KRISTEN BREITWEISER goes for the throat.
We have met the enemy.
Can you say “Fake Terror War?”
So how to describe this?
Terror Lite (TM)?
Fraud On Terrorism
Material Support for Terrorism
Sham (! Ahrar al-Sham is one of the groups!)
Crimes Against Humanity
Which one suits this best?
Add your own outrage for what our government is doing right now with our tax dollars, supporting terrorists around the Middle East for fun and profit…
Virtually every suspect involved in recent Brussels bombing had been tracked, arrested, in custody – either by European security agencies or the agencies of their allies – but inexplicably released and allowed to carry out both the Brussels attack as well as the Paris attack that preceded it.
Sadly, very few have any sense of civic responsibility. Vanity Fair covered what’s in those 28 pages five years before 60 Minutes decided to get around to it.
This is also not nearly the full story, which would take a year to go through.
The article is what Americans should at a minimum be familiar with and COMPLETELY OUTRAGED ABOUT.
Documentary may only be viewable in the UK.
It reiterated that there was evidence of Saudi involvement in the terrorist attacks on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon in 2001, noting that 15 of the 19 suspects were Saudi citizens, while Al Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden was a member of a prominent Saudi family.
It then referred to the Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia and Herzegovina (SHC), ostensibly a charity for the relief of Bosnian Muslims during the Balkan wars in the 1990s, which had collected £375 ($600) million by 2001. The largest fundraising effort undertaken in Muslim and Arab countries, it was a front organisation for Al Qaeda in the Balkans and was used to facilitate arms shipments to break a United Nations embargo on the former Yugoslav states from 1991 to 1996. Jihadists attached to the SHC carried out a car bomb attack in 2001 after the war had ended, in an effort to reignite the war.
Middle East nations are zero threat to the United States and have no desire to attack it in any way. Rogue, religion-obsessed groups such as Al Qaeda, Al Nusrah Front and Daesh/ISIS/ISIL however, have larger ambitions.
What does the US do?
In 2003 it completely destroys the secular regime in Iraq, a nation where no Al Qaeda terrorists had ever survived previously. Today it is a terrorist Disneyland.
In 2011 the US and NATO target Qadaffi, who had fought against the terrorist groups for decades and was their number one enemy in the region. America bombs Libya’s government forces and empowers the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, now known as ISIS in Libya.
In 2011-2012, the CIA and other covert intelligence services move the weapons captured in Libya over through Turkey and to Syrian extremists. These people are fighting the government, which like the others, was the main opposition to terrorists in the country. These rebels then spring dozens of religion-obsessed, rogue terrorist groups with a multitude of names. Arms and money continue to pour in through Turkey and the neighboring regimes, such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
Everyone who matters knows all this. The grossly ignorant American public still believes that the US government opposes terrorism when its actions–not words–betray its true agenda.
Ask your so-called “leaders” why all those nations that give arms and money to ISIS and its partners have no sanctions placed against them? Not one. No sanctions have even been proposed. No one in our government lifts a finger against the people we are told are our “allies.”
Do you believe your “allies” fund, give weapons to, and train Al Qaeda?
Do you have a problem with that idea?