An Open Murder (Investigation?)

After denying they had it, why is the FBI now trying to hide info about Seth Rich shooting from the public for 66 years?

New Court order on a Seth Rich FOIA lawsuit –

The FBI is ordered to "produce the information it possesses related to Seth Rich's laptop" within 14 days.

credit to @Ty_Clevenger pic.twitter.com/RO730Z7ik9

— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) September 29, 2022

War Crimes at OPCW

Aaron Maté testifies at UN on OPCW Syria cover-up

Maté was half a decade late to the party. This has been the fraud from the start in 2011-12. It’s been nothing but lies on every so-called “chemical weapons attack.”

Here’s UN investigator Carla Del Ponte in 2013:

So, Aaron–how do you ignore 5 years of precedent?

My 2012 piece:

Syria: The First Casualty…

My 2013 piece:

DOUBTS ABOUT WHO IS USING CHEMICAL WEAPONS IN SYRIA

My 2015 piece:

Why ISIS Exists: The Double Game

Seth Rich Conspiracy Lawsuit Moves Forward

 

For several years, fake, foundation-funded “progressive” media (propaganda) have been trying to shame people into shutting up about the unsolved murder of Seth Rich. Rich worked at the DNC, where those Hillary Clinton emails originated.

You should know that Rich’s name first surfaced when Julian Assange personally mentioned him in interviews, implying that he was connected to the release of sensitive documents from the DNC. No one has ever disproven this. Period.

 

Judge Amos Mazzant of U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruled Wednesday that the $57 million suit brought by Ed Butowsky makes plausible claims that the network may be liable for defamation for a series of online stories about Butowsky’s role in publicizing assertions that the murdered DNC staffer, Seth Rich, may have been involved in leaking Democratic emails.

Judge greenlights libel suit against NPR over Seth Rich reports

 

NPR argued that many of the claims in its reports, like assertions that Fox’s reporting on the Rich murder was “baseless” and “fake news,” amounted to opinion and not the kind of factual claims that can be the basis for a libel suit.

But Mazzant disagreed.

“The statements made by Folkenflik were made as verifiable statements of fact,” the judge wrote. “The statements at issue were not merely expressing a subjective view. Looking at the context of the verifiable facts, nothing shows the statements expressed Folkenflik’s opinion or merely offer Folkenflik’s personal perspective on disputed facts.”

NEW #Wikileaks Massive File Dump | #JulianAssange

 

BREAKING: New Wikileaks File Dump

 

It’s on.

 

The Indictment Against Assange

 

This thread discusses what the government’s case is. It centers on allegedly trying to help Manning crack a password.

WikiLeaks editor-in-chief Julian Assange was indicted on March 6, 2018, for "conspiracy to commit computer intrusion." Notably, not charge under Espionage Act. But doesn't mean political case isn't attack on journalist or media organization.

I'll go through rest of indictment. pic.twitter.com/j1ubNR69ge

— Kevin Gosztola (@kgosztola) April 11, 2019

Trump Junta Targets its own Staff!

Trump’s brand of “freedom,” if you had any doubts:

Upon entering Spicer’s office for what one person briefed on the gathering described as “an emergency meeting,” staffers were told to dump their phones on a table for a “phone check,” to prove they had nothing to hide.

Sean Spicer targets own staff in leak crackdown

 

Coleen Rowley: “Unholy Alliance”

 

‘Democrats & neocon warmongers formed unholy alliance against Trump’

Now There’s a Conspiracy Theory!

 

Did law enforcement and intelligence officers stage a counter-coup to Hillary’s criminal enterprise???

A certain someone just found herself not so above the law as she thought she was… but is she still? Halloween continues.

“We have initiated a counter-coup through Julian Assange and WikiLeaks.”

We can only hope this is the case, as they will be as likely to keep Trump honest too, if he manages to seize the White House next week. They could impeach his ass with all the dirt they must have stored on him.

Former Deputy Assist. Sec. of State Steve Pieczenik says intel agencies have united in a coup to stop a syndicate pic.twitter.com/tSsRyqESlk

— Anonymous (@LatestAnonNews) November 2, 2016

 

 

 

Assange: Clinton Arrest Coming

 

He just upped the ante.

Julian ASSANGE The next leak will lead to the arrest of Hillary CLINTON

Wikileaks: DNC Murder Conspiracy?

 

Assange promises new revelations about Clinton

 

DNC staffer Seth Rich may have been assassinated for leaking insider information to Wikileaks.

ANNOUNCE: WikiLeaks has decided to issue a US$20k reward for information leading to conviction for the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich.

— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) August 9, 2016

 

Assange does not want to reveal who leaked the emails, but it seems to suggest that it could be a staff member of the Democratic Party. “Our whistleblowers run serious risks in order to provide us with material. A 27-year-old man, Seth Rich, who worked for the DNC, was recently murdered. It is not known why. He walked on the streets of Washington.”

The CIA and Hollywood, an Unlawful Alliance

 

by John Kiriakou, Reader Supported News

Vice News’s Jason Leopoldreported recently that the CIA’s Office of Public Affairs (OPA) provided “support” to a variety of Hollywood films, like Argo and Zero Dark Thirty; television series like Covert Affairs and Top Chef; documentaries; and even novels like Richard Patterson’s The Devil’s Light. Leopold said that the nature of the support is largely unknown because the CIA did not keep records of all of its meetings. A declassified CIA Inspector General’s report said, “OPA and other CIA employees did not always comply with Agency regulations intended to prevent the release of classified information during their interactions with entertainment industry representatives.”

Therein lies one of the problems with the relationship between the CIA and Hollywood. There’s little-to-no oversight. And when rules and laws are broken, nobody has to pay the piper.

In 2015, Vice reported that aseparate CIA Inspector General’s report found that former Director Leon Panetta “allegedly disclosed classified information” when speaking with Zero Dark Thirty writer Mark Boal, and that Panetta disclosed additional classified information to director Kathryn Bigelow. An even earlier Inspector General’s report detailed “Potential Ethics Violations Involving Film Producers” Bigelow and Boal, and said that CIA officers had accepted gifts from the two, including watches, restaurant meals, and tickets to the movie premiere, all of which went unreported. Presumably, this was in exchange for cooperating on the film.

CIA employees taking gifts from Hollywood producers for apparently giving them, in the case of Zero Dark Thirty, classified briefings on the bin Laden raid and then not reporting the gifts in their ethics filings is bad enough. The CIA director leaking classified information with impunity to the producers is worse. Indeed, it is a direct violation of the Obama administration’s definition of espionage: “Providing national defense information to any person not entitled to receive it.” That definition came directly from the judge in my case, when I was charged with espionage for blowing the whistle on the CIA’s torture program.

But the worst, the most insidious, thing here is that the end result of the CIA’s cooperation with Hollywood and others in the entertainment industry is that it results in the propagandizing of the American people. That was illegal, until recently.

In the 1950s, the CIA initiated “Operation Mockingbird,” a long-term operation whereby the Agency planted articles in the American press. At the height of the program, some 25 major U.S. news outlets willingly published CIA propaganda meant for the American people.

That was outlawed in the immediate aftermath of the Church Committee hearings. Over time, many Americans forgot that the CIA had tried to influence them subversively. Indeed, many in Congress later said that the ban on propagandizing the American people was so that official outlets like the Voice of America and Radio and TV Marti could not be broadcast to Americans.

But that all changed on July 2, 2013, with the passage of the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, which passed as part of the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act. The new law allows a wide variety of propaganda meant for Americans. That includes CIA support for Hollywood.

Does this presage a period of television shows like The F.B.I., a series that ran from 1965-1974 and which had each episode personally approved by J. Edgar Hoover? Will Hollywood not be permitted to make movies or series critical of the Agency? Do we want John Brennan to be the guy who decides what we get to see?

Congress must re-implement the Smith-Mundt Act, the original one, and keep the government out of our movie theaters and televisions. Propaganda is a malicious force. It has no business in American society.

---

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

Fukushima Precipice: Michio Kaku

See what radiation does to human beings:

The Future Children of Fukushima