Posts Tagged ‘research’

 

In a sane world, everyone involved would be dragged to a tribunal for endangering humanity.

From 2015:

Lab-Made Coronavirus Triggers Debate

 

So, this is common knowledge for half a decade (among virologists).

Professor Francis Boyle was 100% correct about “gain of function” with (mad) scientists actively trying to make coronaviruses MORE dangerous.

Explain why this isn’t illegal biological weapons experimentation? Someone? Is there no enforcement mechanism to stop this?

Nov. 2015:

Figure 1: SARS-like viruses replicate in human airway cells and produce in vivo pathogenesis.


“On the basis of these findings, we synthetically re-derived an infectious full-length SHC014 recombinant virus and demonstrate robust viral replication both in vitro and in vivo. “

They created a new infectious coronavirus in a laboratory. They bragged about it.

A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence
The “potential for human emergence” is THEM!

 

A familiar name:

Shi Zhengli

She is a researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), which is part of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). Shi and her colleague Cui Jie found that the SARS virus originated in bats.

gr1

download

Look carefully at the data.

 

This is from the world-famous British medical journal, The Lancet:

Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China

 

The first patient had no connection to the wild animal market that the media is selling as the source of the virus. This was 9 days before one patient showed up who did have a connection to the market. Curious?

Claims that Wuhan is host to China’s main Level-4 virus laboratory are true.

Kēxuéyuàn Wǔhàn Bìngdú Yánjiūsuǒ) is a research institute on virology administered by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). Located in Jiangxia DistrictWuhanHubei, it opened mainland China’s first biosafety level 4 (BSL–4) laboratory in 2015.”

Wuhan Institute of Virology

 

There is an information clampdown on this issue. Some have gone batshit crazy howling “Conspiracy Theory” at the tops of their lungs while disproving nothing.

Professor Francis Boyle is a genuine bio-warfare expert who wrote the 1989 law banning this research. He is now being actively censored and demonized for talking about these issues and suggesting the virus leaked from the laboratory after being enhanced to be a more effective biological weapon.

This is vital information. The world’s media should be investigating, not slandering experts.

Dr. Francis Boyle creator of US BioWeapons Act says Coronavirus is biological warfare weapon

 

Professor Boyle is referring to a study titled “Coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade,”
“Professor Boyle added: “Let me just conclude, the critical part here where it says: ‘And may provide a gain of function to the 2019 nCoV for efficient spreading in the human population compared to other beta coronaviruses.’”

Coronavirus shock claim: ‘Smoking gun of Chinese lab leak’ exposed by bioweapons expert

 

PS
The seafood/wild animal market is 277 meters from the virus laboratory.

The possible origins of 2019-nCoV coronavirus

Botao Xiao1,2* and Lei Xiao3
1 Joint International Research Laboratory of Synthetic Biology and Medicine, School
of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology,
Guangzhou 510006, China

China reported the virus to World Health Organization on December 31, but the first patient was known on December 1st, a 30-day delay! Why?

Report of a major cover-up and attempted destruction of all samples, which appears to have failed as it was beyond containment.

Chinese scientists destroyed proof of virus in December

 

CIA

 

 

FBI FILES

tumblr_inline_paa3jdBTOK1w07up9_500.jpg

 

One of our readers suggested this one.

Conspiracy Theory and the Failure of Certainty

ukraine-maidan-riots.si

 

CIA/Corporate Fronts Engineering the World

8266476742_4967a82707_z.jpg

Why doesn’t the federal government ensure reasonable prices for drugs developed with public funds?

 

The U.S. invests more than $32 billion each year in drug and biomedical research. This major public investment in drug research empowers the government to make drugs affordable under the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. But, even when drug companies price critical drugs at staggeringly high prices, the government has never used this authority. Why doesn’t the federal government ensure reasonable prices for drugs developed with public fundsan appropriate return on the public’s investment?

ISIS-2

This is huge (literally):
Unmasking ISIS

Where did ISIS come from? How was it able to gain land, arms and money so quickly?

1067613_Psilocybin-fig-2-3

New Study Is The First Ever To Map The Human Brain On LSD

sns120311a1vaccine_1053144a

Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry

“Administration of aluminium to neonatal mice in vaccine-relevant amounts is associated with adverse long term neurological outcomes”

Highlights

•Aluminium (Al) salts are the most widely used vaccine adjuvants today.

•Al adjuvants can persist in the body long-term and penetrate the blood-brain barrier.

•Al adjuvants can trigger adverse neurobehavioral outcomes in vaccine-relevant exposures.

•Efforts should be made to reduce Al exposure from vaccines.

medical-marijuana

Cannabis: A new frontier in therapeutics

Neuropsychiatrist and Director of the Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research (CMCR) at the University of California, San Diego Dr. Igor Grant is interested in the short and long-term neuropsychiatric effects of marijuana use. The CMCR has overseen some of the most extensive research on the therapeutic effects of medical marijuana in the U.S. “Despite a commonly held view that cannabis use results in brain damage, meta analyses of extensive neurocognitive studies fail to demonstrate meaningful cognitive declines among recreational users,” says Dr. Grant. “Bain imaging has produced variable results, with the best designed studies showing null findings.”

GMO-Ear-of-Corn

Download Report (pdf)

The whole paradigm of the genetic engineering technology is based on a misunderstanding. Every scientist now learns that any gene can give more than one protein and that inserting a gene anywhere in a plant eventually creates rogue proteins.

I am turning you towards a recent compilation (June 2012) of over 500 government reports and scientific articles published in peer reviewed Journals, some of them with the highest recognition in the world. Like The Lancet in the medical field, or Advances in Food and Nutrition Research, or Biotechnology, or Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, European Journal of Histochemistry, Journal of Proteome Research, etc. This compilation was made by a genetic engineer in London, and an investigative journalist who summarized the gist of the publications for the lay public.

Thierry Vrain

GMO whistleblower Dr. Thierry Vrain unveils insane insider information on engineered food

Former Pro-GMO Scientist Speaks Out On The Real Dangers of Genetically Engineered Food

9-11-attack

If you’re going to talk about the attacks of September 11th, two sources of information should be central to your understanding. The attacks have been studied meticulously for 13 years, but much of the accurate research is clouded by disinformation and misinformation.

  • HISTORY COMMONS / COMPLETE 9/11 TIMELINE is a library of news articles from around the world that bear on terrorism and the attacks. These are analyzed and cross referenced in numerous ways by Paul Thompson. This is completely searchable.
  • The 9/11 Consensus Points is a critical analysis of claims and counter-claims about the attacks. These are some of the numerous controversies, which remain.