Posts Tagged ‘Obama’

140924-isis-islamic-state-mn-1525_f8a0c1e479a54a71c5664ba320232239

This author seems to think so:

Bernie Suarez:

Unlimited War! ISIS Psyop Theater Comes to Full Fruition

Even when it was revealed that throughout Iraq, “suspicions” were running deep back in September of 2014 that “CIA and Islamic State are united“, no one within the mainstream media did anything to stop the ISIS psyop by at least exposing the fact that not one ISIS supply line had been disrupted, not one bank account ceased, not one (illegal) NSA data mining effort able to collect the whereabouts of ISIS (as they do of U.S. innocent citizens) to gather them up and end the ISIS theater. Not one story was reported by mainstream media about the 100+ ISIS supply trucks rumbling through Turkey to get into Syria. Not one story appeared about how Turkey was supporting ISIS or about how the U.S. and its NATO allies were allowing ISIS to enjoy (food, water, toiletries and ammo) supplies without disruption.

dead-daughter_Donetsk_banner

Ignorant Americans don’t seem to understand what happened in Ukraine, at all. The USA bankrolled neo-nazis, who illegally seized power last February. They then pretended these thugs were “duly elected” in Obama’s own words. Their CIA helped the Svoboda Nazis in control of the Ukraine military launch massive attacks on the people of the east, who refused to recognize the illegitimate coup regime. The eastern provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk voted for autonomy, and that they wouldn’t take orders from Kiev any longer. This was labelled “terrorism” by the Nazi coup regime, which has bombed, burned and shot thousands of people in the two breakaway provinces.

Obama threatens to send more arms to the Nazis if Russia doesn’t convince the eastern Ukrainians to surrender. World War 3, a possible NUCLEAR confrontation that could end life on earth, hangs in the balance. America supports murderous, illegitimate, genocidal Nazis and yet pretends to want peace.

Obama calls Putin before Minsk talks to discuss E. Ukraine peace deal – White House

President Obama underscored the rising human toll of the fighting and underscored the importance of President Putin seizing the opportunity presented by the ongoing discussions between Russia, France, Germany, and Ukraine to reach a peaceful resolution,” the White House said.

Nytimes_hq

“White House officials say the administration has undertaken a review on whether to release the [28 redacted] pages but has no timetable for when they might be made public.” -NY Times

A convincing case can be made that Barack Obama decided to protect the Saudi sponsors of the September 11th attacks as soon as he won the presidency in 2008:

Justice Dept. Backs Saudi Royal Family on 9/11 Lawsuit

Obama literally had his “Justice” (sic) Department aid and abet the Saudi terror financiers and stood against the American victims of the 9/11 attacks. Obama sided with Saudi terrorists over US victims of 9/11, in one of the most shameful displays in the history of this country, something I will “never forget,” nor forgive. Obama betrayed America, as proven beyond any shadow of a doubt in the above link from May 29, 2009. But many, many people also betrayed America. The president is not alone there.

Today’s Times:

“[Senator Bob] Graham has repeatedly said it shows that Saudi Arabia was complicit in the Sept. 11 attacks. “The 28 pages primarily relate to who financed 9/11, and they point a very strong finger at Saudi Arabia as being the principal financier,” Mr. Graham said last month as he pressed for the pages to be made public.

NY Times, of course, allows Zelikow to LIE:

“Philip D. Zelikow, the executive director of the national commission that investigated the Sept. 11 attacks after the congressional panels, said the commission followed up on the allegations, using some of the same personnel who wrote them initially, but reached a different conclusion.”

Far from following up Zelikow FIRED a Commission staffer for simply getting a copy of the 28 pages and reading it. Where’s that part of the story, NY Times?

History Commons:

Two investigators on the 9/11 Commission, Mike Jacobson and Dana Leseman, compile a list of interviews they want to do to investigate leads indicating that two of the 9/11 hijackers, Khalid Almihdhar and Nawaf Alhazmi, were linked to elements of the Saudi government. The list is submitted to Philip Zelikow, the commission’s executive director, for approval. However, a few days later Zelikow replies that the twenty interviews requested is too much, and they can only do half the interviews. Leseman, a former Justice Department lawyer, is unhappy with this, as it is traditional to demand the widest range of documents and interviews early on, so that reductions can be made later in negotiations if need be.
‘We Need the Interviews’ – Leseman tells Zelikow that his decision is “very arbitrary” and “crazy,” adding: “Philip, this is ridiculous. We need the interviews. We need these documents. Why are you trying to limit our investigation?” Zelikow says that he does not want to overwhelm federal agencies with document and interview requests at an early stage of the investigation, but, according to author Philip Shenon, after this, “Zelikow was done explaining. He was not in the business of negotiating with staff who worked for him.”
More Conflicts – This is the first of several conflicts between Zelikow and Leseman, who, together with Jacobson, had been on the staff of the 9/11 Congressional Inquiry and had researched this issue there. Shenon will write: “Leseman was that rare thing on the commission: She was not afraid of Zelikow; she would not be intimidated by him. In fact, from the moment she arrived at the commission’s offices on K Street, she seemed to almost relish the daily combat with Zelikow, even if she wondered aloud to her colleagues why there had to be any combat at all.” [SHENON, 2008, PP. 109-111]
Later Fired, Evidence Deleted from Final Report – Zelikow will later fire Leseman from the commission for mishandling classified information (see April 2003and (April 2003)) and will have the evidence of the Saudi connection gathered by Jacobson and Leseman’s successor, Raj De, deleted from the main text of the commission’s report (see June 2004).

John-Kiriakou-article-display-b

The one CIA officer with integrity — of course he’s in prison now.

“And I would like to know why those officers aren’t being prosecuted when clearly they’ve committed crimes and those crimes were well documented by both the CIA and the Senate Committee of Intelligence.”
-John Kiriakou

PRISON DISPATCHES FROM THE WAR ON TERROR: EX-CIA OFFICER JOHN KIRIAKOU SPEAKS

snowden.si

Snowden documentary ‘Citizenfour’ nominated for Oscar

We also need to talk about who’s actually breaking the law…

Barack Obama lies to entire nation on television:

obamarosensa-screen

“I can say unequivocally … if you are a U.S. person the NSA cannot listen to your telephone calls and the NSA cannot target your emails.”

-Barack Hussein Obama, June 17, 2013, Charlie Rose

James Clapper blatantly lies to Congress, with no accountability or prosecution:

James_R._Clapper

Senator Ron Wyden, “Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?” Clapper’s response was simple, “No, sir, not wittingly.”

The revelations of Edward Snowden have shown Clapper to be guilty of perjury.”

BUSTED

we the people

The Feds granted themselves the right to put up phony cell phone towers to steal your data at will. Have audacity to claim it’s legal. The 4th Amendment dies.

Feds’ position on decoy cell-site towers continues anti-privacy theme.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is taking the position that court warrants are not required when deploying cell-site simulators in public places. Nicknamed “stingrays,” the devices are decoy cell towers that capture locations and identities of mobile phone users and can intercept calls and texts.

4TH AMENDMENT

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,[a] against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

s_500_opednews_com_0_donbass-jpg_500873_20141231-421

“Rapprochement with Russia?”

One might reasonably guess that this insulting plan is a preliminary warning of things to come. My guess is that the US and Ukraine are about to launch a bloodier war.