Posts Tagged ‘opporession’

Democrat hypocrisy is beyond imagining.

In the one breath they attack multiple countries for unproven, alleged (CIA conspiracy theory) “human rights violations,” while at the same time they openly give Israel a free pass for human rights crimes.

Everything every ignorant Westerner who funds Israel though taxes needs to know about reality on the ground:




The more things change…



“Against individualism, the Fascist conception is for the State; and it is for the individual in so far as he coincides with the State . . . . It is opposed to classical Liberalism . . . . Liberalism denied the State in the interests of the particular individual; Fascism reaffirms the State as the true reality of the individual.”
–Mussolini, The Doctrine of Fascism

Apple, Google Both Hosting Saudi Government App That Lets Men Track Women, Restrict Their Travel

“allows for male Saudis “to specify when and how women can cross Saudi borders, and to get close to real-time SMS updates when they travel.” Absher can be used to restrict which destinations Saudi women can travel to, as well as prevent them from traveling anywhere outside the country at all, and the SMS notification system is used to alert the men if the women try to leave on their own.”


When the Government Views Its Own Population as the Enemy

What I’ve been saying for years…

But few commentators draw another, more subversive conclusion: government has no interest in protecting its citizens (as such) in the first place. In fact, its interest is precisely the opposite: to expose its citizens–with privileged exceptions–to harm.

…it is in the interest of government and the top “1%” in income/wealth for civilians periodically to be victims of terrorism. If the terrorist threat disappears, so does the useful pretext.

American Frankenstate

“They will be loyal ideology buyers when they grow up.”

-Aldous Huxley

Meet some of the monsters down your street…


I mean,



I avoided this based on initial negative reviews.  Some cinematographers, however, praised it to the moon.  Myopia?  Does image trump the story and execution?  Or is there something here worth exploring?

Later I found that it was directed by Tom Tykwer, and I simply had to see it for myself.  Tykwer has been legendarily great with Run Lola Run, The Princess and the Warrior and Perfume.

After the opening two minutes however, I had to pause it and write this:

If the first minutes of Cloud Atlas were posted online I would not have bothered (the opposite of Serenity, btw, where that did happen, and I did run out to see it as a result).  It’s a disjointed and overly confusing beginning with simply too many characters, times and stories all irrelevant to one another.  This is like a mishmash of incomprehensible proportions, right off the bat.  The intense focus and single minded drive of a film like Run Lola Run is traded for apparently compressing half a dozen different book chapters into mere seconds of jigsaw cinema.  How can anyone be brought into the story, when they can’t even comprehend which story or time period they are supposed to be entering?  This is a major flaw and miscue in the storytelling that no one would expect from Tykwer.  The Cloud Atlas novel has been described as “unfilmable” which may not be true – but then again, not like this.  Establish something, for fuck’s sake, before you jump all over the universe.

By 20 or 30 minutes in, it’s obvious that these stories really don’t belong in the same film at all.  Some later tenuous nanofibres pretending to connect them are simply not going to do it.  These stories simply don’t intertwine, and their relation to each other isn’t really going to pay off satisfactorily (assuming any such relationship eventually is revealed).  Some of the actors jump from life to life and time to time, but so what?  This calls attention to the weakness of the connections more than it makes them.  It seems to say that we have Tom Hanks, and he costs X dollars, so let’s make sure he’s in 1760 and 1920 and 1973 and 2294 or whatever.  The specifics are as unimportant as the existence of the various unrelated snippets.  Any of the individual stories may have worked on their own terms, but what the hell are they all doing in the same movie?  It’s like the author/screenwriter jumped from cable tv channel to channel and wished and prayed that he could somehow tie all the video clips together by throwing the same actors in each channel’s story.  It really does play that disjointed.

A similar film which springs to mind immediately, due to its similar malady, is Magnolia.  Described by my wife as, “the emperor has no clothes,” the problem with Magnolia is that it’s not really a movie, it’s just cut that length.  Magnolia knitted together a bunch of unrelated snippets, probably from a bunch of shorter works, none of them suitable for a feature-length story.  This creative (pretentious) dering-do fell flat on its face in some quarters.  There’s suspension of disbelief, and then there’s the suspension of eye-rolling and the desire to hurl your Slushee at the screen.  I think of Cloud Atlas in that category, that genre of chopped together short stories that really don’t have any connection to one another, but if we preen and pretend we’re artists above all that maybe they’ll give us an Oscar™.

Conversely, Robert Altman’s Short Cuts worked for some reason.  Don’t even ask me why.  I guess the idea was broadcast right in the title, up front and blatant.  Everything happened in the same general locale (Los Angeles) in the same time period.  What’s more I expected them to link the stories together, with characters from one milieu crossing into other circles during the progression of the film.  Short Cuts pulled off what it set out to do without jumping three centuries backward or forward.  Perhaps Tykwer meditated more on Aronofsky’s The Fountain, another multiple period story, and another one that worked because it wasn’t so disjointed that there was no hope of tying them together in the end.  Perhaps The Fountain is the model, the one that went out farthest on a limb without that limb breaking.  In The Fountain storytelling may have achieved new possibilities that people hadn’t believed possible before, including Tykwer.

But here?  In Cloud Atlas it can’t tie these characters, plotlines or events together in any way shape or form for the first half of the picture.  I can’t even count the number of different lives we’re supposed to be remembering.  The audience, who needs you to throw them some kind of bone, just can’t hang on in such a desolate environment.  Personally, he lost me before the title screen came up.  Tykwer’s just outsmarting the audience and outsmarting himself.  And I still believe he’s one of the greats, but he needs better, more filmable material.

So after endless jumping through time, one guy is poisoning another guy; why?  Who knows.  Maybe about a girl and jealousy.  One guy is leading a super techno race chick to a mountaintop through cannibal country and fighting the urge to kill her.  One guy is on a ship with a stowawayy slave.  One synthetic android Chinese chick has escaped future sex-slave In ‘N Out Burger to join the revolution. One super gay music composer shot some dude who wants him captured, although he’s writing the great timeless Cloud Opera symphony, from the first guy’s dream, and oh yeah he already kills himself in a bathtub in the opening minute – huh?  The film is a giant huh, with some loosely strung together themes about freedom and people dominating others.  But, it’s Tron / Speed Racer one moment, and on a sailing ship in the 18th century the next.  It’s got everything and kitchen sinks from the past, future and beyond.  I forgot to mention the Big Oil wants to blow up a nuclear reactor assassin subplot.  Yeah, it’s that movie, that you were clamoring for Hollywood to finally make, right?

Okay, I’m feeling sarcastic.  But, who in the fuck thought stringing all these stories together in one movie was a good idea?

After an hour some of the themes start to look similar.  But the worlds look nothing like one another.  The plots of each story are also wildly disparate.  Time separates them, but there are so many characters in so many times and worlds that it’s hard to figure out who may have a tenuous future connection to whom, based upon some of the clues that may be clues, or they may be background because there’s so much going on in so many subplots, who the hell can remember?

I actually like some of the themes and ideas the film tries to bring out.  My problem is with the execution, and the shoehorning of all these plots.  They just don’t fit together.

There’s another plot with an old wacky publisher guy chased by thugs who is locked in an old folks home by his pissed-off brother.  But, who can keep track of this overturned pot of spaghetti?  The jagged cutting, often to clips lasting no more than a few seconds from any one story, is reminiscent of a child playing with the TV remote.  This makes it all but impossible to care, or invest emotionally in any of the characters or horrors portrayed, leaving them as nothing more than curiosities in a passing kind of noise that echoes from many different lives.

That’s Cloud Atlas.

Movie, the Movie made more sense.

Revolution Begins: Hunger Games II


You know I’m going to be there.  This looks better than the first one, and the stakes are getting larger.  Here are the articles we posted concerning The Hunger Games:



Heather Duke – Heather McNamara – Heather Chandler – Veronica Sawyer

by Joe Giambrone

Some films make a bold frontal assault on society, and Heathers is clearly one of them.  As J.D. (Christian Slater) makes his final pitch in favor of blowing up the school with everyone inside of it, he remarks, “People will look at the ashes of Westerburg and say, ‘Now there’s a school that self-destructed, not because society didn’t care, but because the school was society!’”

Such is the backdrop to the story of clashing social types as represented through an Ohio high school population in the 80’s.  Characters stand in for various mindsets and views in conflict.  The teenagers vie for popularity, fame and fortune.  Selfish ends are weighed against the school as a whole, and peoples’ inherent worths are ranked according to criteria such as if they were cheerleaders or not.  The theme deals with self-destruction and suicide, and the tendency for self-interested myopic individuals to create a hostile atmosphere, to profit at the expense of the weak or less popular.

Veronica Sawyer (Winona Ryder) is the character torn between both worlds, the popular clique vs. the humble dweebs who languish in obscurity.  Although she isn’t one of the infamous Heathers, Veronica is allowed into their group by the decree of the head Heather, the uber-bitchy blonde bombshell Heather Chandler (Kim Walker).

With Heather Chandler’s coaching, Veronica has abandoned her childhood friends in favor of going off to college fraternity parties and being at the center of the school’s malicious activities.

Then the bodies start piling up.  When Veronica falls in with J.D., her partner in crime, people start dying.  By hiding the murders and presenting the scenes as suicides, the two young outlaws try to justify their actions vis a vis improving the school – improving the world by eliminating vile people.  This is, of course, the provocative and highly charged center of the film.  Veronica is torn between the reality of horrible people getting away with running the school for their own benefits, versus a self-styled revolution of destroying them covertly with J.D.’s dirty tricks.

Sucked deeper into the machinations of J.D., who has access to demolition explosives, Veronica finally realizes that her heart has led her head astray.  Vowing to turn the situation around, her stance is heroic vs. J.D.’s self-destructive psychosis.

Lines from Veronica suggest a middle ground, a law and order style solution to the problem of social conflict.  She appoints herself the “new sheriff” in a bid to take Heather Duke (Shannen Doherty) back down a notch, and to lift up Martha Dunnstock who had been led astray during the course of events.  Veronica’s character suggests a political compromise to the strife.  Heathers is a black comedy with socio-political implications in the vein of God Bless America and Idiocracy.

Heathers on Netflix.

Apparently not angry enough to kick all the corrupt bums out and champion third parties. Even as “Homeland Security” purchases 750,000,000 rounds of hollow point ammunition (where will it be pointed?), Americans keep acceding to the same set of corrupt scumbags who got us here in the first place. Pretty monumentally pathetic, actually. Land of the Formerly Free, Home of the Pathetic.