Posts Tagged ‘Noam Chomsky’

chomsky-2013

I will continue the series. The next piece is already titled: Chomsky’s Chumpskies. This will quote the multitude of ignorant twats I come across, and show their own logical fallacies, indefensible ignorance, and inability to distinguish a factual public record from an alleged “theory.”

The effort may lead to an eventual book.

Chomsky should have taken the deal back in part one. Genie is out of the bottle now, Noam.

toxic-beef copy2

A Series by Joe Giambrone

Some may be following my ongoing challenge to Professor Noam Chomsky and his clearly misleading spin regarding the September 11th controversy. Or perhaps not, since none of the outlets which publish his every utterance, like clockwork, will dare publish criticism of the deified thought leader. No rebuttals may appear. My previous pieces established how Chomsky transforms matters of vital public interest, crimes, facts, glaring cover-ups of Congressional reports, into matters of his own personal opinion, which he dismisses and disregards to set an example for others.

My challenge is as much with the deception from Left so-called “alternative” media as it is with Chomsky personally. The demonstrable bias and deliberate misleading of readers (see below) motivates my pieces, such as this one. Many readers, whom I come across, are clearly misled, deluded, and yet proudly ignorant for some odd reason. More on that later, too.

How can an editor look himself in the mirror after being shown to be a serial liar? And a liar not on some trivial gibberish—this isn’t Kardashians—but on the “new American Century,” mass murder, and wars into the foreseeable future?

Media censorship has aided and abetted the perpetrators of the September 11th attacks after the fact. The solution to that editorial guilt is simple self-deception. Censor out the problem (evidence, logic), and so there is no problem; voilà.

Noam Chomsky helps to manufacture conformity. The Professor’s great expertise in media itself is problematic, as so-called “alternative” media looked to him personally for marching orders. It thus empowered Professor Chomsky to define the limits of permissible discourse post-September 11th of 2001.

Chomsky participates in the same Manufactured Consent he once seemed to oppose. The Left foundation-funded press is a different beast than corporate news media, which he and Edward S. Herman wrote about, but its uniformity and its unwillingness to correct itself when shown to be demonstrably wrong is dangerous and a massive institutional failure. The disinformation put out regularly by the Left “alternative” media brings real-world catastrophic implications. War propaganda, in its myriad forms, entails consequences.

Early in the 2000s, Noam Chomsky told the world to ignore the September 11th cover-up.

Result: The entire American Left turned off its critical faculties and let Deep State domestic terrorists get away with their “new Pearl Harbor” and their “Project for a New American Century.” Public opposition to them died out. We became a bi-partisan, unrestrained empire that wages unlimited war around the world with impunity. This is sold to the public every day in the name of “defense.” Never forget 9/11, and the bombing can commence on the next target.

(more…)

911

Joe Giambrone

In the wake of Donald Trump’s shocking pledge: “You will find out who really knocked down the World Trade Center,” many Americans may find themselves staring into the abyss. The implication has reached the mainstream, that we do not exactly know who was behind the September 11th attacks, which are trotted out to justify every policy enacted ever since.

“Because they have papers in there that are very secret,” continued Trump, “you may find it’s the Saudis, okay? But you will find out.”

It was genuinely a surprise that Trump would commit to uncovering the truth of the September 11th attacks, while the de facto leader of the American left, Professor Noam Chomsky of MIT, had long ago and repeatedly dismissed the 9/11 attacks as holding no importance whatsoever.

“Who cares?” was Noam Chomsky’s now infamous 2007 quote.

“I mean even if it [a September 11th government conspiracy] were true, which is extremely unlikely, who cares? I mean it doesn’t have any significance.”

In an email to Professor Chomsky I demanded he answer one very direct, albeit surprisingly controversial question. His non-response speaks volumes. My public debate challenge stands unanswered.

That vital question I posed to Chomsky, a cornerstone question for our age, concerns reality as we know it today (or as many do not). It is a “yes” or “no” proposition, and so without the opportunity for any fanciful verbal contortions.

Is there a US government cover-up of the facts of the September 11th attacks?
YES or NO?

You may want to ask Professor Chomsky this question yourself (chomsky@mit.edu). Don’t expect a response, although he may double down on “who cares?”

(more…)

0

 

The Shame of Noam Chomsky & left gatekeepers

 

“Bizarre non-sequiturs.”

 

chomsky-2013

 

A Public Challenge to Professor Noam Chomsky

 

 

Radio-mic-image-ON-AIR1-663x389.jpg

 

Kevin Barrett interviewed me for his radio program concerning the Noam Chomsky 9/11 Challenge. It should show up there after he’s done tinkering with it:

Kevin Barrett’s radio show schedule

 

It was fun actually airing my grievances concerning the distorted media environment here in the US, including the “left” media that treats certain voices with kid gloves and doesn’t challenge their statements. Have you ever seen a critique of Noam Chomsky published in any outlet that publishes his articles and interviews?

Ever?

 

 

chomsky

Noam Chomsky and the Willful Ignorance of 9/11

This is similar to my own response to Chomsky’s ongoing deception.

I’ll add one more point concerning Chomsky’s gibberish that neither Ryan nor myself included previously.  Noam Chomsky’s so-called “evidence” is that “they [the Bush White House] blamed it  [9/11] on their allies” the Saudis.  Not true.  Not true in the slightest.

The evidence suggests Saudi state complicity.  However, the “blame” is nowhere to be seen, and this evidence is covered up to this day.  Two administrations have glaringly failed to blame the Saudis for assisting the 9/11 hijackers inside the United States.  Noam Chomsky’s mischaracterization of what happened is more deliberate deception.

This man does not deserve your trust, people.  He repeatedly makes idiotic statements on this issue, when on many other issues he is quite serious and studied.  The glaring disparity between what Chomsky will say here vs. what he says on other safer topics, topics that don’t involve high treason by US government officials and the CIA, should be a red flag to YOU.

There are many whistleblowers who have told us of the cover-up of the September 11th attacks by the US government.  Noam Chomsky knows this.  He doesn’t care.  His verbal contortions are deliberate, deceptive and propagandistic.  I may do a much longer study of Noam Chomsky’s lies about the September 11th attacks, to date.