Posts Tagged ‘support to terrorists’

response-to-partisan propaganda copy.png

 

Let’s start with half a million dead children, as that should get attention, but seldom does among liberals who think only Republicans are capable of evil.

 

Yes. They admitted it on national television. Something is rotten in Demland.

As for Obama:

Here’s Kucinich, one of their own, whom they turned on and prmaried out of the congress for being too honest:

 

Obama agrees with Turkey’s Erdogan to support “foreign extremists” inside Syria, which means Al Qaeda/ISIS. These are the “extremists.”

Hillary Clinton informed “AQ (Al Qaeda) is on our side” in 2012. “Our” meaning the US State Department, not the rest of us.

Seymour Hersh exposes “deal” for CIA and MI6 to smuggle weapons to Syrian terrorists (paywall).

 “A highly classified annex to the report, not made public, described a secret agreement reached in early 2012 between the Obama and Erdogan administrations. It pertained to the rat line. By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria.”

“The [Benghazi] consulate’s only mission was to provide cover for the moving of arms,’ the former intelligence official, who has read the annex, said. ‘It had no real political role.’”

Timber Sycamore – CIA arms and training of Syrian terrorists.

EU Report “Shocked” Their Weapons Diverted to ISIS, halt arms transfers to US.

To Be Continued

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

olbaidi.jpg

Olkaidi admits to working with ISIL daily!

That Syrian Colonel admitting to working with Al Qaeda and ISIS, I found a mirrored copy after the first one disappeared. I also told The Intercept about it, since they’re trying to pretend Youtube is censoring war crimes mostly about the Syrian government and Russia–more anti-Russia demonization. But they never investigated the terrorists’ links to the US and its allies…

olkaidi-2.jpg

Okaidi with (Obama’s) US Ambassador!

Why ISIS Exists

Screen-Shot-2017-06-28-at-10.40.43-PM-768x480.png

 

Trump’s ‘No Fly Zone’ Escalates U.S. War Against Syria

unnamed-6-e1487739073427.jpg

 

The “White Helmets” Go to Hollywood

 

url.jpg

 

* ** NOTE: This story by Max Blumenthal appears on propaganda front “AlterNet,” which is an untrustworthy organization in need of investigation itself. Blumenthal has proven to be a decent journalist. Looks like a conflict.

Inside the Shadowy PR Firm That’s Lobbying for Regime Change in Syria

USAID is the White Helmets’ principal funder, committing at least $23 million to the group since 2013. This money was part of $339.6 million budgeted by USAIDfor “supporting activities that pursue a peaceful transition to a democratic and stable Syria” — or establishing a parallel governing structure that could fill the power vacuum once Bashar Al-Assad was removed.

…Looming over this opaque operation are questions about its connections to Avaaz, a global public relations outfit that played an instrumental role in generating support for a no-fly zone in Libya, and The Syria Campaign’s founding by Purpose, another PR firm spun out of Avaaz. James Sadri bristled when I asked about the issue, dismissing it as a “crank conspiracy” ginned up by Russian state media and hardcore Assadist elements.

USAID-JIHAD-XPRESS PROGRAM-halfsize

 

isis-syria-army-behead
Deadly Blowback from Neo-Imperial Wars

syria-fields-720

Have I just personally changed the course of the Syrian war???

On Nov. 3 I wrote:

Mr. Obama,

Oil wells have addresses.

Are you still pretending to fight ISIS, when you could, on any day, and at any time, have simply bombed the Islamic State oil wells and put them out of commission?

Today the NY Times says that Obama’s planes are bombing oil fields now, and this time they really mean it. (So they claim. I remain skeptical.)

U.S. Steps Up Its Attacks on ISIS-Controlled Oil Fields in Syria

Coincidence?

Really?

Or are some glaring frauds too smelly to continue once the public gets a whiff of how ridiculous they are?

NYT:

The goal of the operation over the next several weeks is to cripple eight major oil fields, about two-thirds of the refineries and other oil-production sites controlled by the Islamic State, also called ISIS or ISIL.

“We intend to shut it all down,” Col. Steven H. Warren, a military spokesman in Baghdad, said in an email on Thursday [yesterday].

So it’s taken over a year to get around to allowing the Air Force to degrade the ISIS money supply. Nothing fishy there, right?

PS

Two more glaring issues:

  1. The “next several weeks” tells you how long it would have taken in the first place. What have they been doing all this time?
  2. They are stopping at “two-thirds of the refineries and other oil-production sites controlled by the Islamic State.” Why 2/3? They want to retain an engine to keep it going indefinitely.
PPS.

Stephen Lendman speculates:

Attacking ISIS held Syrian oil fields now appears part of a plan to prevent their use by Damascus if its army regains control. They’ve been protected to provide income for America’s proxy terrorist foot soldiers.

 Washington wants Assad deprived of an important revenue source. If his forces recapture ISIS held oil fields and facilities, they’ll likely find them turned to rubble.