Posts Tagged ‘spies’

this-week-in-russiagate-2

 

trump-epstein.jpg

People are jumping to conclusions all over the net. They assume it’s Mossad, but those same people always do, and their speculation is worthless.

Here’s what we have to assess.

The always-compromised “Daily Beast” says:

[Alex Acosta] cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. (The Labor Department had no comment when asked about this.)

This comes from a single source called Vicky Ward, and never appeared prior to two days ago. Who is Vicky Ward? How does she come to have this information? And why would she associate with war propaganda mill Daily Beast?

It Sure Looks Like Jeffrey Epstein Was a Spy—But Whose?

What’s not in doubt is that a sex trafficking ring centered on minors, which involved numerous global VIPs in compromising situations, would be of high interest to quite a few intelligence services.

WikiLeaks-Assange-Russia-NOT-Source - Copy

 

Assange is caught up in these games. The government claims “Guccifer 2” was:

  1. A Russian intelligence person
  2. The supplier of the Clinton emails

Both these claims look like nonsense. Guccifer 2 was a fraud created to frame Assange. It’s long and it’s tiresome.

Mueller’s Own Report Undercuts Its Core Russia-Meddling Claims

 

 

More important, as Raffi Khatchadourian has reported for The New Yorker, the documents Guccifer 2.0 released directly were nowhere near the quality of the material published by WikiLeaks. For example, on June 18, Guccifer 2.0 released documents that it claimed were from the DNC, “but which were almost surely not,” Khatchadourian notes. Neither was the material Guccifer 2.0 teased as a “dossier on Hillary Clinton from DNC.” The material Guccifer 2.0 initially promoted in June also contained easily discoverable Russian metadata. The computer that created it was configured for the Russian language, and the username was “Felix Dzerzhinsky,” the Bolshevik-era founder of the first Soviet secret police.

WikiLeaks only made contact with Guccifer 2.0 after the latter publicly invited journalists “to send me their questions via Twitter Direct Messages.” And, more problematic given the central role the report assigned to Guccifer 2.0, there is no direct evidence that WikiLeaks actually released anything that Guccifer 2.0 provided. In a 2017 interview, Assange said he “didn’t publish” any material from that source because much of it had been published elsewhere and because “we didn’t have the resources to independently verify.”

..

Assange also made public offers to testify before Congress. The Mueller report makes no mention of these overtures, though it does cite and dismiss “media reports” that “Assange told a U.S. congressman that the DNC hack was an ‘inside job,’ and purported to have ‘physical proof’ that Russians did not give materials to Assange.”

Mueller does not explain why he included Assange’s comments as reported by media outlets in his report but decided not to speak with Assange directly, or ask to see his “physical proof,” during a two-year investigation.

IDFComputerSchool

 

How Israeli spies are flooding Facebook and Twitter

”One of the principles for success is keeping our methods of action secret…Since most of the ministry’s actions are not of the ministry, but through bodies around the world who do not want to expose their connection with the state, we must protect the information whose exposure could harm the battle.”

Bill calling to keep Strategic Affairs Ministry`s efforts to combat delegitimization secret passes first reading

 

 

trump-russian-pee-tape-threat-level-raised-to-code-yellow

 

In the wake of Trump saying he’d like foreign dirt on opponents (again), the Democratic brainwashed Tweeter Brigade is out vomiting all over the net.

But they never had a problem with a UK SPY working for their candidate. A spy. From the UK, and most certainly not an American. This was a foreigner meddling in the election. They spin it away with the “special” status of Britain, them being friends and such, what hypocritical nonsense.

But even when that UK spy was exposed for using RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT SOURCES, they still have a remarkable capacity for not seeing a problem there. The hypocrisy meter is broken beyond repair.

Clinton & DNC lied and covered this up for about a year during election season:

Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier

How good were these sources? Consider what Steele would write in the memos he filed with Simpson: Source A—to use the careful nomenclature of his dossier—was “a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure.” Source B was “a former top level intelligence officer still active in the Kremlin.”

HOW EX-SPY CHRISTOPHER STEELE COMPILED HIS EXPLOSIVE TRUMP-RUSSIA DOSSIER

 

So, good luck talking facts and logic to Clintonites.

aaaaa1984-movie-big-brother1

 

These Ex-Spies Are Harvesting Facebook Photos For A Massive Facial Recognition Database

over the last five years a secretive surveillance company founded by a former Israeli intelligence officer has been quietly building a massive facial recognition database consisting of faces acquired from the giant social network, YouTube and countless other websites. Privacy activists are suitably alarmed.

cia-logo

 

The CIA Democrats

 

HALF of the Democraps running for Congress in 2018 are apparently CIA.