Posts Tagged ‘mh-17’

57ebe015c46188a16b8b4658.jpg

 

Int’l investigators allowed Ukraine to fabricate MH17 evidence – Russia

“Instead of [working together], international investigators suspended Moscow from comprehensive participation in the investigative process, allowing our efforts only a minor role. It sounds like a bad joke, but at the same time they made Ukraine a full member of the JIT [Joint Investigation Team], giving it the opportunity to forge evidence and turn the case to its advantage,” Zakharova added.

 

Let’s look at some of the facts the official cover-up doesn’t want to talk about…

1. Ukraine (coup regime) air traffic directed the plane over a hot war zone, an aberration from previous flights.

2. The plane was shot at the front line of the conflict, emerging from the Ukraine (coup regime) territory to crash at a battlefield.

3. The Ukraine (coup regime) then shelled the crash site for weeks, not allowing anyone to inspect the wreckage.

4. Faked audio recordings, provided by the Ukraine coup regime, attempted to immediately blame the separatists, exposed, but the controversy never appears in western corporate media.

5. The Ukraine coup regime was given a secret deal allowing them to censor the investigation results  if the evidence points to their responsibility for the attack.

Farce.

 

BUK-MISSILE-SHRAPNELy

UPDATE: Video was a “live feed” from last night.

Another article and video are located here:

Dutch safety board, BUK missile-maker Almaz-Antey release reports on MH17 crash LIVE UPDATES
PS

More confirmation that the Dutch investigation is rigged:

12:29 GMT

The Dutch Safety Board will study the results of two experiments presented by BUK manufacturer Almaz-Antey.”

They didn’t agree to look at the missile manufacturer’s vast amount of data until TODAY, over a year after the incident. Previous attempts to submit data to the Dutch investigation were rebuffed. The Dutch are also trying to call today’s presentation a “final” report. How can it be “final” if they never looked at the actual arms manufacturer’s data and experiments?

Some actual tests:

PPS

Buk missile systems are part of the Ukrainian arsenal (for decades), a fact omitted in almost all western news coverage. There are several models and they have serial number which could identify the source. This has not been recovered.

The BUK-M1 air defense missile system is deployed with the armed forces of Ukraine and a number of other countries.

The “BUK” Ground Force Air Defense System

When the plane was shot down the Ukrainian armed forces attacked the site of the crash and kept investigators from approaching the evidence for several months. They repeatedly shelled the crash site, not exactly cooperative. It also shows that they were present in the area the whole time.

PPPS

Dutch presentation angry at Ukraine for using airspace over the war, but pushing incompetence rather than premeditation:

csm_mh17-einschu__sse_c43fcedbcc

In what is glaring and absurd to any objective observer, the Dutch have monkey wrenched the year and a half “investigation” of the Ukrainian shoot down.

Intl investigation failed to use Russian data’

On Tuesday, the Dutch Safety Board will release its final report on the fate of the crashed Malaysian Airlines MH17 flight. Ahead of the report’s publication we take a look at the key facts, theories and false trails surrounding the investigation.

Willy Wimmer, former Vice-President of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, joins RT

From the start it has appeared the Kiev junta had deliberately shot down the airliner in order to demonize their opponents, the Russian-backed separatists in the east, those who reject their violent coup of February 2014. Plenty of evidence suggests the coup regime deliberately cooked up this atrocity, and the most glaring piece of the puzzle is an apparent PSYOP, one which appears at the NY Times:

Kiev’s evidence of militia’s responsibility for airliner crash faked – expert

A detailed reading of what was “faked” sheds light on what actually happened. It also points at premeditation and cold blooded mass murder. The NY Times and western corporate press claim that these audio clips are:

“phone calls between rebels and Russian officers after the downing of Malaysia Airlines 17.
-NY Times

29906170001_3682489313001_video-still-for-video-3682467481001

In fact audio analysis shows that the calls were not about MH-17 at all, but were recorded the previous day concerning the downing of an SU-25 fighter plane some 60 miles away…

“At the same time, the name of the town of Yenakiyevo is clearly heard in the tape. However, the town is located about 100 km (60 miles) from the settlement of Snezhnoye where the Malaysian Boeing-777 airliner crashed.

Bezler said the talk had really taken place but the he had talked about a Ukrainian attack aircraft shot down by the militia above Yenakiyevo a day before the Malaysian airliner crash.”
-Pravda

So in the case of Pravda vs. the New York Times the American public is obviously going to (mindlessly) side with the US propaganda organ and completely ignore the actual evidence: the recordings exist and are up for anyone to analyze. The US “intelligence community” (sic) has been conspicuously silent about this psyop.

I have called it a PSYOP because it was obviously used to confuse the rebels and broadcast to them so that they would believe this fabricated recording concerned MH-17. Rebels in the field were then interviewed with what seem to be incriminating statements. The rebels themselves fell for the PYSOP. However, the recording was never true in the first place. It concerned a different shoot down of a different plane!

Add to this the memorandum of understanding that the Dutch have signed with the Ukrainian coup regime–that the Nazi junta has veto power over releasing the final report to the public–and we have very suspicious circumstances indeed.

Russia vetoes MH17 tribunal draft at UN Security Council

buk-missiles-300x225

Does anyone even remember the incident today?

364 days ago, I wrote:

PS: The Spy Satellite that Didn’t Bark

There’s an easy rebuttal to the Guardian’s Torez claims from unnamed so-called witnesses: the spy satellite photos.  Where are they? Why is the US hiding them?

If the US had pictures of these large lumbering vehicles, as claimed, they would be on the front page of every newspaper in the west. The propaganda is shown by what they won’t show as well as what they do claim.

Obama Should Release MH-17 Intel

MH 17 flight paths_0

Journalists’ Complicity in Hiding Those Guilty for MH17 Malaysian Airline Crash

1425472215246.cached

Shards of Truth in MH17 Investigation (But not at Daily Beast)

Doing what the Dutch investigation has so far declined to do – smear the separatists and Russia – the “Daily Beast” comes up with a belated hit piece, adding exactly nothing new, but taking the opportunity to repeat the US propaganda line…

‘How can you tell it’s a smear job,’ you ask?

The one link to any opposing ideas goes to a discredited piece of obvious disinformation, that infamous Photoshopped picture of an attacking plane. DB uses the smarmy jibe, “as some Russian media claimed,” to pretend they’ve actually looked at both sides of the debate. They have not and will not.

My response there won’t post, so I’m annoyed. Perhaps they have my email and/or IP address on their list as well. But their site won’t put it through, not in Chrome, Opera nor Microsoft Internet Explorer.

So here’s my fuck-you to the Daily Beast:

Propaganda laden bs. The Russian claims of a jet fighter are not because of that bit of photographic disinformation you link to. That was FUD.

The presence of a Ukraine jet fighter was seen by the eyewitnesses on the ground, who were, and are, CENSORED by the BBC (and here as well):

https://politicalfilm.wordpress.com/2014/10/21/censored-bbc-mh-17-eyewitnesses/

Further, two Russian radar monitoring stations tracked the fighter plane as it intercepted the jetliner:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KSpeo5RcQQo

The Russian organization of engineers finds the air to air — not surface to air — scenario more likely as no one saw or recorded any evidence of a BUK missile. The vapor trail lasts in the sky for up to 10 minutes and is visible for 40km.

https://politicalfilm.wordpress.com/2014/10/23/mh-17-the-untold-story/

They also tested the 30mm cannon of an SU-25 on planes and found similar damage to what is visible at the cockpit of the wreckage.

There’s more, too. The claim of a Buk missile seems to be a PSYOP prepared by the CIA aided Nazi coup regime in Kiev. It used voice recordings of a separatist commander from the previous day, when they actually did shoot down an attacking SU-25 over 60 miles from the location of the Malaysian incident. The audio was chopped up crudely and used to present the rebels as “guilty,” although I’m not sure if a mistaken incident in a war zone where the Ukraine air force regularly bombs and strafes civilians would be considered any kind of “crime.” The intentional shooting down and PSYOP to assign guilt however, by the Kiev government, is a different story.

Audio Psyop:

Kiev’s evidence of militia’s responsibility for airliner crash faked – expert
http://en.itar-tass.com/russia/741521

30mm-test3 30mm-tests 30mm-test

Russia tested the 30mm gun from the SU-25 on aircraft to compare the results to the cockpit of Malaysian Airlines MH-17. The results are in. That plane was most likely shot down by the Kiev jet fighter which the government of Ukraine has lied about being there. More witnesses are found.

What-the-media-won’t-report-about-Malaysia-Airlines-Flight-MH17

The previous Youtube clip was also censored. This version may also be taken down at any time. It shows eyewitnesses to the shoot down of the Malaysian airliner over Ukraine talking about a military jet in the same airspace as the airliner.

There has been no credible evidence that any separatist-controlled “Buk missile” shot down the plane, and this is simply the claim of the neo-nazi Kiev coup regime. Propaganda has substituted for hard facts.

Russia’s Union of Engineers put out a paper that the fighter jet brought down the airliner, and no hard evidence can dispute that assessment. In their view the Malaysian plane was attacked from a rising jet fighter, at the front. The fighter, possibly an SU-25, opened up with 30mm guns directly at the nose of the airliner killing the crew before they could radio for help or describe what was going on. After that initial attack, the Russians believe the fighter turned to follow MH-17 and fired air to air missiles to finish off the doomed aircraft.

RT reported on this BBC censorship:

Censorship or error? Internet criticism for BBC removal of MH17 report

The report on the Malaysian plane tragedy by BBC Russian correspondent Olga Ivshina was released on July 23. She interviewed local witnesses who told her that they saw military aircraft in the sky before the incident.

“And there was another aircraft, a military one, beside it [the Malaysian plane]. Everybody saw it,” said one witness.

“It was flying under it [the Malaysian plane], we could see it. It was going underneath the civilian one,” added another.

Russian radar data from two different monitoring stations also shows the fighter jet approach the passenger plane to within 3-5km:

Poroshenko, the oligarch in chief, blatantly lied about the presence of the Ukraine fighter jet. The Kiev regime continues to hide the Air Traffic Control communications.

But the nail in the coffin of the Nazi putsch regime is the altered course of the Malaysian jetliner. Ten previous flights had it avoiding the war zone flying south over the Sea of Azov. But for some unexplained reason, on this particular day — with censored Air Traffic Control tapes — the plane was ordered right over a hot war zone where a military transport plane was already shot down days before. This is THE most damning piece of evidence of all. Because no matter who actually shot it down, the Kiev regime is responsible for putting the plane there in harm’s way. They have full responsibility for creating the incident.

MH 17 flight paths_0