Posts Tagged ‘Noam Chomsky’

686_alhazmi_almihdhar_visas2050081722-8139

 

Noam Chomsky and his smug, empty-headed cheerleaders have been making waves this week, apparently a full-blown conspiracy-theorist now. This is after Chomsky fucked up the US left for fifty years, denying the realities of the JFK hit and 9/11 attack, which was clearly allowed to proceed despite mountains of warnings. Noam completely ignores that the CIA knew the purported hijackers were inside the country for over a year! Where there’s smoke there’s fire.

But Noam would have none of it. Indignation and apathy were his M.O.

All that was pre-Trump, however. The rule book has been burned. Yes, Noam a false flag attack is a possibility. Of course it is. It always was. But since you had no interest in all the evidence, why should anyone care what you have to say at all? Phantom future attacks? By whom?

The people who can perpetrate a false flag attack are in intelligence, not in Trump’s parade of incompetent clowns. The intelligence apparatus has been not-too-subtly at war with Trump for months, over his Russia policy. They want Russia steamrolled back to Moscow, even risking nuclear holocaust to get there. Trump, for whatever reasons, likely corrupt business relations, didn’t want to antagonize the world’s other big nuclear power. He is out of step with the NATO encroachment agenda, and the CIA and their neocon warlords hate him for it.

So, is Chomsky simply stating the obvious?

We always live under the threat of false flag terrorism. The CIA pioneered it since the 1950s. Rulers capitalize on it, and so they are (always) motivated to get away with murder and Treason. See Operation Gladio.

That reality never changed. Only Chomsky’s (apparent) awakening is different. Like a thought leader of drones, his new affinity for the concept of false flag terror permeates through the left gatekeepers this week, those usual suspects. Sort of validates my entire critique, huh, Noam?

You ready for that debate yet?

gRJozalTfySzfnQ-556x313-noPad

Noam Chomsky is a slippery character.

1. Chomsky just now admits, after five years of mass murder:

“[stopping weapons] to the monstrous ISIS, which has been getting support tacitly through Turkey, through—to the al-Nusra Front, which is hardly different, has just the—the al-Qaeda affiliate, technically broke from it, but actually the al-Qaeda affiliate, which is now planning its own—some sort of emirate, getting arms from our allies, Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

2. Previously he was spinning the situation differently.

What changed? Is he reading my pieces? Worried about his loss of credibility and his legacy?

(more…)

propaganda-media

…with Noam Chomsky, when he tells the truth.

Or with the Left media, when they tell the truth.

Or with the right, when they tell the truth.

Or with the corporate news, when they tell the truth.

The problem is that this is becoming rarer and rarer. The lies are out there, but one must be knowledgeable, well-versed in the tactics of professional propagandists, and able to counter them with reliable factual sources.

This blog was created, in part, as a clearinghouse to stuff all those sources into one place and recall them later. It is a library of reports that most news doesn’t want to cover, most people never hear about, and yet are often vital to understanding what’s really going on.

Use the search function, and you will be surprised. Guaranteed.

To get you started: Just Caught Noam Chomsky Lying About Syria

P.S.

Revelations by German editor of F.A.Z., Udo Ulfkotte, that he was on the CIA’s payroll inside the German media, for years.

“I’m fed up with this propaganda.”

He wrote a book about it too.

Yesterday America revealed that only “6%” had genuine trust in the media. Gullible fools that bunch.

blocked-by-alternet

 

They did NOT appreciate Fact-Free Luminaries: Chomsky’s Chumpskes. I wonder why not?

Maybe I’m doing something right?

Or maybe it was exposing Chomsky’s latest Syria lie that put them over the top?

Just Caught Noam Fibbin Again

Fact-Free Luminaries: Chomsky’s Chumpskies

Episode Four: Read This Article

CHOMSKY-1_web.jpg

A reporter asked Noam Chomsky about Vice President Joe Biden’s comments calling out US allies for aiding ISIS:

“Joe Biden… he accused the allies of conniving or helping ISIS; then he apologized.”

24:50

Chomsky immediately, like an obfuscation machine, takes the word “allied” and contorts the question to change the meaning:

Chomsky:

“He didn’t actually say they were allied with ISIS.”

What does this answer mean exactly? Do we need a team of lawyers to parse what the definition of “allied” is?

The question was US allies “conniving or helping ISIS,” which of courrse is what Biden said. Giving them massive amounts of lethal weapons–what Biden actually said:

“The Turks were great friends, and I’ve a great relationship with [Turkish President Recep Tayyip] Erdogan, … the Saudis, the Emiratis, etc. What were they doing? They were so determined to take down [Syrian President Bashar al-]Assad and essentially have a proxy Sunni-Shia war. What did they do?” Biden asked, according to a recording of the speech posted on the White House’s website. They poured hundreds of millions of dollars and tens of thousands of tons of weapons into anyone who would fight against Assad, except that the people who were being supplied were al-Nusra, and al Qaeda, and the extremist elements of jihadis coming from other parts of the world.

Chomsky says next:

“What he said was accurate. They leave the border open. They leave the opportunity for ISIS to strengthen itself.”

How does Noam Chomsky erase tens of thousands of tons of weapons” from reality with a few well-placed turns of phrase?

It’s not just Biden accusing the US allies of supporting ISIS, of course. Chomsky surely knows about other parties, such as the Defense Intelligence Agency and generals like Martin Dempsey.

Noam Chomsky is helping sell a fraud. You don’t gloss over tens of thousands of tons of weapons. He’s not senile. He doesn’t have Alzheimers. He has an agenda.

Why ISIS Exists: The Double Game

Banned.jpg

Coinciding with my banning from a big Noam Chomsky hagiography circle jerk group my account was “frozen” under a bogus pretext of my password allegedly being stolen. “Some features” are still locked right now.

I had to jump through quite a few hoops to get back on Facebook at all. Then I saw that the group had banished me to the mean, evil dissenter ranks. Impure thoughts cannot be tolerated, you know.

Last thing I can remember is giving them the heads-up on “Chomsky’s Chumpskies,” which will be the very next installment of my series. I lost a few good quotes, but there are plenty out there in the wild. I have a long history with these people.

In the meantime, would someone send this to Noam Chomsky and his clown posse?

Obama of Arabia

by Kristen Breitweiser

“No amount of money, no greed, no power, no regional interest could ever be worth such treason.”
-Kristen Breitweiser, Huffington Post

Not everyone has their head up their own ass over that official 9/11 cover-up.

chomsky-2013

I will continue the series. The next piece is already titled: Chomsky’s Chumpskies. This will quote the multitude of ignorant twats I come across, and show their own logical fallacies, indefensible ignorance, and inability to distinguish a factual public record from an alleged “theory.”

The effort may lead to an eventual book.

Chomsky should have taken the deal back in part one. Genie is out of the bottle now, Noam.

toxic-beef copy2

A Series by Joe Giambrone

Some may be following my ongoing challenge to Professor Noam Chomsky and his clearly misleading spin regarding the September 11th controversy. Or perhaps not, since none of the outlets which publish his every utterance, like clockwork, will dare publish criticism of the deified thought leader. No rebuttals may appear. My previous pieces established how Chomsky transforms matters of vital public interest, crimes, facts, glaring cover-ups of Congressional reports, into matters of his own personal opinion, which he dismisses and disregards to set an example for others.

My challenge is as much with the deception from Left so-called “alternative” media as it is with Chomsky personally. The demonstrable bias and deliberate misleading of readers (see below) motivates my pieces, such as this one. Many readers, whom I come across, are clearly misled, deluded, and yet proudly ignorant for some odd reason. More on that later, too.

How can an editor look himself in the mirror after being shown to be a serial liar? And a liar not on some trivial gibberish—this isn’t Kardashians—but on the “new American Century,” mass murder, and wars into the foreseeable future?

Media censorship has aided and abetted the perpetrators of the September 11th attacks after the fact. The solution to that editorial guilt is simple self-deception. Censor out the problem (evidence, logic), and so there is no problem; voilà.

Noam Chomsky helps to manufacture conformity. The Professor’s great expertise in media itself is problematic, as so-called “alternative” media looked to him personally for marching orders. It thus empowered Professor Chomsky to define the limits of permissible discourse post-September 11th of 2001.

Chomsky participates in the same Manufactured Consent he once seemed to oppose. The Left foundation-funded press is a different beast than corporate news media, which he and Edward S. Herman wrote about, but its uniformity and its unwillingness to correct itself when shown to be demonstrably wrong is dangerous and a massive institutional failure. The disinformation put out regularly by the Left “alternative” media brings real-world catastrophic implications. War propaganda, in its myriad forms, entails consequences.

Early in the 2000s, Noam Chomsky told the world to ignore the September 11th cover-up.

Result: The entire American Left turned off its critical faculties and let Deep State domestic terrorists get away with their “new Pearl Harbor” and their “Project for a New American Century.” Public opposition to them died out. We became a bi-partisan, unrestrained empire that wages unlimited war around the world with impunity. This is sold to the public every day in the name of “defense.” Never forget 9/11, and the bombing can commence on the next target.

(more…)

911

Joe Giambrone

In the wake of Donald Trump’s shocking pledge: “You will find out who really knocked down the World Trade Center,” many Americans may find themselves staring into the abyss. The implication has reached the mainstream, that we do not exactly know who was behind the September 11th attacks, which are trotted out to justify every policy enacted ever since.

“Because they have papers in there that are very secret,” continued Trump, “you may find it’s the Saudis, okay? But you will find out.”

It was genuinely a surprise that Trump would commit to uncovering the truth of the September 11th attacks, while the de facto leader of the American left, Professor Noam Chomsky of MIT, had long ago and repeatedly dismissed the 9/11 attacks as holding no importance whatsoever.

“Who cares?” was Noam Chomsky’s now infamous 2007 quote.

“I mean even if it [a September 11th government conspiracy] were true, which is extremely unlikely, who cares? I mean it doesn’t have any significance.”

In an email to Professor Chomsky I demanded he answer one very direct, albeit surprisingly controversial question. His non-response speaks volumes. My public debate challenge stands unanswered.

That vital question I posed to Chomsky, a cornerstone question for our age, concerns reality as we know it today (or as many do not). It is a “yes” or “no” proposition, and so without the opportunity for any fanciful verbal contortions.

Is there a US government cover-up of the facts of the September 11th attacks?
YES or NO?

You may want to ask Professor Chomsky this question yourself (chomsky@mit.edu). Don’t expect a response, although he may double down on “who cares?”

(more…)

0

 

The Shame of Noam Chomsky & left gatekeepers

 

“Bizarre non-sequiturs.”

 

chomsky-2013

 

A Public Challenge to Professor Noam Chomsky