Posts Tagged ‘“War On Terrorism”’

1066663381.jpg

 

Some of us reality-based intelligentsia have been warning about this for–I don’t know–seven or eight years now. This is what happens when you cozy up with terrorists. Blame MI6, MI5, and their political bosses when SHIT STARTS BLOWING UP AGAIN.

UK rehomes some 100 Syria White Helmets and family members

 

151202200423-29-san-bernardino-shooting-1202-restricted-super-169

 

Machiavellian strategy: half the job is creating the problem, the other half is solving it.

The modern version is known as the “Strategy of Tension.”

CNN:

Investigators think that as the San Bernardino, California, massacre was happening, female shooter Tashfeen Malik posted a pledge of allegiance to ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi on Facebook, three U.S. officials familiar with the investigation told CNN.

Malik’s post was made on an account with a different name, one U.S. official said. The officials did not explain how they knew Malik made the post.

Investigative reporter Seymour Hersh gestures during a panel discussion on "The Challenges of Reporting About Iraq" at the Associated Press Managing Editors annual conference in San Jose, Calif., Friday, Oct. 28, 2005. Deteriorating security in Iraq has made covering the war and reconstruction efforts exceedingly difficult, and this isn't helping efforts to give readers the coverage they need to understand what's really going on, a panel of journalists said Friday. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)

Investigative reporter Seymour Hersh gestures during a panel discussion on “The Challenges of Reporting About Iraq” at the Associated Press Managing Editors annual conference in San Jose, Calif., Friday, Oct. 28, 2005. Deteriorating security in Iraq has made covering the war and reconstruction efforts exceedingly difficult, and this isn’t helping efforts to give readers the coverage they need to understand what’s really going on, a panel of journalists said Friday. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)

“Allies” were guarding and funding America’s worst enemy

syrian2

Nafeez Ahmed:

The circus: How British intelligence primed both sides of the ‘terror war’

Over the last decade or so – the very same period that the British state was grooming the “former jihadists who weren’t” so they could be paraded around the media-security-industrial complex bigging up the non-threat of “non-violent extremism” – the CIA and MI6 were coordinatingSaudi-led funding to al-Qaeda affiliated extremists across the Middle East and Central Asia to counter Iranian Shiite influence.

…Nevertheless in 2013, it was David Cameron who lifted the arms embargo to support Syria’s rebels [and Barack Obama in the USA]. We now know that most of our military aid went to al-Qaeda affiliated Islamists, many with links to extremists at home. The British government itselfacknowledged that a “substantial number” of Britons were fighting in Syria, who “will seek to carry out attacks against Western interests… or in Western states”.

…Yet according to former British counterterrorism intelligence officer Charles Shoebridge, despite this risk, authorities “turned a blind eye to the travelling of its own jihadists to Syria, notwithstanding ample video etc. evidence of their crimes there,” because it “suited the US and UK’s anti-Assad foreign policy”.

…This terror-funnel is what enabled people like Emwazi to travel to Syria and join up with IS – despite being on an MI5 terror watch-list. He had been blocked by the security services from traveling to Kuwait in 2010: why not Syria?

Also See:

Nafeez Ahmed: Why the war on ISIS will fail

There are only a handful of guys in the world who both know what’s going on and choose to tell the truth about it. Nafeez is one of them.

uk-alqaeda-member-deport.si

UK fails to deport Al-Qaeda member linked to Paris attackers – report
Ummmmmmmmm…
Here’s a naive question for the peanut gallery…

Why isn’t he in, oh, I don’t know? Jail?

Terrorist fundraiser, recruiter — CONVICTED, NO LESS — and he’s running around Britain. Shouldn’t half the governments of the world be looking to lock his ass up?

There have been many terrorists living openly in the UK. Many.

Yes, Virginia, the “war on terror” is a fraud. Having enemies running around is the most profitable business in the world. Here’s the guy you were looking for; go arrest him. The UK released him from prison in 2009, an Al Qaeda leader. You can’t make this shit up.

They lock up people for marijuana!

This guy is an Al Qaeda recruiter!

Your fraud on terror strains credulity.

middle_east_graphic_2003

US Surveillance Flights A Step Toward Expanding War Into Syria

I remember discussing this absurdity with my wife a couple of years ago. They were helping the Syrian Jihadis, who had massacred thousands already. They are the US, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey and the rest of the NATO clowns. Probably Israel as well, but that might be trickier.

So they helped radical Jihadi terrorists inside Syria for three years.

The obvious endgame would be–to get what they really want–use the Jihadis they had helped as the cassus belli. Now they had to go fight the terrorism they created!

syrian2I doubted that could fly. It doesn’t pass the laugh test. It doesn’t align with the paradigms and myths even. It’s so flagrantly obvious, so ridiculous on its face, but here we are today. ISIS terrorists are sweeping across Asia, and now “we” can go bomb them, and ANYONE ELSE NEARBY “WE” DON’T LIKE.

As in the 1980 Afghan/Soviet Jihad, the US creates the monster, with a lot of money and a lot of help from its “friends.” Then it turns around, and screams: there are terrorists in the world!

Oh really? You mean the ones you were arming, training, funding and transporting around the region?  Oh yeah, them.

This sad formula assumes our population are drooling imbeciles.

Are they wrong?

ISIS was helped by US “partners,” and the US has aided their cause in Syria for years in the UN and with covert supplies, including weapons, and a training program in Jordan. The treasonous US puppet masters assume their Jihadi lieges are easily vanquished should the US decide to wage war on them. The Jihadis assume the US is so corrupt and stupid that it is helping the people who want to kill them.

 

USAID-JIHAD-XPRESS PROGRAM-halfsize

 

This goes beyond “policy” a banal word that masks reality. It is material support for terrorism. It is potentially treason. It is official US policy to help radical Jihadist “terrorists” in a bunch of nations today. Isn’t that supposed to be a problem?

 

OBAMA-LIAR
Obama waives ban on arming terrorists to allow aid to Syrian opposition

The president, citing his authority under the Arms Export Control Act, announced today that he would “waive the prohibitions in sections 40 and 40A of the AECA related to such a transaction.”

Those two sections prohibit sending weaponry to countries described in section 40(d): “The prohibitions contained in this section apply with respect to a country if the Secretary of State determines that the government of that country has repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism,” Congress stated in the Arms Control Export Act.

Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., and Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., endorsed providing military assistance to the Syrian opposition during an appearance on CBS’ “Face the Nation” Sunday.

“Our intelligence agencies, I think, have a very good handle on who to support and who not to support,” Corker said. “And there’s going to be mistakes. We understand some people are going to get arms that should not be getting arms.

“Mistakes” is what they call it when they intentionally arm Al Qaeda.

The fraud on terror ended today with this admission that they can and will (and of course already have) give “material support” to terrorist psychopaths.  Welcome to the New World Order.   You ignorant fucktards owe the diligent citizens quite a bit of apology.

The Smoking Gun

Presidential Determination — Syria

Exhibit A for the Treason Trial.

PS.

Are we in Triple Speak yet?  Arming Al Qaeda is good for the national security of the US?   Even the Mad Hatter is politely bowing out of this one.