, the eastern city of Raqqa is now a shell of its former life, transformed by al-Qaida militants into the nucleus of the terror group's version of an Islamic caliphate they hope one day to establish in Syria and Iraq. In rare interviews with The Associated Press, residents and activists in Raqqa describe a city where fear prevails, music has been banned, Christians have to pay religious tax in return for protection and face-veiled women and pistol-wielding men in jihadi uniforms patrol the streets. (AP Photo/militant website, File)

French jets bomb ISIS command center, other targets in Raqqa
P.S.

Dr. Peter Dale Scott notes:

Prominent in US newspapers are stories reporting how France’s air strikes on Raqqa, the capital of Daesh (the Islamic State) are “retaliation” for the bombings in Paris. There has been much less reporting of Daesh’s previous proclamation that the bombings in Paris “were retaliation for French airstrikes [five days earlier] against the group in Syria and Iraq.” (Wall Street Journal, November 14, 2015). I noticed even less media attention to the French bombing of Raqqa on November 8. (This was bombing that France, insanely, “hoped might be pre-emptive,” – New York Times, November 16, 2015)

cover2c

Kevin Ryan is meticulous, analytical and a longstanding expert on the September 11th attacks.  What’s more he paid a price for questioning the official claims, and he lost his job at Underwriters Laboratory for disputing claims about the World Trade Center steel construction beams.  His new book is one to take seriously.

Here is an article concerning NORAD and the ever-changing story of how they allowed 4 planes to attack their targets unhindered.

The Case Against Ralph Eberhart, NORAD’s 9/11 Commander

“The fourth and final story from NORAD was the official account given by the 9/11 Commission Report, now supported by NORAD.  In this explanation NORAD received “no advance notice” on any of the last three hijacked airliners.[11]  Instead of 20 minutes’ notice on Flight 175, and 14 minutes’ notice on Flight 77, and 47 minutes’ notice on Flight 93, we were told that NORAD was not notified about any of them until it was too late.  The military was off the hook entirely.

All the evidence for notifications and response, which had constituted the official account for nearly three years, had been thrown out the window.  In place of these documents and testimonies, new explanations were given for why the scrambled aircraft never reached the hijacked airliners. These included unbelievable claims of communication failures and misdirection of the scrambled jets, as well as the introduction of a never-before mentioned “Phantom 11” scenario.[12]”

…FAA official Laura Brown wrote a memo to the 9/11 Commission in which she stated that FAA shared “real-time information” with NORAD about “loss of communication with aircraft, loss of transponder signals, unauthorized changes in course, and other actions being taken by all the flights of interest, including Flight 77.”[14]