Posts Tagged ‘sexism’

Trump Honors Women

Posted: March 9, 2017 in -
Tags: , , , , ,

170307-womens-day-march-crowd-wknd-938p_3cff7ff700cb11798dfa34ae34712919.nbcnews-ux-2880-1000.jpg

 

What an embarrassing, despicable, cretin this guy is. Any women who voted for him should be in therapy.

link

Advertisements

71b8b3360788ed0e265e058c812be4c6.jpg

Ashley, I reposted your Ted video. There it is. You’ve said your piece, and you have been heard. Such is the case when one’s name is well known, the luxury of being famous. Fame is a type of power.

My own piece regarding Hillary Clinton’s part in the killing of approximately two million human beings was ignored when I posted it to your Facebook page. You placed yourself into politics as an unquestioning supporter of Hillary. Politics is an ugly struggle for power, and in that realm the currency is propaganda, molded, blinkered views, edited, scripted talking points.

Not truth. God no. No politician alive cares a damn thing about the truth.

Granted, Hillary Clinton’s military actions were not targeted at white female Hollywood liberals, and so as far as “identity politics” goes, we can see how that demographic would have no reason to personally fear a Clinton presidency.

The Hillary Clinton supporters, like Barack Obama’s supporters, like Bill Clinton’s supporters all agree that when in power they can bomb at will the brown people in their home countries because those people simply cannot bomb them back.

So what has happened to real, living women in Libya, in Syria, in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Eastern Ukraine as well? That is the tip of the issue, and the issue is that invisible, yet brutal global military empire, which people like you cannot see or acknowledge exists.

article-2009451-0CC95AE200000578-525_634x390.jpg

You would think that Hillary Clinton’s direct dealings with the tyrants of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, Bahrain, etc. would be a tip-off, a sign that not all is as it seems on TV. These are the worst regimes on the planet in regard to women’s rights.

hillary-and-saudi-arabia-2.jpg

The Clintons, like the Bush clan, know where to shake their donation cups. They know what their oil sheikh patrons desire in the bargain, and that is mostly high-tech weaponry so as to expand their fiefdoms and to attack their neighbors, as Saudi Arabia today attacks Yemen directly and Syria through its proxy armies (ISIS/Al Nusrah/Al Sham).

CtIEFjuWgAAV1En.jpg

But what’s the point of continuing? Without the fame to act as a catalyst the truth has literally no value in this society. This post is worthless, despite the fact you cannot disprove a single phrase.

I find your own concerns warranted, but you are now on a slippery slope. Once censorship is the norm then the truth is the first casualty. Politicians don’t want to be held accountable, and wedge issues like yours act to open the door to outright banning of views and the silencing of dissenters. As you should be able to see, the truth is already unpopular and unwelcome.

#

hqdefault.jpg

A TOTALLY SEXIST GUIDE OF ‘HOW TO SUCCEED WITH BRUNETTES’ PRODUCED BY THE U.S. NAVY IN 1967

Just wow.

 

 

image

by Dr Samita Nandy

The lack of sexual diversity in Hollywood has been a critical issue that gained wide attention among movie lovers and researchers. But, as a recent University of Southern California report shows, a real change in the industry is still required. In particular, Dr Katherine Pieper points out “raised voices and calls for change are important, but so are practical and strategic solutions based on research.”

So how can we implement solutions based on research, such as the one that USC proposes?  Is the research showing solutions for all female species?

Research often offers observations and critical analysis of existing case studies. There are several feminist cases to study, such as Julia Roberts not wearing high heels and Alicia Keys not using makeup on the red carpet. Publicity of Angelina Jolie’s mastectomy – the fact that breasts are not essential for her sense of being a woman – generated contested views in feminism. While Jennifer Aniston received attention for her feminist perspectives on the impacts of paparazzi photography, Keira Knightley posed nude to protest against the use of Photoshop and questioned idealistic images of women in Hollywood. Furthermore, Mindy Kaling and Priyanka Chopra have successfully used media channels to represent themselves as coloured women in Hollywood, thus resisting ableism in a wider context of social justice. What else can researchers do apart from studying actions that these female actors have already taken and have also inspired others to do?

Well, being a living example of change and bearing witness of violence are essential for social justice. But most fans often shift responsibility to Hollywood actors as idols of our society. 

Here, we are not talking about blockbuster films in Hollywood only. One must note that Hollywood is an abstract cultural space where filmmakers and film studies scholars co-exist through material and symbolic modes of communication in shared environments. Furthermore, critical questions on the female are not limited to humans but also apply to animals in our overall environment of social practices. In this respect one of the issues that is rarely addressed is how atrocity in ongoing circumcision of male pigs and grinding of live male chicks is overlooked while exploitation of female reproductive organs e.g., chicken breasts, milk, and eggs is glamorized. These practices lead to normalizing, naturalizing, and legitimizing exploitation of female body parts. The exploitations are completely overlooked in Hollywood representations of a ‘bacon and egg’ breakfast after a steamy sex scene, where female actors are far more exposed and consumed than their male counterparts.

Now the USC report argues “women were over three times as likely as their male counterparts to be shown partly nude or in sexually revealing clothing”. Why?

In The Sexual Politics of Meat, feminist author Dr Carol Adams points out that sexism and speciesism have the same roots of patriarchal oppression in a class-based society. Unless we use verbal and non-verbal means to resist violence against all females, women will be not only underrepresented but also be animalized.

We cannot fight for the freedom of one while oppressing the ‘Other’ in discourses of the female body. The intersections in sexism show that there is no single issue cause in Hollywood and beyond.

So how can we bring much-needed changes in Hollywood representations of women and feminists that fight for diverse social issues?

We need to show intersections, and not categorizations.

We need to show how sexism, classism, speciesism, and ableism among many other ideological practices are interconnected in Hollywood. Using the intersectional approach, we must be a living example of change and resist images and products that support exploitation. As Gandhi says, “be the change you want to see.”

Centre for Media and Celebrity Studies is hosting a live Twitter chat that will resist sexism and speciesism among many issues from 8:30 pm to 9 pm (EST) on October 13, 2016. CMCS will continue the debates and actions to be in Hollywood filmmaking at its 4th international conference at University of Southern California in Marsh 2017. Visit http://cmc-centre.com/conferences/losangeles/ for information on how to join and make a difference together.

Dr Samita Nandy
Director, Centre for Media and Celebrity Studies (CMCS) & Co-Producer,Celebrity Chat
Author, Fame in Hollywood North. Toronto: WaterHill Publishing
PhD Curtin University, Australia (Media / Celebrity)
MA and BA York University, Canada (Communication)

make-germany-great-again-polfilmblogt-copy

 

 

dildo.jpg

 

Sexism in the Arts?

Posted: August 18, 2016 in -
Tags: , , , ,

1159084.jpg

 

Guerrilla Girls get ready for war on the European art world