Posts Tagged ‘law enforcement’

 

SHAUN KING: A Private Law Enforcement Group on Facebook is Literally Plotting to Kill Me

5936664bc3618889518b4599

London Bridge terrorist was allowed to work at Westminster station despite known jihadist views
Khuram Shazad Butt, one of the three London Bridge attackers, was allowed to work at Westminster Tube station, even after he featured in a TV documentary about British jihadists in which he prayed to a black flag in Regent’s Park.

He was also free to carry out Saturday’s atrocity despite working for a man accused of helping to train the 7/7 bombings ringleader, and being investigated by police and MI5, it has emerged.

 

cop7916

Police Use of Deadly Force: State Statutes 30 Years after Garner

Chad Flanders and Joseph C. Welling

“So two trends, working in opposite directions, made the common law rule otiose: the death penalty was becoming rarer, but more crimes (and more nonviolent crimes) were becoming felonies. To these two trends the Court added a third: it was getting easier to use deadly force.[54] Before, deadly force was mainly inflicted by hand to hand combat, that is, after a fight. Nowadays, police can kill with one pull of a trigger. There may be, in such a world, a greater need for caution in using force–and for a rule which would discourage the use of force unless and until it was really necessary.[55]…

 

jamescomey

Obama Should Demand FBI Director James Comey’s Resignation Today

John Kiriakou pushes the FBI “incompetence” theory.

Deliberate incompetence, sabotage of terrorism cases, is also a likely factor, given what we know about FBI, CIA and previous spectacular attacks, 9/11 included as well as the Boston Bombing fiasco. Calling something incompetence is convenient and knee-jerk, but ignores the chain of command, the orders, the foreign policy support to terrorists in Chechnya and Syria, the command responsibility of those at the top.

Decisions are multi-layered, and this kind of work is often manipulated behind the scenes…

“But something ought to change, and quickly: that is the consistent failure of the FBI to do its job, to infiltrate domestic and foreign terrorist groups, and to prevent attacks on U.S. soil. This is not something new. The FBI has been incompetent for a very long time.

Orlando shooter Omar Mateen reportedly had planned the massacre “for a long time,” according to CNN. Over the past several weeks, he had attempted to buy military-grade body armor, and he had successfully purchased a Glock semi-automatic handgun and a long gun. And the FBI did nothing.”

 

_70695973_69400854

by Joe Giambrone

Join with us in our campaign to ensure that every police officer working the streets in this country wears a body camera.”
-Brown Family Statement

Let a real evolutionary leap come out of this Ferguson fiasco. Police will be required to wear body cameras at all times when on duty. Their actions will be recorded and not fall into the black hole where only one side of a story remains, as dead men tell no tales.

Police are to be held to a higher standard than the rest of us for several reasons. It is their job to enforce laws, and they are given discretion as well as deadly weaponry to do so. Regular citizens have no such priviledge. Police are a special case where accountability, oversight, accuracy, and the public trust need to be maintained. Right now these are all at an all-time low.

Paterson, Newark and Jersey City plan on equipping their forces with body cameras, and this is just the beginning. “The federal court in New York has ordered some police officers to carry cameras, while departments in Albuquerque, Fort Worth, Texas, and Oakland, California, have voluntarily started the practice.”

This is still a land of sovereign citizens with Constitutionally protected rights. As such we need to make sure that these rights are not systematicallly stripped away by law enforcement that operates above the law, beyond the law, outside the law. How much more difficult would it be for a dirty cop whose shifts are recorded? Think about it.

The Michael Brown slaying, whether one wishes to believe it or not, is an unclear situation. We have only the testimony of the officer, and some forensic evidence that may or may not have come about as claimed by the officer. If the officer was wearing a body camera then this entire shooting incident would be recorded frame by frame without the possibility of embellishment or of deception. It would also provide clear evidence against the assailant… or not.

The body camera has proven to be one of the most powerful and revolutionary tools of community policing to come about in decades. Where they have been in use, “public complaints against officers plunged 88% compared with the previous 12 months. Officers’ use of force fell by 60%.

In a land where the police are turning into militarized organizations from out of 1984, or The Hunger Games, we are now at a crossroads. Either all that rhetoric about freedom, liberty, rights, law and order was meant to be taken seriously, or else we are to tolerate a fascistic system of double standards and unaccountable state power, including the wholesale murder in the streets of the poor and of minorities.

It’s time we put the solutions on the front page. Sixty percent decrease of police use of force. Nearly ninety percent reduction in citizen complaints. That means better policing, honest policing, trust built with the communities they are meant to serve. That is a solution that is beyond money, beyond empty slogans and has already been proven to work.

The White House has already responded to a petition demanding body cameras on police officers. Empty rhetoric so far, the usual bland say nothing, do nothing vapidity of politiicians. This is going to take citizens to stand up and demand a just system of justice. It will take awareness, political pressure and local action across the land. The structures of police departments are largely local and respond to local pressure.

Even the ACLU has gotten on board the recording of on-duty police officers. While the unaccountable surveillance of the public remains a violation of the 4th Amendment, the oversight of policing falls into a different category. ACLU policy analyst Jay Stanley said that, “all parties stand to benefit — the public is protected from police misconduct, and officers are protected from bogus complaints.” Interactions with police tend to be kept to a higher standard when there is a video record of everything said and done.

I have no idea if Michael Brown is the best icon for this cause, but he is clearly one of many, many victims of police violence against civilians in the US. Today there are 8,790,000 videos of “police brutality” searchable through Google. These are not taken as seriously as an official record, from the officer’s own body camera. Yet they are all one would need to make a reasoned case that it is time to hold police to the standard of the law.

Society only works when the social contract is honored by all parties. The citizens of Ferguson are telling us this week that one party has broken this contract.


Joe Giambrone publishes Political Film Blog.

swat-goons

How Police Became a Standing Army

“Rise of the Warrior Cop: The Militarization of America’s Police Forces”

You’re going to want to think really hard whether you want to risk calling the police in the future … for anything.

Borg-Queen

“Users (authorized or unauthorized) have no explicit or implicit expectation of privacy. Any or all uses of this system and all files on the system may be intercepted, monitored, recorded, copied, audited, inspected, and disclosed to authorized state government and law enforcement personnel, as well as authorized officials of other agencies, both domestic and foreign.”

Kentucky “Health Benefit Exchange” website

 

Not only are you required to submit your entire life to government oversight, they can give your private medical information to FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS at will.  While you, on the other hand, can be prosecuted if you look at them funny.  I’m sure this total surveillance of every aspect of your life makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside.  This seems to follow the Borg principle: resistance is futile.

Thanks Obama, because what America really wants is totalitarianism!

enemy-of-the-state_420Enemy of the State, 1998

 

by Joe Giambrone

“I’m an upstanding citizen and I’m not doing anything wrong.  I just don’t want the government invading my privacy.”

–unnamed

I got into a heated argument, a disagreeable shouting match over that idea today – mostly being shouted at for nitpicking someone on my own side.  I find the above rationale to be a surface response without any thought behind it or any acknowledgement of how actual surveillance-societies of the past devolved into Orwellian abominations.  Worse still, the current drive for a “Total Information Awarenesssociety, where birth to death communications will be stored forever by the government, looms over us.

NSA / Booz Allen Hamilton whistleblower Edward Snowden has said:

“…they are intent on making every conversation and every form of behavior in the world known to them.”

To that end the NSA’s operating budget has increased steadily, avoiding any cutbacks from the so-called “sequester.”  The new NSA storage facility in Utah is a central piece of this total data capture society.

“An article by Forbes estimates the storage capacity as between 3 and 12 exabytes in the near term… advances in technology could be expected to increase the capacity by orders of magnitude in the coming years.” (Wikipedia)

NSA Whistleblower William Binney revealed further problems at the National Security Agency and its runaway capabilities:

“Binney alleged… controls that limited unintentional collection of data pertaining to U.S. citizens were removed, prompting concerns by him and others that the actions were illegal and unconstitutional.  Binney alleged that the Bluffdale (Utah) facility was designed to store a broad range of domestic communications for data mining without warrants.” (Wikipedia)

Edward Snowden has also said:

“I also had the capability without any warrant to search for, seize, and read your communications.  Anyone’s communications at any time.  That is the power to change people’s fates.”

Changing people’s fates is the key phrase here.  How and why can this personal data be used?  With lifelong surveillance of everyone, we are little better off than goldfish swimming from glass wall to wall, always under the complete scrutiny of the authorities.  It doesn’t take any imagination whatsoever to see the implications of total scrutiny by secretive government or quasi-governmental entities (or others!).

The STASI regime in East Germany was legendary for this type of behavior, monitoring their own people allegedly for their own good.  A hyper-paranoid society emerged where everyone was suspect.  Anyone could be an informant coerced by the authorities into betraying their neighbors or family members.  Trust of government was nonexistent, and soon all trust throughout the society crumbled.  Any stranger could be a government agent, himself blackmailed by the state into carrying out their wishes.

Guilt by Association

The problem is blackmail.  That is what Edward Snowden meant when he talked about changing people’s fates.  When all associations are known to authorities, the very act of communicating with someone becomes dangerous.  If they are found to be displeasing to the secretive masters of society, then how long before your very real, recorded linkage to them becomes problematic as well?  Guilt by association and character assassinations do not require you to be “doing anything wrong,” only to be perceived that way as a result of smears.  Sensitive data about personal habits can destroy a political campaign before it ever begins.  The manipulation of the public takes many forms, which political activists and the professional political class understand well.

While Obama and Company (on both sides of the aisle) hawk this glaringly unconstitutional assault as alleged protection, being no threat to the public whatsoever – their vanilla lives deemed uninteresting enough to not concern the state – the terrifying nature of power and coercion must be addressed.  Before we follow the propaganda line that we are “not doing anything wrong,” and so have nothing to worry about, there is plenty to worry about when privacy is erased.

The legal justifications for securing our personal effects, enshrined in the 4th Amendment, represent the cornerstone of American freedom: that F-word that politicians blather on about at length even as they secretly betray it.

This is not simply a personal preference to be private, but the necessary precondition for a free society.  Private communications are the difference between what once was America and what once was the Soviet Union, or Orwell’s dystopia if you prefer.  The value of having secure, private lives free of government malfeasance and scrutiny is beyond a price and beyond debate.  As long as the Constitution remains the “Supreme Law of the Land,” those who willingly and gleefully violate it have committed treasons against the American People.

Personal preference has got nothing to do with it.  This is about the very nature of freedom, to be free of coercion and blackmail.  While it’s true that the government apparatus likely has nothing against most people because of their unremarkable ordinariness, this government posture changes immediately as people become politically active.  What the masters of society take very seriously are their own positions of power, and they brook no challengers.  Once a citizen becomes active in attempting to change official policy, all bets are off.

The US government surveils the lives of citizens who stand up and say “No.”  This has been in evidence since forever; name your time period.  But more recently from Seattle WTO protests 1999, to the anti-war movement 2003, to Miami FTAA opponents 2003, to the protestors at national political conventions, and of course to Occupy Wall Street activists the federal government has used all means at its disposal to invade the privacy of its citizen-opponents.  Ongoing surveillance of domestic political movements is the norm, as is infiltration by FBI “informants” (criminals who have made deals with FBI to go undercover and spy for them).

What’s more, the government contracts with private, for-profit spy corporations such as Booz, Allen Hamilton and Stratfor.  It hands this power to blanket spy on the entire citizenry over to private interests for them to exploit.  All this is done in secret, and the Congress cannot even oversee the activities of private contractors, who are naturally shielded from the kind of scrutiny which we are all now subject to by them.  If someone has no problem with the government owning all their personal data (I can’t imagine why), they surely must stop and think about turning over that power to private money-making corporations who are legally shielded from public accountability.

One of the most crucial and ignored whistleblowers to come out of the National Security Agency is a satellite analyst by the name of Russell Tice.  What Mr. Tice has revealed is shocking and largely un-reportable in the corporate perception-management media.  It would shake the very system to its core, and so recently Mr. Tice has been persona non grata on corporate airwaves.  Previously he was welcomed as an expert on the spying programs as an actual former NSA analyst.  After Tice revealed more damaging information, disclosures which threaten the very legitimacy of those who fail to perform Congressional oversight on the runaway surveillance agency, his spotlight was shut down.  Russell Tice finally revealed that for at least a decade now those at the top of the intelligence chain secretly abuse the capabilities of their federal surveillance state.

“[NSA] went after lawyers and law firms… They went after judges.  One of the judges is now sitting on the Supreme Court that I had his wiretap information in my hand… They went after State Department officials. They went after people in the executive service that were part of the White House — their own people!”

–NSA Satellite Analyst Russell Tice

Now a picture emerges of something quite a bit more damaging to society than simple privacy preferences.  According to Tice, those sitting in Congress and tasked with doing oversight on the spy agencies are themselves under surveillance and compromised.

  • Their loyalties and duties are compromised.
  • Their judgments are compromised.
  • Their repeated displays of gross ignorance about NSA programs are perhaps intentional, by design.

These Senators and Intelligence Committee Congresspersons must toe the line or face expulsion at the next election cycle (or worse).  That is how the NSA and its secretive doings can “change people’s fates.”

Is it too obvious to state that such blackmail is criminal and an assault on democracy?  This attack is on the American People, who are now at the mercy of a Vichy Congress, occupied by the STASI intelligence/surveillance state.

James Clapper, America’s current “Director of National Intelligence,” blatantly lied to Congress on live TV, March 12th.  Clapper claimed that NSA doesn’t collect Americans’ communications knowing full well that they do and are expanding this capability daily.  Clapper received no penalty whatsoever for Contempt of Congress, a criminal offense!  In the Alice in Wonderland world of Washington politics, instead of being jailed for a year for lying to the Congress, Mr. Clapper was voted in UNANIMOUSLY to take over all 16 of America’s spy agencies this August.

Clapper’s current version of the NSA Big Lie is that: “I realized later Sen. Wyden was asking about… metadata collection, rather than content collection…  Thus, my response was clearly erroneous, for which I apologize.”

But it’s not just “metadata,” and the metadata is only one component of the data collection, used to more easily search through the actual content that is also stored by the National Security Agency for varying lengths of time.  When the UK Guardian released this information, provided by Edward Snowden, their offices were later raided by British security forces and computer hard drives were destroyed, as in a typical Banana Republic assault on the press.

James Clapper continues to lie, and the liars have no disincentive to stop their officially-blessed fabricating.  Congressional oversight is negated absolutely, and the Congress remains powerless in the face of the Total Surveillance State – where they are prime targets for blackmail and coercion.

The official pattern has been to lie, backtrack to the next position and to maintain it until further revelations make the current story untenable.  Then, a new story is told with the theme being that regular, inactive, unengaged Americans have nothing to worry about; they are already neutralized.  The truth is that all Americans have plenty to worry about, the complete destruction of privacy and “freedom,” that buzzword that passes by without the slightest contemplation of what it means.  Rule by a secretive military / corporate dictatorship is simply not the “America” that people think of.  Surely it bears no resemblance to the “Land of the free.”  It is an entirely different and alien place.

So what’s your personal preference on that one?

Joe Giambrone publishes Political Film Blog, and his novel of Hollywood debauchery, Hell of a Deal, is available now.

maskedassholekdkdkdkdkd

The real New World Order…

Dangerous Minds: 

MASKED, heavily-armed paramilitary rent-a-cops are freaking out Wisconsin

 

Time to join Snowden in Iceland?

 

 

US-flag-upside-down copy

Open Letter to US Law Enforcement

Who are you, really?  And what exactly is your role in the bigger picture?

This is not an academic question, but goes to the heart of who is in charge and if they themselves are on the right side of the law.  With numerous whistleblowers from the National Security Agency coming forth, as well as from the Central Intelligence Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, all of them exposing crimes committed by those in charge, you should pay special attention to what these individuals are saying about current so-called “leaders.”

Former President Richard Nixon once said, Well, when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal.”

How many law enforcement officers would accept this excuse today?  How many have already accepted it as a fact of the current United States system of “justice?”

The 4th Amendment of the US Constitution, in the Bill of Rights, is explicitly clear that a “warrant” is necessary to invade the personal effects of civilians.  We are all mandated by the highest law in the land to be “secure” in our “persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.”

Government officials swear an oath of office to defend this Constitution, as you yourself have also probably done.

To knowingly, flagrantly and systematically violate this oath – in secret no less – is a grievous crime against the United States.  To do it with impunity and protection from prosecution, however, is something else entirely.  A government that does not respect the laws that it publicly swears to defend is a fraud and a tyranny.

To casually throw away the 4th Amendment, a bedrock freedom, the cornerstone of a free and open society, is not only unacceptable.  It is Treason, the waging of a war against the People of the United States.  By what right can Constitutionally guaranteed rights be deleted?  These protections have served us for more than two centuries, and yet in the age of technology they are to be dismissed without debate, by secret decree?  By memos that are classified “Top Secret” because they directly violate the Supreme Law of the Land?

Armies of police are to enforce these secret decrees as law and to assist the surveillance state without question?

Are we a nation of sovereign citizens or of human drones who execute instructions?

On April 19th of this year, the federal government “crossed the Rubicon” suspending the Constitution in Boston and ordering nearly 10,000 heavily armed troops to “lockdown” a major metropolitan city.  Homes were searched without warrants and invaded at gunpoint by squads and platoons of officers, many of them from the local force who had been militarized and placed under the command of federal authorities.  All this was done to apprehend a single injured suspect.

A Supreme Court decision already decided that the Constitution cannot be suspended no matter how inconvenient it may be perceived by those in power.  In Ex parte Milligan (1866), the Court wrote:

“The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times and under all circumstances. No doctrine involving more pernicious consequences was ever invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government.”

By testing this new suspension of the Constitution in the wake of the latest terrorism event in Boston, a cynical calculated play was made to convince people that the government somehow possessed the right to do so, when clearly no such right exists.  This outright subversion of Constitutional protections was tested that day to see if it could set a precedent and be sold to the public on the basis of allegedly protecting them.  This ploy used public perception as a means to subvert the law and to overturn the established restrictions on the government’s exercise of force here domestically against its own citizens in their homes!

This July 4th, 2013, it’s time to wake up and smell the clear felonies coming out of Washington DC.  Crimes of this scale and sweeping nature threaten to turn America into George Orwell’s Big Brother police state.  And law enforcement officers are not immune to the surveillance.  Their privacy is no more protected than mine.  Nor is the privacy of a Congressman or a Supreme Court Judge or even the head of the CIA, David Petraeus.

A high-level NSA whistleblower, a satellite analyst named Russell Tice, revealed:

“[NSA] went after lawyers and law firms… They went after judges. One of the judges is now sitting on the Supreme Court that I had his wiretap information in my hand… They went after State Department officials. They went after people in the executive service that were part of the White House — their own people.”

We are now a society wide open to blackmail.  We are without privacy, and can be hacked at the will of secret, often private contractors, such as Edward Snowden’s recent employer.  Mr. Snowden, remember, wasn’t working for the US government in an official capacity, but at the time was employed by a private corporation, Booz, Allen Hamilton.  Right now thousands of privately-paid computer “analysts” can wiretap anyone at their own discretion.

Edward Snowden said:

“Any analyst at any time can target anyone.  …I sitting at my desk certainly had the authorities to wiretap anyone, from YOU or your accountant to a federal judge to even the president if I had a personal email.”

That means you, the reader, are also vulnerable.  Your life is an open book, and should you in the future need to be coerced and blackmailed into silence or into acting in a particular manner, that can easily be arranged.  Information from your digital presence and history across telephone, web, credit card and any other channel is now stored indefinitely by this emerging, unconstitutional surveillance state.

That is not freedom.  That is not Constitutional governance.  That is not the America I was taught about in school, as were you.

That is why the flag flies upside down here today.

Joe Giambrone
July 4, 2013

I am not digging today’s news, people.  This country is all but flushed to hell.

Woman  Unlawfully Strip Searched, Arrested in Court While Judge Ignores Her

woman-arrested-in-court-sex-assault

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2LrbsUVSVl8

Some of us have been hollering about this linear cliff dive to police state totalitarianism for a lot of years.  Others play video games all day.

This video is what the police state looks like.  It’s unconstitutional.  There are no warrants.  There is no reasonable suspicion.  This is treating the citizens like criminals in their own homes arbitrarily, and if it is not opposed immediately, it is the end of the United States as a republic.  Oddsmakers are probably not giving the constitution and democracy much benefit of the doubt in Vegas right now.

Here is what the supreme court said about martial law practices in the past:

“Those great and good men foresaw that troublous times would arise when rulers and people would become restive under restraint, and seek by sharp and decisive measures to accomplish ends deemed just and proper, and that the principles of constitutional liberty would be in peril unless established by irrepealable law. The history of the world had taught them that what was done in the past might be attempted in the future. The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times {121} and under all circumstances. No doctrine involving more pernicious consequences was ever invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or despotism, but the theory of necessity on which it is based is false, for the government, within the Constitution, has all the powers granted to it which are necessary to preserve its existence, as has been happily proved by the result of the great effort to throw off its just authority.”
–U.S. Supreme Court, Ex Parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (4 Wall.), (1866)

Those instituting a police state right now should be impeached for treason.

police-state