NBC Reporter Quits Over Endless War Propaganda

 

From January.

Full email from William Arkin

Russiagate Still Falling Apart

 

Assange is caught up in these games. The government claims “Guccifer 2” was:

1. A Russian intelligence person
2. The supplier of the Clinton emails

Both these claims look like nonsense. Guccifer 2 was a fraud created to frame Assange. It’s long and it’s tiresome.

Mueller’s Own Report Undercuts Its Core Russia-Meddling Claims

 

 

More important, as Raffi Khatchadourian has reported for The New Yorker, the documents Guccifer 2.0 released directly were nowhere near the quality of the material published by WikiLeaks. For example, on June 18, Guccifer 2.0 released documents that it claimed were from the DNC, “but which were almost surely not,” Khatchadourian notes. Neither was the material Guccifer 2.0 teased as a “dossier on Hillary Clinton from DNC.” The material Guccifer 2.0 initially promoted in June also contained easily discoverable Russian metadata. The computer that created it was configured for the Russian language, and the username was “Felix Dzerzhinsky,” the Bolshevik-era founder of the first Soviet secret police.

WikiLeaks only made contact with Guccifer 2.0 after the latter publicly invited journalists “to send me their questions via Twitter Direct Messages.” And, more problematic given the central role the report assigned to Guccifer 2.0, there is no direct evidence that WikiLeaks actually released anything that Guccifer 2.0 provided. In a 2017 interview, Assange said he “didn’t publish” any material from that source because much of it had been published elsewhere and because “we didn’t have the resources to independently verify.”

..

Assange also made public offers to testify before Congress. The Mueller report makes no mention of these overtures, though it does cite and dismiss “media reports” that “Assange told a U.S. congressman that the DNC hack was an ‘inside job,’ and purported to have ‘physical proof’ that Russians did not give materials to Assange.”

Mueller does not explain why he included Assange’s comments as reported by media outlets in his report but decided not to speak with Assange directly, or ask to see his “physical proof,” during a two-year investigation.

Official Secrets – Trailer

 

We live in a society where half the population can’t tell the heroes from the villains.

 

Rep. Gabbard: NBC’s “very intentional smear efforts”

Read this twice. Understand it.

REPRESENTATIVE TULSI GABBARD: Me and my campaign, we’ve been on the receiving end of very intentional smear efforts trying to undermine our campaign coming through NBC News, quoting articles that are completely baseless. Not just like hey you’ve got a couple of things wrong in it. No. Completely baseless.

I did an interview with George Stephanopolous. He’s like, “This article in The Daily Beast says Putin supports your campaign.”

Based on what? Nothing. Really, nothing. Because I have three donors out of nearly 80,000, who like me. Three Americans–I hate that I have to say that–three American donors. Susan Sarandon, one of them. Professor Stephen Cohen, another, both of whom are outspoken as I am saying: we need to de-escalate tensions between the United States and nuclear-armed countries like Russia and China, because otherwise we are headed down a path that inevitably takes us to nuclear war.

 

tulsi mocking george stephanopoulos is one of the greatest things you'll hear from any of the candidates pic.twitter.com/aIBxWyZ5t1

— Starrchild (@hexen220) June 9, 2019

IGS/UC Berkeley Rigged Poll Omitted Rep. Tulsi Gabbard From Choices

Only anti-war candidate Representative Tulsi Gabbard is omitted from this poll, a poll run by a publicly financed major university in California!

I’m not having it.

Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2019 1:29 PM
To: igs@berkeley.edu; mdicamillo@berkeley.edu; deanofstudents@berkeley.edu; chesse@berkeley.edu; auffhammer@berkeley.edu; lspd_appt@berkeley.edu; Randi.shussett@berkeley.edu; svogel@socrates.berkeley.edu; publicaffairs@calstate.edu; webservices@calstate.edu; tips@sacbee.com; tbyrne@sfchronicle.com; tips@latimes.com

Subject: Your June 13 Poll is FAKE NEWS, deliberately omits Congresswoman Gabbard from choices

UC Berkeley (a publicly funded university):

This is unacceptable and damages the integrity and reputation of your organization. I will be contacting others and writing about this absurdity of censoring out a sitting US Congresswoman with a clear suggestion to remove and fire whomever is responsible for rigging Berkeley’s political polls. You no longer can be trusted. What’s that worth to you?

https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7wx193w5

Fake polls that deliberately omit choices from respondents produce fake news: biased, nonsense results.

I am not interested in excuses, only in action to remedy the problems clearly evident in your department.

Joe Giambrone
CSU Graduate

 

Jimmy Dore: War Whores Lying Their Asses Off

 

Hypocrisy & Foreign Opposition Research

 

In the wake of Trump saying he’d like foreign dirt on opponents (again), the Democratic brainwashed Tweeter Brigade is out vomiting all over the net.

But they never had a problem with a UK SPY working for their candidate. A spy. From the UK, and most certainly not an American. This was a foreigner meddling in the election. They spin it away with the “special” status of Britain, them being friends and such, what hypocritical nonsense.

But even when that UK spy was exposed for using RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT SOURCES, they still have a remarkable capacity for not seeing a problem there. The hypocrisy meter is broken beyond repair.

Clinton & DNC lied and covered this up for about a year during election season:

Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier

How good were these sources? Consider what Steele would write in the memos he filed with Simpson: Source A—to use the careful nomenclature of his dossier—was “a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure.” Source B was “a former top level intelligence officer still active in the Kremlin.”

HOW EX-SPY CHRISTOPHER STEELE COMPILED HIS EXPLOSIVE TRUMP-RUSSIA DOSSIER

 

So, good luck talking facts and logic to Clintonites.