Posts Tagged ‘opposition research’

trump-russian-pee-tape-threat-level-raised-to-code-yellow

 

In the wake of Trump saying he’d like foreign dirt on opponents (again), the Democratic brainwashed Tweeter Brigade is out vomiting all over the net.

But they never had a problem with a UK SPY working for their candidate. A spy. From the UK, and most certainly not an American. This was a foreigner meddling in the election. They spin it away with the “special” status of Britain, them being friends and such, what hypocritical nonsense.

But even when that UK spy was exposed for using RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT SOURCES, they still have a remarkable capacity for not seeing a problem there. The hypocrisy meter is broken beyond repair.

Clinton & DNC lied and covered this up for about a year during election season:

Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier

How good were these sources? Consider what Steele would write in the memos he filed with Simpson: Source A—to use the careful nomenclature of his dossier—was “a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure.” Source B was “a former top level intelligence officer still active in the Kremlin.”

HOW EX-SPY CHRISTOPHER STEELE COMPILED HIS EXPLOSIVE TRUMP-RUSSIA DOSSIER

 

So, good luck talking facts and logic to Clintonites.

https___bucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com_public_images_0b45b113-5a7c-4da1-bf91-e238963f7c1a_2048x1365.jpg

 

US media, at least those fed content from deep state sources like CIA and NSA, has collapsed in a smoldering heap. This is a great summation of how Russiagate never really had any verification…

More often, when explosive #Russiagate headlines go sideways, the original outlets simply ignore the new development, leaving the “retraction” process to conservative outlets that don’t reach the original audiences.

This is a major structural flaw of the new fully-divided media landscape in which Republican media covers Democratic corruption and Democratic media covers Republican corruption. If neither “side” feels the need to disclose its own errors and inconsistencies, mistakes accumulate quickly.

 

It’s official: Russiagate is this generation’s WMD

 

We’re at that next devolution: first and wrong. The Russiagate era has so degraded journalism that even once “reputable” outlets are now only about as right as politicians, which is to say barely ever, and then only by accident.

 

This section on DAVID CORN is kind of priceless:

In the program, however, the subject of getting facts right came up and Corn said this was not a time for reporters to be picking nits:

So Democrats getting overeager, overenthusiastic, stating things that may not be [unintelligible] true…? Well, tell me a political issue where that doesn’t happen. I think that’s looking at the wrong end of the telescope.

I wrote him later and suggested that since we’re in the press, and not really about anything except avoiding “things that may not be true,” maybe we had different responsibilities than “Democrats”? He wrote back:

Feel free to police the Trump opposition. But on the list of shit that needs to be covered these days, that’s just not high on my personal list.

 

#FireDavidCorn
#FireMaddow

 

ps

 

trump-russian-pee-tape-threat-level-raised-to-code-yellow

 

Remember the “Pee Dossier?”

Exactly what Clinton has been claiming Trump did–she did. Clinton and DNC funded the “dossier” to smear Trump and “colluded” with Russian government officials to get information.

This is the “Treason” accusation leveled at Trump for 2 years!

 

PS.

NSA’s William Binney: Russiagate a hoax; “Moderate confidence” means they have nothing.