Posts Tagged ‘material support to terrorists’

1059124400

 

Warehouses Full of US-Made ‘Lethal Weapons’ Found by Syrian Army 

nusra-front-001.jpg

Al Qaeda in Syria now called  Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham.
What’s In A Name? U.S. Takes Syria’s Al-Qaeda Off Terror Watchlists

As CBC noted, “For the U.S. to designate HTS now would mean acknowledging that it supplied sophisticated weapons, including TOW anti-tank missiles, to ‘terrorists,’ and draw attention to the fact that the U.S. continues to arm Islamist militias in Syria.”

This is just the latest attempt by al-Nusra to rebrand itself as a “moderate” group, as it has used its commitment to being “anti-ISIS” and “anti-Assad” in order to convince the U.S. and its allies to arm them. Al-Nusra has been described by mainstream media as a “moderate opposition” group fighting against the embattled government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

 

Photo7.jpg

NATO member country Bulgaria supporting terrorism. “Regular supplies” through SAUDI ARABIA.

 

The Double Game

isisflag

 

(Many of us knew all along, by the way.)

 

We finally know what Hillary Clinton knew all along – US allies Saudi Arabia and Qatar are funding Isis

 

Clinton-wikipedia-618x411.jpg

What did she know and when did she know it?
In leaked emails, Clinton says Qatar was providing support to ISIS

 

In her message, Clinton appeared to outline an eight-point action plan, saying:

“…we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region.

 

…Qatar hosts the largest US Air Base in the region. And just last week, Qatar Airways announced plans to buy up to $18 billion in aircraft from US manufacturer Boeing.

PS

–>”our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure” MEANS COVER-UP, KEEP IT QUIET, AND DO NOTHING.

Where are the sanctions?

The threats of retaliation for support to ISIS/ISIL?

Aren’t we pretending to be “at war” with those groups?

Where are the prosecutions, the accusatIons of “war crimes” as were just levelled at Russia?

This is kabuki theater.

middle_east_graphic_2003

US Surveillance Flights A Step Toward Expanding War Into Syria

I remember discussing this absurdity with my wife a couple of years ago. They were helping the Syrian Jihadis, who had massacred thousands already. They are the US, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey and the rest of the NATO clowns. Probably Israel as well, but that might be trickier.

So they helped radical Jihadi terrorists inside Syria for three years.

The obvious endgame would be–to get what they really want–use the Jihadis they had helped as the cassus belli. Now they had to go fight the terrorism they created!

syrian2I doubted that could fly. It doesn’t pass the laugh test. It doesn’t align with the paradigms and myths even. It’s so flagrantly obvious, so ridiculous on its face, but here we are today. ISIS terrorists are sweeping across Asia, and now “we” can go bomb them, and ANYONE ELSE NEARBY “WE” DON’T LIKE.

As in the 1980 Afghan/Soviet Jihad, the US creates the monster, with a lot of money and a lot of help from its “friends.” Then it turns around, and screams: there are terrorists in the world!

Oh really? You mean the ones you were arming, training, funding and transporting around the region?  Oh yeah, them.

This sad formula assumes our population are drooling imbeciles.

Are they wrong?

ISIS was helped by US “partners,” and the US has aided their cause in Syria for years in the UN and with covert supplies, including weapons, and a training program in Jordan. The treasonous US puppet masters assume their Jihadi lieges are easily vanquished should the US decide to wage war on them. The Jihadis assume the US is so corrupt and stupid that it is helping the people who want to kill them.

 

USAID-JIHAD-XPRESS PROGRAM-halfsize

 

This goes beyond “policy” a banal word that masks reality. It is material support for terrorism. It is potentially treason. It is official US policy to help radical Jihadist “terrorists” in a bunch of nations today. Isn’t that supposed to be a problem?