“Ukrainian military’s complicated relationship with Nazi imagery” -NY Times (spin)

1. FUCK NAZIS
2. FUCK NAZI SYMPATHIZERS
3. FUCK NAZI COLLABORATORS
4. IMPEACH BIDEN NOW

NY Times Selling Naziism to Amerika

NY Times “reporters” ask Ukrainian Nazis to hide their Nazi patches for photographs. That is pure propaganda.

More:

Journalists Are Asking Ukrainian Soldiers To Hide Their Nazi Patches, NYT Admits

NY Times Lies About Nordstream Bombing

Ukraine Shells Nuclear Plant Controlled by Russia–US Media Blames Russia

NYT: "Ukraine accused Russian forces on Sunday of firing rockets that landed on the grounds of a nuclear power plant that Russia has seized."

So Ukraine is accusing Russia of firing at a nuclear power plant that Russia is occupying? https://t.co/mwtorkFYdI pic.twitter.com/83NVwS7Clv

— Aaron Maté (@aaronjmate) August 8, 2022

This Ukraine regime is the most dangerous fascist organization we’ve seen in our lifetimes.

US media continues to lie for this Nazi-infested abomination.

Following a coordinated freakout by the Ukraine lobby, CBS self-censors a report stating the obvious. Amnesty International has also issued a bizarre half-apology for issuing a single report (out of 40+) on well-documented abuses of civilians by the Ukrainian army. https://t.co/a0WInfAk6Y

— Max Blumenthal (@MaxBlumenthal) August 8, 2022

P.S.

Everyone Who Doesn’t Work For Us is Alex Jones

CIA Lie Exposed: Hunter Biden’s Laptop

50 CIA clowns backed the LIE!!!

Dore vs. “Russia Bounty” Lies

 

 

PS.

John Cusack’s ass gets reamed at the end. Magnificent.

Bountygate Disinformation Post-Mortem

Complete bullshit war propaganda exposed, but it still succeeded in preventing an end to the Afghan war.

 

How the Pentagon failed to sell Afghan government’s bunk ‘Bountygate’ story to US intelligence agencies 

 

The New Unreality: Evidence-Free Claims From Nameless Spies

In ‘Russian Bounty’ Story, Evidence-Free Claims From Nameless Spies Became Fact Overnight

NY Times / CIA Big Lie: Russia Paying Afghans

 

“To date, DOD has no corroborating evidence to validate the recent allegations found in open-source reports.”

Big surprise…

Pentagon says ‘no corroborating evidence’ of Russian bounties on US troops as media claims increase

Chem Weapons Fraud, Censorship Even at DemocracyNow (sic)

 

 

What Aaron Mate doesn’t talk about is that ALL the gas attacks have been fraudulent. He has this one story to repeatedly bang the drum on, but he hasn’t studied the entire war.

Seven years ago, 2013:

 

UN Inspector Carla del Ponte exposes that the rebels are using gas and blaming it on the Syrian government. UN IGNORES her findings and lies about it. Mate never even noticed.

DOUBTS ABOUT WHO IS USING CHEMICAL WEAPONS IN SYRIA

Syria: The First Casualty

Why ISIS Exists

 

 

CNN’s Jake Tapper Calls Bullshit on New Russia Conspiracy Theory!

Jake Tapper/CNN disputes the new Russia hysteria? There’s no there-there! There’s nothing, just an opinion that the Russians don’t dislike Trump, and so that means a grand conspiracy according to the NY Times without a single shred of evidence.

It’s McCarthyism. Anyone who disagrees with the new Cold War must be a Russian. You’re a Russian. Your mom is a Russian.

Never thought I’d see the day. I guess Tapper’s tired of looking like a moron…

 

A national security official I know and trust pushes back on the way the briefing/ODNI story is being told, and others with firsthand knowledge agree with his assessment.

Thread/

— Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) February 21, 2020

2/ "What's been articulated in the news is that the intelligence community has concluded that the Russians are trying to help Trump again. But the intelligence doesn't say that,” the official says…

— Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) February 21, 2020

3/ “The problem is Shelby" — Pierson, the elections threats executive in the intelligence community — "said they developed a preference for Trump. A more reasonable interpretation of the intelligence is not that they have a preference, it's a step short of that….

— Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) February 21, 2020

4/ “It's more that they understand the president is someone they can work with, he's a dealmaker. But not that they prefer him over Sanders or Buttigieg or anyone else. So it may have been mischaracterized by Shelby" at the House Intel briefing last week…

— Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) February 21, 2020