Posts Tagged ‘Noam Chomsky’

686_alhazmi_almihdhar_visas2050081722-8139

 

Noam Chomsky and his smug, empty-headed cheerleaders have been making waves this week, apparently a full-blown conspiracy-theorist now. This is after Chomsky fucked up the US left for fifty years, denying the realities of the JFK hit and 9/11 attack, which was clearly allowed to proceed despite mountains of warnings. Noam completely ignores that the CIA knew the purported hijackers were inside the country for over a year! Where there’s smoke there’s fire.

But Noam would have none of it. Indignation and apathy were his M.O.

All that was pre-Trump, however. The rule book has been burned. Yes, Noam a false flag attack is a possibility. Of course it is. It always was. But since you had no interest in all the evidence, why should anyone care what you have to say at all? Phantom future attacks? By whom?

The people who can perpetrate a false flag attack are in intelligence, not in Trump’s parade of incompetent clowns. The intelligence apparatus has been not-too-subtly at war with Trump for months, over his Russia policy. They want Russia steamrolled back to Moscow, even risking nuclear holocaust to get there. Trump, for whatever reasons, likely corrupt business relations, didn’t want to antagonize the world’s other big nuclear power. He is out of step with the NATO encroachment agenda, and the CIA and their neocon warlords hate him for it.

So, is Chomsky simply stating the obvious?

We always live under the threat of false flag terrorism. The CIA pioneered it since the 1950s. Rulers capitalize on it, and so they are (always) motivated to get away with murder and Treason. See Operation Gladio.

That reality never changed. Only Chomsky’s (apparent) awakening is different. Like a thought leader of drones, his new affinity for the concept of false flag terror permeates through the left gatekeepers this week, those usual suspects. Sort of validates my entire critique, huh, Noam?

You ready for that debate yet?

gRJozalTfySzfnQ-556x313-noPad

Noam Chomsky is a slippery character.

1. Chomsky just now admits, after five years of mass murder:

“[stopping weapons] to the monstrous ISIS, which has been getting support tacitly through Turkey, through—to the al-Nusra Front, which is hardly different, has just the—the al-Qaeda affiliate, technically broke from it, but actually the al-Qaeda affiliate, which is now planning its own—some sort of emirate, getting arms from our allies, Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

2. Previously he was spinning the situation differently.

What changed? Is he reading my pieces? Worried about his loss of credibility and his legacy?

(more…)

propaganda-media

…with Noam Chomsky, when he tells the truth.

Or with the Left media, when they tell the truth.

Or with the right, when they tell the truth.

Or with the corporate news, when they tell the truth.

The problem is that this is becoming rarer and rarer. The lies are out there, but one must be knowledgeable, well-versed in the tactics of professional propagandists, and able to counter them with reliable factual sources.

This blog was created, in part, as a clearinghouse to stuff all those sources into one place and recall them later. It is a library of reports that most news doesn’t want to cover, most people never hear about, and yet are often vital to understanding what’s really going on.

Use the search function, and you will be surprised. Guaranteed.

To get you started: Just Caught Noam Chomsky Lying About Syria

P.S.

Revelations by German editor of F.A.Z., Udo Ulfkotte, that he was on the CIA’s payroll inside the German media, for years.

“I’m fed up with this propaganda.”

He wrote a book about it too.

Yesterday America revealed that only “6%” had genuine trust in the media. Gullible fools that bunch.

blocked-by-alternet

 

They did NOT appreciate Fact-Free Luminaries: Chomsky’s Chumpskes. I wonder why not?

Maybe I’m doing something right?

Or maybe it was exposing Chomsky’s latest Syria lie that put them over the top?

Just Caught Noam Fibbin Again

Fact-Free Luminaries: Chomsky’s Chumpskies

Episode Four: Read This Article

CHOMSKY-1_web.jpg

A reporter asked Noam Chomsky about Vice President Joe Biden’s comments calling out US allies for aiding ISIS:

“Joe Biden… he accused the allies of conniving or helping ISIS; then he apologized.”

24:50

Chomsky immediately, like an obfuscation machine, takes the word “allied” and contorts the question to change the meaning:

Chomsky:

“He didn’t actually say they were allied with ISIS.”

What does this answer mean exactly? Do we need a team of lawyers to parse what the definition of “allied” is?

The question was US allies “conniving or helping ISIS,” which of courrse is what Biden said. Giving them massive amounts of lethal weapons–what Biden actually said:

“The Turks were great friends, and I’ve a great relationship with [Turkish President Recep Tayyip] Erdogan, … the Saudis, the Emiratis, etc. What were they doing? They were so determined to take down [Syrian President Bashar al-]Assad and essentially have a proxy Sunni-Shia war. What did they do?” Biden asked, according to a recording of the speech posted on the White House’s website. They poured hundreds of millions of dollars and tens of thousands of tons of weapons into anyone who would fight against Assad, except that the people who were being supplied were al-Nusra, and al Qaeda, and the extremist elements of jihadis coming from other parts of the world.

Chomsky says next:

“What he said was accurate. They leave the border open. They leave the opportunity for ISIS to strengthen itself.”

How does Noam Chomsky erase tens of thousands of tons of weapons” from reality with a few well-placed turns of phrase?

It’s not just Biden accusing the US allies of supporting ISIS, of course. Chomsky surely knows about other parties, such as the Defense Intelligence Agency and generals like Martin Dempsey.

Noam Chomsky is helping sell a fraud. You don’t gloss over tens of thousands of tons of weapons. He’s not senile. He doesn’t have Alzheimers. He has an agenda.

Why ISIS Exists: The Double Game

Banned.jpg

Coinciding with my banning from a big Noam Chomsky hagiography circle jerk group my account was “frozen” under a bogus pretext of my password allegedly being stolen. “Some features” are still locked right now.

I had to jump through quite a few hoops to get back on Facebook at all. Then I saw that the group had banished me to the mean, evil dissenter ranks. Impure thoughts cannot be tolerated, you know.

Last thing I can remember is giving them the heads-up on “Chomsky’s Chumpskies,” which will be the very next installment of my series. I lost a few good quotes, but there are plenty out there in the wild. I have a long history with these people.

In the meantime, would someone send this to Noam Chomsky and his clown posse?

Obama of Arabia

by Kristen Breitweiser

“No amount of money, no greed, no power, no regional interest could ever be worth such treason.”
-Kristen Breitweiser, Huffington Post

Not everyone has their head up their own ass over that official 9/11 cover-up.